Skip to main content

Definition

Corruption is a multifaceted and evolving phenomenon that involves different types of actors, behaviors, and activities. The concept is broad and there is no consensus on a standard and exhaustive definition. The complexity of corruption cannot be dealt with unidimensional and general definitions but only with a multidisciplinary approach. This is true not only when discussing the conceptualization and definition of corruption but especially when dealing with its measurement and policing.

Nonetheless, the most widely adopted definition of corruption is the one developed by Transparency International (2013): “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.” Even if widely criticized, this definition has the advantage of being synthetic while covering a broad range of corrupt activities. It applies to public sector corruption involving public officials, civil servants, or politicians, and concerning also private actors while interacting with the public sphere. It also covers...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bussell, J. (2015). Typologies of corruption: A pragmatic approach. In S. Rose-Ackerman & P. Lagunes (Eds.), Greed, corruption, and the modern state (pp. 21–45). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, G. (2007). Causes of corruption: Towards a contextual theory of corruption. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1–2), 39–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, K., & Neset, S. (2018). The cognitive psychology of corruption. Micro-level explanations for unethical behavior. U4 Issue, 2018, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas, M., Cingolani, L., & Tóth, B. (2018). Innovations in objectively measuring corruption in public procurement. In H. K. Anheier, M. Haber, & M. A. Kayser (Eds.), Governance indicators. approaches, progress, promise (pp. 154–185). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A. (2013). Describing corruption. In A. Graycar & T. Prenzler (Eds.), Understanding and preventing corruption. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A., & Masters, A. B. (2018). Preventing malfeasance in low corruption environments: Twenty public administration responses. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(1), 170–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlatshwayo, S., Oeking, A., Ghazanchyan, M., Corvino, D., Shukla, A., & Leigh, L. Y. (2018). The measurement and macro-relevance of corruption: A big data approach. International Monetary Fund working papers, WP/18/195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jancsics, D. (2019). Corruption as resource transfer: An interdisciplinary synthesis. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurer, O. (2015). Definitions of corruption. In P. M. Heywood (Ed.), Handbook of political corruption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquette, H., Flanary, R., Rao, S., & Morris, D. (2011). Supporting anti-corruption reform in partner countries: Concepts, tools and areas for action (European tools and methods series. Concept paper N° 2). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2783/33072.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marquette, H., & Pfeiffer, C. (2015). Corruption and collective action. The Developmental Leadership Program (DLP) and U4 Research Paper 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). Anti-corruption instruments and the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Abingdon, UK: OECD Secreteriat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Corruption. A glossary of international standards in criminal law. OECD Glossaries. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/41194428.pdf

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryvkin, D., Serra, D., & Tremewan, J. (2017). I paid a bribe: An experiment on information sharing and extortionary corruption. European Economic Review, 94, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2013). Global corruption report: Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2004). United Nations convention against corruption. Vienna: UNODC. Retrieved from http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). Manual on corruption surveys. Vienna: UNODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannucci, A. (2015). Three paradigms for the analysis of corruption. Labour & Law Issues, 1(2), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). Anti-corruption policies and program: A framework for evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Heywood, P. M., & Rose, J. (2014). Close but no cigar: The measurement of corruption. Journal of Public Policy, 34, 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2018). The meaning of corruption: Testing the coherence and adequacy of corruption definitions. Public Integrity, 20, 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S., Luce, H. R., & Søreide, T. (2013). International handbook on the economics of corruption, volume two. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Mugellini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mugellini, G. (2022). Corruption. In: Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C.S., Binderkrantz, A.S. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44556-0_75

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics