Skip to main content

The Common Legal Platform Revolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Liquid Legal

Part of the book series: Law for Professionals ((LP))

Abstract

The common legal platform revolution will accelerate the already ongoing digital transformation and disruption of the legal industry. This chapter of “Liquid Legal - Towards a Common Legal Platform” will provide a comprehensive and practical approach to the design and architecture of the common legal platform. The common legal platform is intended for legal professionals that are interested in advancing the legal industry as a whole through collaboration. It is meant to be open and neutral, trustworthy and secure, globally scalable and user-centric. The chapter will propose designs for the functionality and core interaction of the common legal platform, defining its participants, value unit and filters. The significance of network effects, especially positive same-side and cross-side network effects, will be explored, as well as how frictionless entry and side switching may maximize the value-building impact of network effects. The concepts of pull mechanisms and positive feedback loops, and of mechanisms for facilitating platform interactions and for effective user matching will be discussed. These concepts collectively attract and keep users on the common legal platform by facilitating the creation of mutually rewarding interactions and exchanges. The degree of openness of the common legal platform with respect to manager and sponsor participation, developer participation and user participation will be calibrated, involving the use of APIs and curation. The technology of the common legal platform will be examined, recommending the adherence to the end-to-end principle, as well as to extremely high standards for IT, network and data security as well as data protection and especially GDPR compliance to ensure users may trust in securely participating on the common legal platform. The path of evolution of the common legal platform will be implied, considering how over time more types of interactions may be added to the platform in order to generate further value for its users and to attract new types of participants. Finally, this chapter invites all stakeholders of the legal industry to participate in shaping the common legal platform revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jacob (2017), Schindler (2017), Liquid Legal Institute e.V. (2018) and Jacob et al. (2019).

  2. 2.

    Jacob (2017) and Kuhlmann (2017).

  3. 3.

    Jacob (2017), Schindler (2017), Jacob et al. (2019).

  4. 4.

    Jacob et al. (2017b), p. xx.

  5. 5.

    Jacob (2017), Schindler (2017) and Jacob et al. (2019).

  6. 6.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 38.

  7. 7.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  8. 8.

    Parker et al. (2016), pp. 38–39.

  9. 9.

    Parker et al. (2016), pp. 39–40.

  10. 10.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 17.

  11. 11.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 34.

  12. 12.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  13. 13.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  14. 14.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  15. 15.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 44.

  16. 16.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 45.

  17. 17.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  18. 18.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  19. 19.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 45.

  20. 20.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  21. 21.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  22. 22.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 48.

  23. 23.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  24. 24.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  25. 25.

    Eisenmann et al. (2009).

  26. 26.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  27. 27.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 135.

  28. 28.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 135.

  29. 29.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  30. 30.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 138.

  31. 31.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  32. 32.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 141.

  33. 33.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 142.

  34. 34.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 143.

  35. 35.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 145.

  36. 36.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 145.

  37. 37.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  38. 38.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.

  39. 39.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  40. 40.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.

  41. 41.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.

  42. 42.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 52.

  43. 43.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 54.

  44. 44.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 55.

  45. 45.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  46. 46.

    Parker et al. (2016).

  47. 47.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 78.

  48. 48.

    Parker et al. (2016), p. 289.

  49. 49.

    Susskind (2014a, b) and Andreae (2016).

  50. 50.

    Andreae (2016).

  51. 51.

    Andreae (2016) and Parker et al. (2016).

  52. 52.

    Andreae (2016).

References

  • Andreae Z (2016) The role of legal tech startups in the digital transformation of the German legal industry. ESADE Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann TR, Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2009) Opening platforms: how, when and why? In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K (2017) Jetzt ist der Zeitpunkt zum Handeln. Warum wir eine Kollaborationsplattform für den gesamten Rechtsmarkt brauchen. Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, (Ausgabe 14):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K, Schindler D, Strathausen R (2017a) Liquid legal. Springer International Publishing (Management for Professionals), Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K, Schindler D, & Strathausen R (2017b) Preface. In: Liquid legal. Springer International Publishing (Management for Professionals), Cham, p. xx

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K, Schindler D, Waltl B (2019) We are open and creating tomorrow’s legal. A close-up look at the Liquid Legal Institute e.V. Bus Law Mag 2:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann N (2017) Die digitale Rechtsabteilung – Interview mit Kai Jacob (SAP). Legal Tech Blog

    Google Scholar 

  • Liquid Legal Institute e.V. (2018) Let’s design the Future! Liquid Legal Institute: die neue Plattform für Veränderungen im Rechtsmarkt. Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, (Ausgabe 20):15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform revolution. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler D (2017). LIQUID LEGAL Manifesto: changing the state of aggregation in legal. In: Liquid legal, pp 423–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind R (2014a) A response to the more for Less Dilemma. The Practice 1(1). Available at: https://thepractice.law.harvard.edu/article/speakers-corner-richard-susskind/

  • Susskind R (2014b) Tomorrow’s lawyers. Def Counsel J 10:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoë Andreae .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andreae, Z. (2020). The Common Legal Platform Revolution. In: Jacob, K., Schindler, D., Strathausen, R. (eds) Liquid Legal. Law for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48266-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48266-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48265-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48266-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics