Skip to main content

The City for Starters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conceptualizing Biblical Cities
  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

The opening chapter lines out its main research question: what is a city according to the Hebrew Bible? How is it conceptualized, as a category, and how is this category given form in the text with specific language and given a role within a particular part of the text? The introduction also explains the starting points of the study. Furthermore, it offers a short overview of previous studies on (urban) space in the Hebrew Bible by means of three key issues: the negative portrayal of cities, the city-as-woman and the centrality of Jerusalem. It concludes with the further organization of the volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Studies include but are not limited to Steck (1989, repr. 1992), Biddle (1991), Galambush (1992), Darr (1994), Day (1995), Heim (1999), Sals (2004), Maier (2008c), Low (2013) and Anthonioz (2014).

  2. 2.

    Gray explicitly addresses the container image as a conceptual metaphor on a par with that of the personified city. Others have pointed out other metaphors for the city in the biblical corpus, although less extensively or specifically as urban metaphor next to the female city. In her study of gendered language in warfare, Cynthia Chapman, for example, states at a certain point that other images occur to express the relationship with the Assyrians, such as, the lion, the flood, or locusts. Yet, after a short discussion, she concludes that the personified relationship offers more opportunities and is more widespread in the corpus (2004, 68). Also in Christl Maier’s study of Jerusalem, it seems that at least one other metaphor is present, that of the city as height, or as she names it, “the sacred mountain.” Maier identifies this image, which she never calls a metaphor or a conceptual metaphor, as typical of preexilic traditions of Jerusalem’s depiction (2008c, 30–59). The conceptual level in her analysis is formed by “identifying the mountain [i.e., the physical mountain on which Jerusalem is located] with Zaphon, the traditional divine abode in Syria, and by relating Jerusalem implicitly to the city surrounded by water, the Mesopotamian temple city” (59). Another example of other metaphors, or at least a suggestion of them, can be found in Stephen Bennett’s piece in The City in the Hebrew Bible (2018, 220–23). In his section ‘Conception of the City’, Bennett discusses conceptions of the biblical city, following John Rogerson’s lead (2009, 21–39). However, a closer look at the analysis of Bennett reveals that the conceptions are closely connected to particular stories, and that they, if expressing larger categories rather than individual ideas, are cityscapes, thus applied concepts rather than the concepts themselves. He mentions, among others, the city as “symbol of human rebellion,” “symbol of greed and oppression,” “symbol of universal peace and justice,” and “a link between heaven and earth” (2018, 220–21).

  3. 3.

    This does not mean that reading for historical space in the Hebrew Bible is not valid or useful. Rather the plea is one for a similar self-evidence for literary space. Both have their merits.

  4. 4.

    Mary Mills notes “cities [i.e., textual cities] are constructed via imaginative responses to the space that the urban environment offers” (2012, x).

  5. 5.

    For a problematizing of these contradictions, see, among others, O’Connor (2008, 18–39). Christopher Meredith and Elaine James both adopt approaches that allow textual space to be and remain ambiguous (Meredith 2013; James 2017b). They are accompanied by many modern literary studies of cities, which emphasize the tension present in cities (Anderson 2018, 64–65). Anderson mentions for that matter the works by Oakes (1997), Festa-McCormick (1979), Preston and Simpson-Housley (1994), Lehan (1998) and Alter (2005), but various other titles can be added. A simple look at introductory volumes such as The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and the City (2016) and The Routledge Handbook of Literature and Space (2017) reveals the same paradoxes and complex presentation of urban space.

  6. 6.

    Examples include but are not limited to Frick (1977), Fritz (1990), Herzog (1992), Auffrecht et al. (1997), Arav (2008), and Wilson (2018).

  7. 7.

    See, among others, Ollenburger (1987), Hoppe (2000), and Tilly (2002).

  8. 8.

    For a short overview of literary approaches to biblical narrative space, see Jiang (2018, 25–28). In addition to Bar Efrat (1989, 184–96), a temporal focus can be found in Jan Fokkelman’s work on biblical narrative (1999, 97–111). Luke Gärtner-Brereton has argued against these works and for a more central position of space in biblical narrative, “treating ‘space’ itself as determinate within the biblical text, rather than an ancillary or secondary characteristic” (2008, 5). He is not the first one to do so, as can be seen in Michael Fishbane’s work Biblical Text and Texture, in which both the Garden of Eden and the Exodus are considered as unifying motifs within the biblical corpus rather than simple and unimportant spatial references (1998, 111–40). Likewise, Yairah Amit argues for a reading of biblical space not as “a historical record” but as “always functional … in the story” (2001, 119, 125).

  9. 9.

    William Millar explores this merger, with a Bakhtinian ring, explicitly and this in light of social space (2007).

  10. 10.

    Both shifts take place in the 1970s and 1980s, with the work by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (2003/1980) as exemplary for the cognitive turn and that by Henri Lefebvre (1974), Yi-Fu Tuan (1977) and Michel Foucault (1984) as paramount for the spatial turn. What is more, cognitive studies pay particular attention to the spatial fundaments of cognition and language in particular (e.g., Haspelmath 1997; Levinson 2003; Evans and Chilton 2009).

  11. 11.

    The cognitive turn itself entailed much more than a focus on ‘metaphors we live by,’ however, in biblical and religious studies this is the idea that has had the most impact. Witness the fact that there are various volumes applying cognitive metaphor theory or conceptual blending to the biblical corpus, but virtually none that adopt cognitive grammar or possible worlds theory. For the former, see, among others, Macky (1990), Van Hecke (2005), Hayes (2008), Jindo (2010), and Howe and Green (2014). To be fair, cognitive grammar does feature in one of the essays in Howe and Green by Ellen van Wolde (2014, 193–222) as well as in van Wolde’s monograph Reframing Biblical Studies (2009). However, she forms the exception rather than the rule.

  12. 12.

    Pace, for example, Galambush (1992, 6–9), Maier (2008c, 19–210), Low (2013, 7–20).

  13. 13.

    This framework will be introduced more fully in the next chapter. The book series ‘Constructions of Space’ forms an excellent starting point to see the framework’s adoption as well as adaptation in the biblical field (Berquist and Camp 2007, 2008; George 2013; Prinsloo and Maier 2013; Økland, de Vos, and Wenell 2016). Similarly informative is the edited volume by David Gunn and Paula McNutt (2002).

  14. 14.

    Nicolae Roddy traces this anti-urban tone throughout the whole Hebrew Bible, concluding: “From the vantage point of Israel’s exiled seers and visionaries, the city remains little more than an inherently incomplete, human-made construct of magnificent emptiness and fleeting shadow” (2008, 21). Earlier, potentially positive city views are negatively colored in later rereadings and editions, according to him.

  15. 15.

    Many scholars defend this position (e.g., Sarna 1989, 80; Hamilton 1990, 356; Arnold 2009, 118–19), although it has been challenged in the past decades, in particular by the studies by Ellen van Wolde (2000) and Theodore Hiebert (2007). Whereas the new readings move away from the idea that Gen 11:1–9 was a story of pride and punishment, their proposed reading (as that of a story of the earth focusing on the origin of multiple languages and peoples) still contains an anti-urban ring. God favors the earth over the city, and diversity over unity. Nevertheless, Hiebert concludes “it is doubtful whether the Bible contains any true anti-urban ideology at all” (2007, 40).

  16. 16.

    Carroll, for example, observes that Jerusalem is the city that is portrayed negatively and positively, whereas all other city spaces only appear in negative circumstances (2001, 49).

  17. 17.

    Figure-ground dynamics are used in cognitive stylistics to explain how readers’ attention shifts during reading. The terms are adopted from visual arts and Gestalt psychology (Stockwell 2002, 13–26).

  18. 18.

    Maier points out that “many interpretations, especially feminist ones, focus too much on the negative depiction of the female character without taking into account that the body of this ‘woman’ at the same time represents the space of a city, and even a particular city” (2008c, 112).

  19. 19.

    The terms ‘text-world’ and ‘discourse-world’ are central in Text World Theory, developed in the 1990s by Paul Werth (1999) and further elaborated upon in the 2000s by Joanna Gavins (2007). Simply put, readers juggle two worlds when they read a text: the world in which the characters live, the text-world; and the world in which they themselves are reading the text, the discourse-world. Neither of these worlds is singular or static, meaning that the text-world is constantly updated as readers are given new information. What is more, texts create several text-worlds through which readers have to navigate; for example, when writers include a character’s dream or thoughts, the matrix text-world is temporarily left. As far as discourse-worlds go, the biblical text has had many over the ages. The discourse-world that has received most attention is that of the original audience.

  20. 20.

    It suffices to consult any given commentary on, for example, Isaiah, to find that city references are often disambiguated as either city or people. Some studies even make the distinction crucial to their overall argument (e.g., Low 2013).

Bibliography

  • Aitken, James K. 2018. “Introduction: A City Perspective.” Pages 3–16 in The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. Edited by James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow. LHBOTS 672. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, Robert. 2005. Imagined Cities: Urban Experience and the Language of the Novel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, Yairah. 2001. Reading Biblical Narratives: Literary Criticism and the Hebrew Bible. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Bradford A. 2018. “Mapping Narrative Complexity: Textural Geography, Literary Studies and the City in the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 55–72 in The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. Edited by James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow. LHBOTS 672. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthonioz, Stéphanie. 2014. “Cities of Glory and Cities of Pride: Concepts, Gender and Images of Cities in Mesopotamia and in Ancient Israel.” Pages 21–42 in Memory and the City in Ancient Israel. Edited by Diana V. Edelman and Ehud Ben Zvi. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arav, Rami, ed. 2008. Cities Through the Looking Glass: Essays on the History and Archaeology of Biblical Urbanism. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Bill T. 2009. Genesis. The New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auffrecht, Walter G., Neil A. Mirau, and Steven W. Gauley. 1997. Aspects of Urbanism in Antiquity: From Mesopotamia to Crete. JSOTSup 244. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Michael M. 1981. “Forms of Time and the Chronotope of the Novel.” Pages 84–258 in The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Edited by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar Efrat, Simon. 1989. Narrative Art in the Bible. Sheffield: Almond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen J. 2018. “Among the Ruins of a Walled City: Reflections on War and Peace in Ecclesiastes 12:1–7.” Pages 217–34 in The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. Edited by James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow. LHBOTS 672. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berquist, Jon L., and Claudia V. Camp, eds. 2007. Constructions of Space I: Theory, Geography, and Narrative. LHBOTS 481. New York: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berquist, Jon L., and Claudia V. Camp, eds. 2008. Constructions of Space II: The Biblical City and Other Imagined Spaces. LHBOTS 490. New York: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuken, Willem A. M. 2011. “From Damascus to Mount Zion.” Pages 63–80 in Enlarge the Site of Your Tent: The City as Unifying Theme in Isaiah. Edited by Annemarieke van der Woude and Archibald L. H. M. van Wieringen. OTS 58. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Mark E. 1991. “The Figure of Lady Jerusalem: Identification, Deification and Personification of Cities in the Ancient Near East.” Pages 173–94 in The Biblical Canon in Comparative Perspective: Scripture in Context IV. Edited by K. Lawson Younger, William W. Hallo, and Bernard F. Batto. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Mark. 1992. “Lady Zion’s Alter Egos: Isaiah 47:1–15 and 57:6–13 as Structural Counterparts.” Pages 124–39 in New Visions of the Book of Isaiah. Edited by Roy F. Melugin and Marvin A. Sweeney. JSOTSup 214. Sheffield: JSOT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Athalya. 1996. “On ‘Jeremiah’ and the Poetics of (Prophetic?) Pornography.” Pages 178–93 in On Gendering Texts: Female and Male Voices in the Hebrew Bible. Edited by Athalya Brenner and Fokkelien van Dijk-Hemmes Brenner. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Robert P. 2001. “City of Chaos, City of Stone, City of Flesh: Urbanscapes in Prophetic Discourses.” Pages 45–61 in ‘Every City Shall Be Forsaken’: Urbanism and Prophecy in Ancient Israel and the Near East. Edited by Lester L. Grabbe and Robert D. Haak. JSOTSup 330. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Cynthia R. 2004. The Gendered Language of Warfare in the Israelite-Assyrian Encounter. HSM 62. Leiden/New York: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, Katherine P. 1994. Isaiah’s Vision and the Family of God. Literary Currents in Biblical Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Peggy L. 1995. “The Personification of Cities as Female in the Hebrew Bible: The Thesis of Aloysius Fitzgerald, F.S.C.” Pages 283–302 in Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in Global Perspective. Vol 2 of Reading from This Place. Edited by Fernando F. Segovia and Mary Ann Tolbert. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs-Allsopp, Frederick W. 2009. “Daughter Zion.” Pages 125–34 in Thus Says the Lord: Essays on the Former and Latter Prophets in Honor of Robert R. Wilson. Edited by John J. Ahn and Stephen L. Cook. OTS 502. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Vyvyan, and Paul Chilton, eds. 2009. Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. Advances in Cognitive Linguistics. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exum, Cheryl. 1996. Plotted, Shot, and Painted: Cultural Representations of Biblical Women. JSOTSup 215. Gender, Culture, Theory 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-McCormick, Diana. 1979. The City as Catalyst: A Study of Ten Novels. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, Michael. 1998/1979. Biblical Text and Texture: A Literary Reading of Selected Texts. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokkelman, Jan P. 1999. Reading Biblical Narrative: An Introductory Guide. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Des espaces autres: Hétérotopies.” Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5: 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, Frank S. 1977. The City in Ancient Israel. SBLDS 36. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, Volkmar. 1990. Die Stadt im Alten Israel. Beck’s Archäologische Bibliothek. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambush, Julie. 1992. Jerusalem in the Book of Ezekiel: The City as Yahweh’s Wife. SBLDS 130. Atlanta: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner-Brereton, Luke. 2008. The Ontology of Space in Biblical Hebrew Narrative: The Determinative Function of Narrative “Space” within the Biblical Hebrew Aesthetic. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Mark K, ed. 2013. Constructions of Space IV: Further Developments in Examining Ancient Israel’s Social Space. LHBOTS 569. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomel, Elana. 2014. Narrative Space and Time: Representing Impossible Topologies in Literature. Routledge Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Literature 25. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Alison R. 2018. “Reflections on the Meaning(s) of עיר in the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 17–34 in The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. Edited by James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow. LHBOTS 672. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Barbara. 2012. “Cognitive Linguistics and the ‘Idolatry-Is-Adultery’ Metaphor of Jeremiah 2–3.” Pages 11–38 in Daughter Zion: Her Portrait, Her Response. Edited by Mark J. Boda, Carol J. Dempsey, and LeAnn Snow Flesher. AIL 13. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, David M., and Paula M. McNutt, eds. 2002. “Imagining” Biblical Worlds: Studies in Spatial, Social and Historical Constructs in Honor of James W. Flanagan. JSOTSup 359. London/New York: Sheffield Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Victor P. 1990. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1–17. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 2. München/Newcastle: LINCOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Elizabeth R. 2008. The Pragmatics of Perception and Cognition in MT Jeremiah 1:1–6:30: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. BZAW 380. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Knut M. 1999. “The Personification of Jerusalem and the Drama of Her Bereavement in Lamentations.” Pages 129–69 in Zion, City of Our God. Edited by Richard S. Hess and Gordon J. Wenham. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Ze’ev. 1992. “Cities in the Levant.” ABD I: 1032–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, Theodore. 2007. “The Tower of Babel and the Origin of the World’s Cultures.” JBL 126, 1: 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Leslie J. 2000. The Holy City: Jerusalem in the Theology of the Old Testament. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Bonnie, and Joel Green, eds. 2014. Cognitive Linguistic Explorations in Biblical Studies. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Elaine. 2017a. “Battle of the Sexes: Gender and the City in the Song of Songs.” JSOT 42, 1: 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Elaine. 2017b. Landscapes of the Song of Songs: Poetry and Place. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Zhenshuai. 2018. Critical Spatiality in Genesis 1–11. FAT 2.99. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindo, Job Y. 2010. Biblical Metaphor Reconsidered: A Cognitive Approach to Poetic Prophecy in Jeremiah 1–24. HSM 64. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Brad E. 2008. “Wartime Rhetoric: Prophetic Metaphorization of Cities as Female.” Pages 95–111 in Writing and Reading War: Rhetoric, Ethics and Gender in Biblical and Modern Contexts. Edited by Brad E. Kelle and Frank R. Ames. Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 42. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003/1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. La production de l’espace. Paris: Editions Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehan, Richard. 1998. The City in Literature: An Intellectual and Cultural History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, Maggie. 2013. Mother Zion in Deutero-Isaiah: A Metaphor for Zion Theology. StBibLit 155. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macky, Peter W. 1990. The Centrality of Metaphors to Biblical Thought: A Method for Interpreting the Bible. Studies in the Bible and Early Christianity 19. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Christl M. 2008c. Daughter Zion, Mother Zion: Gender, Space, and the Sacred in Ancient Israel. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, Christopher. 2013. Journeys in the Songscape: Space and the Song of Songs. Hebrew Bible Monographs 53. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, William R. 2007. “A Bakhtinian Reading of Narrative Space and Its Relationship to Social Space.” Pages 129–40 in Constructions of Space I: Theory, Geography, and Narrative. Edited by Jon L. Berquist and Claudia V. Camp. LHBOTS 481. New York/London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Mary E. 2012. Urban Imagination in Biblical Prophecy. LHBOTS 560. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Julia M. 2008. Challenging Prophetic Metaphor: Theology and Ideology in the Prophets. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Michael P. 2008. “The Biblical Notion of City.” Pages 18–39 in Constructions of Space II: The Biblical City and Other Imagined Spaces. Edited by Jon L. Berquist and Claudia V. Camp. LHBOTS 490. New York: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, Timothy. 1997. “Place and the Paradox of Modernity.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87: 509–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland, Jorunn, Cornelis de Vos, and Karen J. Wenell, eds. 2016. Constructions of Space III: Biblical Spatiality and the Sacred. LHBOTS 540. London: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollenburger, Ben C. 1987. Zion, City of the Great King: A Theological Symbol of the Jerusalem Cult. JSOTSup 41. Sheffield: JSOT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Peter, and Paul Simpson-Housley, eds. 1994. Writing the City: Eden, Babylon, and the New Jerusalem. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, Gert T. M., and Christl M. Maier, eds. 2013. Constructions of Space V: Place, Space and Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean World. LHBOTS 576. New York/London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyper, Hugh. 2018. “The Biblical Metropolis.” Pages 35–52 in The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. Edited by James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow. LHBOTS 672. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roddy, Nicolae. 2008. “Landscape of Shadows: The Image of City in the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 11–21 in Cities Through the Looking Glass: Essays on the History and Archaeology of Biblical Urbanism. Edited by Rami Arav. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, John W. 2009. “Part 1: The City in the Old Testament.” Pages 3–45 in The City in Biblical Perspective. Edited by John W. Rogerson and John Vincent. Biblical Challenges in the Contemporary World. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sals, Ulrike. 2004. Sals, Ulrike. Die Biographie derHure Babylon: Studien zur Intertextualität der Babylon-Texte in der Bibel. FAT 2.6. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarna, Nahum M. 1989. Genesis = Be-rēšit: The Traditional Hebrew Text with New JPS Translation and Commentary by Nahum M. Sarna. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steck, Odil H. 1992. “Zion als Gelände und Gestalt: Überlegungen zur Wahrnehmung Jerusalems als Stadt und Frau im Alten Testament.” Pages 126–45 in Gottesknecht und Zion: Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Deuterojesaja. FAT 4. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Prepr. from ZTK 86 (1989): 261–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieber, Nancy. 2012. “Metaphor and Metropolis.” Uhlenbeck Lecture 30 presented at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Wassenaar, 30 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Michael. 2002. Jerusalem—Nabel der Welt: Überlieferung und Funktionen von Heiligtumstraditionen im antiken Judentum. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hecke, Pierre, ed. 2005. Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible. BETL 187. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieringen, Archibald L. H. M. 2011. “Assur and Babel against Jerusalem: The Reader-Oriented Position of Babel and Assur within the Framework of Isaiah 1–39.” Pages 49–62 in Enlarge the Site of Your Tent: The City as Unifying Theme in Isaiah. Edited by Annemarieke vdn Der Woude and Archibald L. H. M. van Wieringen. OTS 58. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolde, Ellen. 2000. “The Earth Story as Presented by the Tower of Babel Narrative.” Pages 147–57 in The Earth Story in Genesis. Edited by Norman C. Habel and Shirley Wurst. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolde, Ellen. 2009. Reframing Biblical Studies: When Language and Text Meet Culture, Cognition, and Context. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolde, Ellen. 2014. “Cognitive Grammar at Work in Sodom and Gomorrah.” Pages 193–222 in Cognitive Linguistic Explorations in Biblical Studies. Edited by Bonnie Howe and Joel Green. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Ian D. 2018. History and the Hebrew Bible: Culture, Narrative, and Memory. Brill Research Perspectives. Biblical Interpretation. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolien Vermeulen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vermeulen, K. (2020). The City for Starters. In: Conceptualizing Biblical Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45270-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45270-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45269-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45270-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics