Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Experimental Film and Artists’ Moving Image ((EFAMI))

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction establishes the book’s focus on memory and intermediality in contemporary artists’ moving image. It gives an overview of the frameworks of memory culture that inform the discussion of these practices in the 1990s and 2000s. Intermediality is defined as a dynamic and evolving set of relationships between media and their cultural associations. The currency of the term ‘moving image’ is examined in relation to the previous histories of artists’ film and video and the economy and distribution of moving image artworks. An overview of the book’s chapters identifies five overlapping mnemonic modes based on individual artist’s moving image practices: ‘critical nostalgia’, ‘database narrative’, ‘the echo-chamber’, ‘documentary fiction’ and ‘mediatized memories’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arnold-de Simine, Silke. 2013. Mediating Memory in the Museum: Empathy, Trauma, Nostalgia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsom, Erika. 2013a. Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. ‘Original Copies: How Film and Video Became Art Objects’. Cinema Journal 53 (1): 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. After Uniqueness: A History of Film and Video Art in Circulation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 1991. Matter and Memory [1896]. Translated by Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, Daniel. 2005. Chronology. New York: Lukas & Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boym, Svetlana. 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Maeve. 2009. The Place of Artists’ Cinema: Space, Site and Screen. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1997. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2005. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erll, Astrid. 2011. Memory in Culture. Translated by Sara B. Young. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Hal. 2002. ‘This Funeral Is for the Wrong Corpse’. In Design and Crime: And Other Diatribes, 123–43. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Translated by Lewis A. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houwen, Janna. 2017. Film and Video Intermediality: The Question of Medium Specificity in Contemporary Moving Images. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, Andreas. 1995. Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jihoon. 2016. Between Film, Video, and the Digital: Hybrid Moving Images in the Post-Media Age. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Translated by Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Alison. 2004. Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütticken, Sven. 2009. ‘Viewing Copies: On the Mobility of Moving Images’. E-Flux 8 (September): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. History in Motion: Time in the Age of the Moving Image. Berlin: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, Pierre. 1989. ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’. Translated by Marc Roudebush. Representations, no. 26: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520.

  • Osborne, Peter. 2013. Anywhere or Not at All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethö, Ágnes. 2011. Cinema and Intermediality: The Passion for the in-Between. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radstone, Susannah. 2010. ‘Cinema and Memory’. In Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, edited by Susannah Radstone and Bill Schwarz. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2006. Film Fables. Translated by Emiliano Battista. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Christine. 2014. The Past Is the Present, It’s the Future Too: The Temporal Turn in Contemporary Art. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlinger, Mike, and Ian White, eds. 2008. Kinomuseum: Towards an Artists’ Cinema. Cologne: Walther König.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Durcan, S. (2021). Introduction. In: Memory and Intermediality in Artists’ Moving Image. Experimental Film and Artists’ Moving Image. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47396-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics