Abstract
In this chapter, we elaborate on conceptual and theoretical ideas concerning the development of the dialogical self from a cultural psychology perspective. We start by conceiving the dialogical self as an open system since it presents all the characteristics of such systems. Among others, it shows a dynamic, ever-developing complex structure, which features both stability and change deriving from centripetal and centrifugal forces. The Dialogical Self System is, also, in permanent exchange with many aspects of its cultural environment, which entails a continuous movement of emergence, transformation, and dissolution of its multiple components, characterized by a high degree of interdependence and connectivity. Therefore, we refer to the dialogical self as the Dialogical Self System-DSS. As its key characteristic, we underline the fact that the DSS’s emergence and development take place as a result of its interactions and relations with alterity, or otherness, which happens when the DSS relates to affective-significant social others. The DSS encompasses a multiplicity of positionings co-constructed in the space–time dimension, which we denominate as Dynamic Self-Positionings (DSP). We elaborated on this construct as we tried to make sense of the DSS development during our research with children and young adolescents. While carrying out such studies, we faced the need for a more field-like and dynamic component of the DSS, to better describe the data that emerged in our co-construction with the young participants. Here we analyze the role of other fruitful concepts—Affective-Semiotic Fields—and the dynamics between the I-self dimensions of the system. We endeavor to identify, analyze, and discuss the role of tensions and the affective-semiotic negotiations occurring as the DSS develops along its trajectory in the irreversible time. Other aspects pertaining to the DSS addressed in this chapter are the analysis of factors promoting change versus the relative continuity of the system, the latter being responsible for the sense of self unity/wholeness throughout life. In sum, our goal is to elaborate, at a theoretical level, on the structural and dynamic nature, and quality of the Dynamic Self-Positionings, therefore contributing to the advancement of a theoretical perspective on the development of the dialogical self.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertau, M. C. (2008). Voice: A pathway to consciousness as “social contact to oneself.” Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Sciences, 42, 92–113.
Bertau, M. C. & Gonçalves, M. (2007). Looking at “meaning as movement” in development: Introductory reflections on the developmental origins of the dialogical self. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2(1), 1–13.
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making, and reasoning. In J. D. Houver & D. Hermans (Eds.), Cognition and emotion: Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 276–324). New York: Psychology Press.
Branco, A. U. (2016). Values and their ways of guiding the psyche. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama manifesto (pp. 225–244). London: Springer.
Branco, A. U. & Freire, S. (2010). Dialogical self from a developmental perspective: The role of affective fields in the integration of the system. Paper presented at the VI International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Athens, Greece, September.
Branco, A. U., & Lopes-de-Oliveira, M. C. (2018). Alterity, values and socialization. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Branco, A. U., & Valsiner, J. (2012). Cultural psychology of human values. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Branco, A. U., Branco, A. L. & Madureira, A. F. (2009). Self development and the emergence of new I-positions: Emotions and self-dynamics. Studia Psychologica (Bratislava), 6, 23–40.
Bruner, J. (1993). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. London: Sage.
Freire, S. F. C. D. (2008). Concepções Dinâmicas de Si de crianças em escolarização: uma perspectiva dialógico-desenvolvimental [Children’s dynamic self conceptions during schooling process: A dialogical developmental perspective]. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Brasília, Brazil.
Freire, S. F. C. D., & Branco, A. U. (2016). O self dialógico em desenvolvimento: Um estudo sobre as concepções dinâmicas de si em crianças [The developing dialogic self: A study on children’s Dynamic Self Conceptions]. Psicologia USP, 27(2), 168–177.
Gone, J., Miller, P., & Rappaport, J. (1999). Conceptual self as normatively oriented: The suitability of past personal narrative for the study of cultural identity. Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 371–398.
Hermans, H. (2001a). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281.
Hermans, H. (2001b). The construction of a personal position repertoire: Method and practice. Culture & Psychology, 7, 323–365.
Hermans, H. (2014). Self as a society of I-Positions: A dialogical approach to counseling. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 53(2), 134–159.
Hermans, H., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H., & Gieser, T. (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H., Kemper, H. J., & van Loon, R. J. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23–33.
Hermans, H., Konopka, A., Oosterwegel, A., & Zomer, P. (2017). Fields of tension in a boundary-crossing world: Towards a democratic organization of the self. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51, 505–535.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row. Kurtines.
Komatsu, K. (2010). Emergence of young children’s presentational self in daily conversation and its semiotic foundation. Human Development, 53, 208–228.
Mattos, E., & Chaves, A. M. (2015). Becoming professionals: Exploring young people’s constructions of alternative futures. In G. Marsico, V. Dazzani, M. Ristum, & A. C. S. Bastos (Eds.), Educational contexts and borders through cultural lens (pp. 131–156). NY: Springer.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rengifo-Herrera, F., & Branco, A. U. (2014). Values as a mediational system for self-construction: Contributions from cultural constructivism. Psicologia desde el Caribe, 31, 304–326.
Richardson, F. C. (2011). A hermeneutic perspective on dialogical psychology. Culture & Psychology, 17(4), 462–472.
Roncancio-Moreno, M. (2015). Dinâmica das significações de si em crianças na perspectiva dialógico-cultural [Children’s self meanings’ dynamics from a cultural dialogical perspective]. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Brasília, Brazil.
Roncancio-Moreno, M. & Branco, A. U. (2015). Dialogical self development in early life: Theory and research. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 31(4), 425–434.
Roncancio-Moreno, M. & Branco, A. U. (2017). Developmental trajectories of the self in children during the transition from preschool to elementary school. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 14, 38–50.
Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20.
Sato, T., Hidaka, T., & Fukuda, M. (2009). Depicting the dynamics of living the life: The Trajectory Equifinality Model. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 217–240). New York: Springer.
Shweder, R. (2010). An anthropological perspective: The revival of cultural psychology-some premonitions and reflections. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 821–836). New York: The Guilford Press.
Shweder, R., Haidt, J., Horton, R., & Joseph, C. (2008). The cultural psychology of the emotions. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Barrett (Eds.), The cultural psychology of emotions (pp. 409–427). New York: The Guilford Press.
Tateo, L. (2016). What imagination can teach us about higher mental functions. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama manifesto (pp. 149–164). London: Springer.
Trindade, B. (2017). As significações de si das crianças abrigadas: um estudo de caso com crianças que passaram por reinserção familiar [Institutionalized children’s self-meanings: selected case studies]. Unpublished Master dissertation, University of Bahia, Brazil.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2016). The human psyche on the border of irreversible time: Forward-oriented semiosis. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 304–305.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
vanDoorn, F., & van Nijnatten, J. (2012). How about you? Building blocks for a dialogical self therapy for children. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6(1), 15–29.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagoner, B. (2016). The constructive mind: Frederic Bartlett’s psychology in reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wagoner, B. (2017). Handbook of culture and memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zittoun, T. (2009). Dynamics of life-course transitions: A methodological reflection. In Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 405–429).
Zittoun, T. (2016). Studying higher psychological functions: The example of imagination. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhari, T. Sato, & V. Danzzini (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama manifesto (pp. 129–147). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Branco, A.U., Freire, S., Roncancio-Moreno, M. (2020). Dialogical Self System Development: The Co-construction of Dynamic Self-Positionings Along Life Course. In: Lopes-de-Oliveira, M., Branco, A., Freire, S. (eds) Psychology as a Dialogical Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44772-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44772-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44771-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44772-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)