Skip to main content

An Economic Model for Selecting Urban-Scale Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Abstract

The evaluation of alternative scenarios of urban and territorial transformation is complex decision problem, the resolution of which requires the simultaneous consideration of issues not only technical, but also social, cultural and environmental, based on a pluralistic and systemic vision of the problem. The Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) techniques offer an effective help in this direction, which provide a rational methodology of choice capable of taking into account multiple objectives to be pursued. The aim of the paper is to define a multi-criteria evaluation model useful for selecting the best compromise combination of projects that must make up an integrated urban regeneration program. The novelty of the research consists in combining the Analytical Network Process (ANP) with the Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP), where the ANP allows to express the interdependence relations between the criteria, as well as between criteria and projects, while the ZOGP allows to consider requirements and constraints of the reference system. The actual application of the model may have repercussions on the processes of allocating public resources, thus constituting an economic policy tool.

The contribution to this paper is the result of the joint work of both authors, to which the paper has to be attributed in equal parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dipace, R.: La rigenerazione urbana tra programmazione e pianificazione. In: Rivista giuridica dell’edilizia, vol. 5, pp. 237–260. Giuffrè Editore, Milano (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts, P., Sykes, H., Granger, R.: Urban Regeneration. SAGE Publications, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Mare, G., Nesticò, A., Tajani, F.: The rational quantification of social housing. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 27–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Della Spina, L.: A multi-level integrated approach to designing complex urban scenarios in support of strategic planning and urban regeneration. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds.) ISHT 2018. SIST, vol. 100, pp. 226–237. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Ruocco, G., Nesticò, A.: Archaeological site conservation and enhancement: an economic evaluation model for the selection of investment projects. Sustainability 10(11), 3907 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tramontana, C., Calabrò, F., Cassalia, G., Rizzuto, M.C.: Economic sustainability in the management of archaeological sites: the case of Bova Marina (Reggio Calabria, Italy). In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds.) ISHT 2018. SIST, vol. 101, pp. 288–297. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ribera, F., Nesticò, A., Cucco, P., Maselli, G.: A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings. J. Cult. Heritage. 41, 166–177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Declining discount rate estimate in the long-term economic evaluation of environmental projects. J. Environ. Account. Manage. 8(1), 93–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Troisi, R., Alfano, G.: Towns as safety organizational fields: an institutional framework in times of emergency. Sustainability 11(24), 7025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bottero, M., Mondini, G., Oppio, A.: Decision Support systems for evaluating urban regeneration. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 923–928 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van den Hove, S.: Between consensus and compromise. Acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy 23, 10–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, W., Shen, G.Q., Wang, H., Hong, J., Li, Z.: Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: a multi-scale model. Land Use Policy 69, 361–371 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Maio, A., Rostirolla, P.: Tecniche e supporti per la selezione dei progetti di investimento. Progetto Nuval. Formez, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze - Dipartimento per le Politiche di Sviluppo e di Coesione, Roma (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Esposito, E., Rostirolla, P.: Un approccio multicriterio alla valutazione di un piano con piĂą decisori. Metodi di valutazione nella pianificazione urbana e territoriale. Teoria e casi studio. IRIS-CNR, Bari (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nesticò, A., Sica, F.: The sustainability of urban renewal projects: a model for economic multi-criteria analysis. J. Property Investment Finan. 35(4), 397–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/jpif-01-2017-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nesticò, A., Morano, P., Sica, F.: A model to support the public administration decisions for the investments selection on historic buildings. J. Cult. Heritage. 33, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.008

  17. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Estimative analysis of a segment of the bare ownership market of residential property. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7974, pp. 433–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Battisti, F., Campo, O: A methodology for determining the profitability index of real estate initiatives involving public-private partnerships. A case study: the integrated intervention programs in Rome. Sustainability 11(5), 1371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051371

  19. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Torrieri, F., Nijkamp, P.J., Shapira, A.: Real estate investment choices and decision support systems. Sustainability 11(11), 3110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Sustainability indicators for the economic evaluation of tourism investments on islands. J. Cleaner Prod. 248, 119217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wey, W.M., Wu, K.Y.: Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Math. Comput. Modell. 46, 985–1000 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wey, W.M., Huang, Y.C.: A study of priority evaluation and resource allocation for revitalization of cultural heritages in the urban development. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 7, 2708–2714 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gür, S., Hamurcu, M., Eren, T.: Using analytic network process and goal programming methods for project selection in the public institution. In: Les Cahiers MECAS, pp. 36–46 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, J.W., Kim, S.H.: Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 27, 367–382 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Nesticò, A., Moffa, R.: Economic analysis and operational research tools for estimating productivity levels in off-site construction [Analisi economiche e strumenti di Ricerca Operativa per la stima dei livelli di produttività nell’edilizia off-site]. Valori e Valutazioni, no. 20, pp. 107–126. DEI Tipografia del Genio Civile, Roma (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jadidi, O., Cavalieri, S., Zolfaghari, S.: An improved multi-choice goal programming approach for supplier selection problems. Appl. Math. Modell. 39(14), 4213–4222 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Romero, C.: Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Rehman, H.U.: Goal programming. https://www.slideshare.net/hakeemrehman/goal-programming-68158871. Accessed 2019

  31. Tiwari, S., Kumar, A.: Comparison between goal programming and other linear programming methods. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. (IJRASET) 6, 926–929 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Nesticò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nesticò, A., Elia, C. (2021). An Economic Model for Selecting Urban-Scale Projects. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics