Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies of Organized Crime ((SOOC,volume 19))

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

Financial dependencies and advertising tactics have the potential to erode the independence of medical professionals and influence their clinical decisions. Described in Chaps. 2 and 3, most of the literature on undue pharmaceutical industry influence in medicine discusses unethical marketing practices and how doctors are either bribed by companies or seduced by sales representatives. Since most research focuses on individual greed as the basis for corruption and bribery, most laws and regulations seeking to curtail industry influence concentrate on legally making transparent, minimizing or prohibiting exchanges of money between companies and individual physicians. While rules that curtail financial ties and constrain advertising practices are an important step towards minimizing industry influence and maintaining medical professional independence, the regulations have fallen short in that financial relationships between doctors and pharmaceutical companies prevail, if only being hidden by physicians and the industry alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://transparantieregister.nl/Wat-wel-en-niet-geregistreerd: “For participation in meetings, healthcare providers can receive a travel, subsistence and subscription fee from a company for participation in this meeting. Individual hospitality will be part of the CGR’s transparency rules from 2015 and these relations will be published for the first time in 2016.”.

  2. 2.

    OECD statistics: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_REAC#.

  3. 3.

    Health: Health Care Resources: Remuneration of health professionals: https://stats.oecd.org.

  4. 4.

    www.halapenznelkul.hu.

  5. 5.

    It is important to note, that the data regarding payments to healthcare providers includes payments made to nurses (3%), pharmacists (3%), and payments made to veterinarians (less than 1%). All other financial relationships concern medical doctors, the majority of which are specialists (Transparantieregister Zorg 2015, 2016).

  6. 6.

    There is some slight variation between the exact amounts paid to doctors listed in the CGR report and de Volkskrant’s data for various types of sponsorship/service agreements. The journalists explain that this is because a complete list of physicians in the Netherlands is not accessible to the public, and that the list of physicians had to be constructed from a so-called “care card” and through the Dutch Patient’s Organization. Additionally, journalists excluded general practitioners, vets, nurses, and dentists, and also chose 16 specialists whom they deemed high prescribers, excluding specialisms less interesting to industry (i.e. pathologists). Despite variations in methodologies, the amounts roughly converge with that of the CGR data, both in amounts, but also percentage dispersion. For additional confirmation I also contacted the CGR directly, who confirmed that the data from de Volkskrant were accurate (confirmation via email from CGR representative 17 May 2017).

  7. 7.

    It is also interesting to note that the industry funding of medical associations for sponsoring medical educational events resembles this analysis in so far as the medical associations that received the most funding for medical event sponsorships also reflect a similar preference for specialist area (e.g. dermatology, cardiology, rheumatology, internal medicine, etc., see Chap. 8).

  8. 8.

    https://www.drugs.com/international/pantoprazole.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2019.

  9. 9.

    A specialist may prescribe a drug, but if the medication is such that the patient has to take it for longer periods of time i.e. anti-cholesterol medication, then the patient simply goes to the GP to have the prescription re-filled.

  10. 10.

    CRO Quintiles merged with IMS Health in 2016, and since November 2017 is known as IQVIA (www.iquivia.com), specializing in service provision across the board: medical research and development, real-world value outcomes, commercialization, and technology.

  11. 11.

    Hungarian Continuing Medical Education database OFTEX: https://ww.oftex.hu.

  12. 12.

    Congressline website: https://www.congressline.hu.

  13. 13.

    See table on payments to Hungarian medical Associations: Hungarian Gynaecological Society received 86,614 HUF of which 100% went to sponsoring of a medical educational event.

  14. 14.

    Magyar Nőorvos Társaság IV. Szakmai Továbbképző Tanfolyama, 2017 május 26–27, Siófok, Hotel Azúr: https://www.congressline.hu/mnt2017/szakmai-kiallitas.php.

  15. 15.

    https://cmt.info.hu/Nyitooldal.

  16. 16.

    https://www.promenade.hu/referenciak.

  17. 17.

    Besloten Vennootschap (NL), Egyéni Vállakozó (HUN).

  18. 18.

    Beroepen in de individuele gezondheidszorg (individual occupational registration number).

  19. 19.

    https://transzparencia.org/kozzeteteli-adatok. Accessed 23 July 2019.

  20. 20.

    25 being the minimum, being that subsidiary firms might also be subject to transparency regulations without being listed on the AIPM website. Those disclosure reports are in turn available on separate subsidiary websites.

References

Books/Articles/Reports

Legislation/Code

    EU

    • EFPIA Code of Practice. (2019). European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. Adopted by the EFPIA Board on 22 March 2019, and ratified by the EFPIA Statutory General Assembly of 27 June 2019. Retrieved November 19, 2019, from https://www.efpia.eu/media/413022/efpia-code-2019.pdf.

    • EFPIA Code on disclosure of transfers of value from pharmaceutical companies to healthcare professionals and healthcare organisations. Approved by the General Assembly of 6 June 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2019, from https://www.efpia.eu/media/25837/efpia-disclosure-code.pdf.

    • Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 311, 28.11.2001, 67–128.

      Google Scholar 

    Hungary

    • A gyógyszer-kommunikáció etikai kódexe (GyKEK). Elfogadta a Magyarországi Gyógyszergyártók Országos Szövetsége, az Innovatív Gyógyszergyártók Egyesülete, a Generikus Gyógyszergyártók és Forgalmazók Magyarországi Érdekvédelmi Egyesülete és a “Védettség” Oltóanyag és Immunbiológiai Termék Gyártók és Forgalmazók Egyesülete. Érvényes 2017. július 1-től [Code of Ethics for Pharmaceutical Marketing Communications. Adopted by The Hungarian Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors, the Association of Innovative Pharmaceutical Manufacturers; The Generic Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors; and “Immunity”, The Vaccine and Immunobiology Product Manufacturers Association. Entered into force on 1 July 2017]. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://aipm.hu/data/upload/files/Gy%C3%B3gyszer-kommunik%C3%A1ci%C3%B3%20Etikai%20K%C3%B3dexe_2017_07_01.pdf.

    • Az Egészségügyi Szakembereknek és az Egészségügyi Szervezeteknek nyújtott juttatások közzétételéről szóló Transparencia Kódex [Transparency Code on the disclosure of Transfer of Value to Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare organizations], AIPM Transparency Code (2015) 1. számú melléklet: https://aipm.hu/data/upload/files/E.3.4%20K%C3%B6zz%C3%A9t%C3%A9teli%20adatlap.pdf.

    • 2006. évi XCVIII. törvény a biztonságos és gazdaságos gyógyszer- és gyógyászatisegédeszköz-ellátás, valamint a gyógyszerforgalmazás általános szabályairól, GyTV [Act XCVIII of 2006 on the General Provisions Relating to the Reliable and Economically Feasible Supply of Medicinal Products and Medical Aids and on the Distribution of Medicinal Products].

      Google Scholar 

    The Netherlands

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    Authors

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Anna Laskai .

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

    About this chapter

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this chapter

    Laskai, A. (2020). Institutional Corruption of Medical Knowledge Application. In: Institutional Corruption Theory in Pharmaceutical Industry-Medicine Relationships. Studies of Organized Crime, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44790-8_9

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44790-8_9

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

    • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44789-2

    • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44790-8

    • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics