Skip to main content

The Elective Nature of Cosmetic Medicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cosmetic Patient Selection and Psychosocial Background

Abstract

The number of people who decide to undergo aesthetic surgery and minimally invasive procedures is constantly increasing proving that cosmetic medicine is a recession-proof industry. Even though people have tried to enhance their beauty since the ancient times, the breakthrough of cosmetic medicine came in the early twentieth century with the introduction of safe products and antiseptic surgical techniques. Current beauty standards are widely promoted by mass media, and they are usually associated with success in professional life and interpersonal relationships. The popularity of social media has launched a new era, as even more people tend to show off a better version of themselves using smartphone applications. Some cosmetic patients present edited photos of themselves requesting similar interventions. Physicians need to be aware of the motivational factors of modern cosmetic patients so as to identify and exclude those with unrealistic expectations who may not benefit significantly from the cosmetic procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krueger N, Luebberding S, Sattler G, Hanke CW, Alexiades-Armenakas M, Sadick N. The history of aesthetic medicine and surgery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(7):737–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon KH, Castro Y, Sitnikov L, Holm-Denoma JM. Cultural body shape ideals and eating disorder symptoms among White, Latina, and Black college women. PsycNET. Accessed 6 Sep 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASPS Statistics 2018. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2018.pdf.

  4. Crockett RJ, Pruzinsky T, Persing JA. The influence of plastic surgery “reality TV” on cosmetic surgery patient expectations and decision making. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:316–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarwer DB, Magee L, Clark V. Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and sociocultural influences. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2003;2(1):29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khoo CTK. Cosmetic surgery e where does it begin? Br J Plast Surg. 1982;35:277e80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Darwin C. The origin of species. New York: Books, Inc.; 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buss DM, Abbot M, Angleitner A. International preferences in selecting mates: a study of 37 cultures. J Cross Cultural Psychol. 1990;35:5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Symons D. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsch FM, Zalenski CM, Clark ME. Is there a double standard of aging? J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;16:771–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moller AP. Female swallow preferences for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature. 1992;357:238–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrie M, Halliday TR, Sanders C. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav. 1991;41:323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Yeo R. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol Sociobiol. 1994;15:73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston VS, Franklin M. Is the beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol Sociobiol. 1991;14:183–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:456–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh D. Female judgement of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69:1089–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosmetik SE. Ein Leitfaden für praktische Ärzte. Berlin: Springer; 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paschkis H. Kosmetik für Ärzteumgearbuverm. Wien, Alfred Hölder: Auflage; 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lorand A. Die Kosmetik des Alterns. In: Joseph M, editor. Handbuch der Kosmetik. Leipzig: von Veit & Comp; 1912. p. 105–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazur A. U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. J Sex Res. 1986;22:281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fallon A. Culture in the mirror: sociocultural determinants of body image. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body images: development, deviance and change. New York: The Guilford Press; 1990. p. 80–109.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rubinstein S, Caballero B. Is Miss America an undernourished role model? JAMA. 2000;283:1569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf N. The beauty myth. New York: William Morrow; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Parham MJ, Richardson MT, Nazerali R. Celebrity influence affecting public interest in plastic surgery procedures: Google trends analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2019;43(6):1669–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Carvalho DB, Trajano V, de La Rocque LR, Sawada AC, Juvanhol LL. Using Google trends data to study public interest in breast cancer screening in Brazil: why not a Pink February? JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2007;3(2):e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Annual Survey Statistics, 2018. https://www.aafprs.org/media/stats_polls/m_stats.html. Published January 29, 2018. Accessed 06 Mar 2018.

  27. Özgür E, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Is selfie a new cause of increasing rhinoplasties? Facial Plast Surg. 2017;33(4):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ross NA, Todd Q, Saedi N. Patient seeking behaviors and online personas. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(2):269–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sorice SC, Li AY, Gilstrap J, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):1047–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pulizzi J. What is content marketing? In: Pulizzi J, editor. Epic content marketing: how to tell a different story, breakthrough the clutter, & win more customers by marketing less. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. p. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minerva F. Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(4):230–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/13/arts/stelarc-ear-arm-art/. Accessed 10 Jul 2016.

  33. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking_Cat. Accessed 10 Jul 2016.

  34. Morgan KP. Women and the knife: cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women’s bodies. Hypatia. 1991;6:25–53. 46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milothridis, P. (2020). The Elective Nature of Cosmetic Medicine. In: Cosmetic Patient Selection and Psychosocial Background. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44725-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44725-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44724-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44725-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics