Abstract
The common legal platform revolution will accelerate the already ongoing digital transformation and disruption of the legal industry. This chapter of “Liquid Legal - Towards a Common Legal Platform” will provide a comprehensive and practical approach to the design and architecture of the common legal platform. The common legal platform is intended for legal professionals that are interested in advancing the legal industry as a whole through collaboration. It is meant to be open and neutral, trustworthy and secure, globally scalable and user-centric. The chapter will propose designs for the functionality and core interaction of the common legal platform, defining its participants, value unit and filters. The significance of network effects, especially positive same-side and cross-side network effects, will be explored, as well as how frictionless entry and side switching may maximize the value-building impact of network effects. The concepts of pull mechanisms and positive feedback loops, and of mechanisms for facilitating platform interactions and for effective user matching will be discussed. These concepts collectively attract and keep users on the common legal platform by facilitating the creation of mutually rewarding interactions and exchanges. The degree of openness of the common legal platform with respect to manager and sponsor participation, developer participation and user participation will be calibrated, involving the use of APIs and curation. The technology of the common legal platform will be examined, recommending the adherence to the end-to-end principle, as well as to extremely high standards for IT, network and data security as well as data protection and especially GDPR compliance to ensure users may trust in securely participating on the common legal platform. The path of evolution of the common legal platform will be implied, considering how over time more types of interactions may be added to the platform in order to generate further value for its users and to attract new types of participants. Finally, this chapter invites all stakeholders of the legal industry to participate in shaping the common legal platform revolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Jacob et al. (2017b), p. xx.
- 5.
- 6.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 38.
- 7.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 8.
Parker et al. (2016), pp. 38–39.
- 9.
Parker et al. (2016), pp. 39–40.
- 10.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 17.
- 11.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 34.
- 12.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 13.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 14.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 15.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 44.
- 16.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 45.
- 17.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 18.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 19.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 45.
- 20.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 21.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 22.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 48.
- 23.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 24.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 25.
Eisenmann et al. (2009).
- 26.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 27.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 135.
- 28.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 135.
- 29.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 30.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 138.
- 31.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 32.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 141.
- 33.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 142.
- 34.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 143.
- 35.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 145.
- 36.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 145.
- 37.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 38.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.
- 39.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 40.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.
- 41.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 151.
- 42.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 52.
- 43.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 54.
- 44.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 55.
- 45.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 46.
Parker et al. (2016).
- 47.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 78.
- 48.
Parker et al. (2016), p. 289.
- 49.
- 50.
Andreae (2016).
- 51.
- 52.
Andreae (2016).
References
Andreae Z (2016) The role of legal tech startups in the digital transformation of the German legal industry. ESADE Business School
Eisenmann TR, Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2009) Opening platforms: how, when and why? In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Jacob K (2017) Jetzt ist der Zeitpunkt zum Handeln. Warum wir eine Kollaborationsplattform für den gesamten Rechtsmarkt brauchen. Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, (Ausgabe 14):16–19
Jacob K, Schindler D, Strathausen R (2017a) Liquid legal. Springer International Publishing (Management for Professionals), Cham
Jacob K, Schindler D, & Strathausen R (2017b) Preface. In: Liquid legal. Springer International Publishing (Management for Professionals), Cham, p. xx
Jacob K, Schindler D, Waltl B (2019) We are open and creating tomorrow’s legal. A close-up look at the Liquid Legal Institute e.V. Bus Law Mag 2:7–10
Kuhlmann N (2017) Die digitale Rechtsabteilung – Interview mit Kai Jacob (SAP). Legal Tech Blog
Liquid Legal Institute e.V. (2018) Let’s design the Future! Liquid Legal Institute: die neue Plattform für Veränderungen im Rechtsmarkt. Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, (Ausgabe 20):15–16
Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform revolution. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Schindler D (2017). LIQUID LEGAL Manifesto: changing the state of aggregation in legal. In: Liquid legal, pp 423–454
Susskind R (2014a) A response to the more for Less Dilemma. The Practice 1(1). Available at: https://thepractice.law.harvard.edu/article/speakers-corner-richard-susskind/
Susskind R (2014b) Tomorrow’s lawyers. Def Counsel J 10:327–332
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andreae, Z. (2020). The Common Legal Platform Revolution. In: Jacob, K., Schindler, D., Strathausen, R. (eds) Liquid Legal. Law for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48266-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48266-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48265-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48266-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)