Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction and Epidemiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Contact Dermatitis

  • 462 Accesses

Abstract

Contact dermatitis is the most frequent form (60%) of all the eczematous dermatoses and is among the most common diseases observed in dermatology and in occupational medicine. It is widespread in both occupational and non occupational settings: in the former case the incidence ranges from 85 to 98% of all job-related skin diseases; the peak prevalences are recorded in the building, leather, rubber, metallurgy, food, and chemical industries; health staff and apprentice hairdressers are also at high risk. From the aetiopathogenic and clinical standpoints, contact dermatitis can be subdivided into various types of reactions (irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, photocontact dermatitis, noneczematous contact dermatitis, systemic contact dermatitis, and contact urticaria). Among these reactions, irritant contact dermatitis shows a more prevalent incidence today than contact allergy, for various reasons. The clinical differences among the various forms of contact dermatitis are due to a number of factors, especially the type of contact (exogenous, direct or airborne, and endogenous; the latter comes into action in subjects who have been prior sensitized by exogenous route, as occurs in case of systemic contact dermatitis), the chemical characteristics of particular causal agents, and the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in each case. A recent meta-analysis shows that one in five subjects from the general population suffers from contact allergy. The most common allergen is nickel, followed by fragrance mix, cobalt, balsam of Peru, chromium, paraphenylenediamine, isothiazolinones, and colophony. Various data demonstrate that seasonal factors can also affect the incidence of contact dermatitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Le dermatiti da contatto. Roma: Lombardo Ed; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woods B, Calnan CD. Toxic woods. Br J Dermatol. 1976;94(suppl. 12):47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cadwick J, Mann WN. The medical works of Hippocrates. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castagne D. Dermatoses professionnelles provoquées par les bois tropicaux. Bordeaux, Bergeret: Thèse U.E.R; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell J, Rook A. Botanical dermatology. Vancouver: Greengrass; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lachapelle JM. Historical aspects. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramazzini B. De morbis artificium diatriba. Typis Antonii Capponi, Impressoris Episcopalis, Modena; 1700.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foussereau J. History of epicutaneous testing: the blotting-paper and other methods. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11:219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright RC, Goldman L. Contact dermatitis: a historical perspective. Int J Dermatol. 1979;18:665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Avenberg KM. Footnotes on allergy. Uppsala: Pharmacia; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rostenberg A. An anedotal biographical history of poison ivy. Arch Dermatol. 1955;72:438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lachapelle JM. Le test épicutané: aperçu historique. Gist-Brocades, Brussels: Seninfo; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lachapelle JM. Giant steps in patch testing. A historical memoir. Phoenix, AZ (USA): SmartPractice; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Städeler J. Űber die eigenhümlichen Bestandtheile der Anacardium Früchte. Ann Chemie Fharmacie. 1847;63:117.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fabre J-H. Souvenirs entomologiques, vol. 6. Paris: Delagrave; 1897. p. 378.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rostenberg A, Solomon LM. Jean Henri Fabre and the patch test. Arch Dermatol. 1968;98:188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lachapelle JM. The experiments of an entomologist, Jean-Henri Fabre, and their repercussions in dermatology. In: Lachapelle JM, editor. Giant steps in patch testing. A historical memoir. Phoenix, AZ (USA): SmartPractice; 2010. p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sulzberger MD. Josef Jadassohn (1863–1936). Arch Dermatol. 1936;33:1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sulzberger MD. From there to here. My many lives. An autobiography of a dermatologist. Institute for Dermatologic Communications and Education. Skin Allergy News; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jadassohn J. Zur Kenntnis der Arzneiexantheme. Arch Dermatol Forsch. 1896;34:103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jadassohn J. Zur Kenntnis der medicamentösen Dermatosen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, V Congress, Vienna (1895), Braunmüller: 1896. p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lachapelle JM. Josef Jadassohn (1863–1936): the father of patch testing. In: Lachapelle JM, editor. Giant steps in patch testing. A historical memoir. Phoenix, Az (USA): SmartPractice; 2010. p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neisser A. Űber Jodoform-Exantheme. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1884;10:467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. LMR. National medical registration. SIG, Utrecht: LRM yearbook; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Emmet EA. The skin and occupational disease. Arch Environ Health. 1984;39:144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathias CGT. The cost of occupational skin disease. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson MLT, Burdick AE, Johnson KG, et al. Prevalence, morbidity and cost of dermatological disease. J Invest Dermatol. 1979;73:395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keil JE, Shumes E. The epidemiology of work-related skin disease in South Carolina. Arch Dermatol. 1983;119:650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Menné T, Backman E. Permanent disability from skin diseases. A study of 564 patients over 6-yr period. Dermatosen Beruf Umwelt 27:32 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rystedt I. Factors influencing the occurence of hand eczema in adult with a history of atopic dermatitis in childhood. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rystedt I. Atopic background in patients with occupational hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Menné T, Christoffersen J. Epidemiology of allergic contact sensitization. Curr Prob Dermatol. 1985;14:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Swietlik J, Reeder M. Current quality-of-life tools available for use in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2016;27:176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saetterstrom B, Olsen J, Johansen JD. Cost-of-illness of patients with contact dermatitis in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71:154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, et al. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alinaghi F, Bennike NH, Egeberg A, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2019; 80: 77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Peiser M, Tralau T, Heidler J, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechenisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations: the Odense adolescence cohort study on atopic diseases and dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82:352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson MT, Roberts J. Skin conditions and related need for medical care among persons 1–74 years. Vital Health Stat. 1978;11:1971–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Coenraads PJ, Nater JP, van der Lenbe R. Prevalence of eczema and other dermatoses of the hands and arms in Netherlands. Association with age and occupation. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1983;8:495.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Meding BE, Swanbeck G. Prevalence of hand eczema in an industrial city. Br J Dermatol. 1987;116:627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kavli G, Forde OH. Hand dermatoses in Tromso. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10:174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cashman MW, Rendemann PA, Ehrlich A. Contact dermatitis in the United States: epidemiology, economic impact, and workplace prevention. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Clark SC, Zirwass MJ. Management of occupational dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27:365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lushniak BD. Occupational contact dermatitis. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Blanciforti LA. Economic burden of dermatitis in US workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:1045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McCall BP, Horwitz IB, Feldman SR, et al (2005) Incidence, rates, costs, severity, and work-related factors of occupational dermatitis. A workers’ compensation analysis of Oregon, 1990–1997. Arch Dermatol 141:713.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mathias CGT. Occupational dematoses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19:1107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Belsito DV. Occupational contact dermatitis: etiology, prevalence, and resultant impairment/disability. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Koch P. Occupational contact dermatitis. Recognition and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2:353.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, et al. Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: I-IV. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 1991;2:122, 198, 247.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Curr N, Dharmage S, Keegel T, et al. The validity and reliability of the occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:157.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kucenic MJ, Belsito DV. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis is more prevalent than irritant contact dermatits: a 5-year study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Breuer K, Uter W, Geier J. Epidemiological data on airborne contact dermatitis—results of IVDK. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schuttelaar MLA, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercing: the EDEN Fragrance Study. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79:1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Menné T, et al. Prevalence of nickel allergy in Europe following the EU Nickel Directive—a review. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Warshaw EM, Zhang AJ, DeKoven JG, et al. Epidemiology of nickel sensitivity: retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data 1994–2014. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lowney ED. Dermatologic implications of immunologic unresponsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;54:355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Njorth N. Seasonal variations in contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1967;47:409.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kanan MW. Cement dermatitis and atmospheric parameters in Kwait. Br J Dermatol. 1972;86:155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Morison WL. Photoimmunology. J Invest Dermatol. 1981;77:71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. O’Dell BL, Jessen T, Bocker LE, et al. Diminished immune response in sun damaged skin. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Thorvaldesen J, Volden G. PUVA-induced diminution of contact allergic and irritant skin. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1980;5:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Smit HA, Van Rijssen A, Vandenbroucke J, et al. Individual susceptibility and the incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of apprentice hairdressers and nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20:113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Caterina Foti, Domenico Bonamonte & Anna Bosco

  2. Professor of Dermatology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Gianni Angelini

Authors
  1. Caterina Foti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Domenico Bonamonte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Bosco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gianni Angelini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caterina Foti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Dermatology, Bari, Italy

    Gianni Angelini

  2. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Domenico Bonamonte

  3. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Caterina Foti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foti, C., Bonamonte, D., Bosco, A., Angelini, G. (2021). Introduction and Epidemiology. In: Angelini, G., Bonamonte, D., Foti, C. (eds) Clinical Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49331-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49332-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation