Skip to main content

Referendums and Referendum Campaigns

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs

Definition

A referendum is often used a “catch-all” phrase linked to notions of democracy. Often referred to as a “plebiscite” or “initiative,” a referendum, in its basic sense, is held to order to provide opportunities for voters to directly indicate their preference on government action or in relation to a specific issue. Often, these issues are controversial and multifaceted in nature. During a referendum, which may or may not be held at the same time as a general election, voters are often given a binary choice, such as a yes/no question, that indicates their preference regarding a proposed change. The results of a referendum may be legally binding or advisory, the latter of which is largely consultative in nature and used as a mechanism to check support for an issue or proposed change. Depending on the jurisdiction, a referendum can be initiated by a citizen, by a government, or through a Parliamentary process.

Introduction

The purpose of this entry is to explain what a referendum...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aimer, P., & Miller, R. (2002). Partisanship and principle: Voters and the New Zealand electoral referendum of 1993. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 795–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D. (2017). The potential of direct democracy: A global measure (1900–2014). Social Indicators Research, 133(3), 1207–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (1993). Public attitudes on the monarchy-republic issue. Politics, 28(4), 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Do voters have a cue? Television advertisements as a source of information in citizen–initiated referendum campaigns. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 777–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiani, M., & Guerra, S. (Eds.). (2017). Euroscepticism, democracy and the media: Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christin, T., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2002). Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 759–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, C. H. (2007). Context, elites, media and public opinion in referendums: When campaigns really matter. In C. H. de Vreese (Ed.), The dynamics of referendum campaigns (pp. 1–20). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M., & Uleri, P. (1996). The referendum experience in Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government accuses big American anti-cannabis group of interfering in NZ politics. (2020, June, 30). 1 News. Retrieved from https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/government-accuses-big-american-anti-cannabis-group-interfering-in-nz-politics-v1

  • Greenberg, D. S. (1966). The scope of the initiative and referendum in California. California Law Review, 54, 1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (2010). New Zealand’s direct democracy experience: An institution found lacking? c2d Working Papers Series (34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., Lock, A., & O’Shaughnessy, N. (1999). Measuring the effect of political advertising and the case of the 1995 Irish divorce referendum. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17, 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., Thorsen, E., & Wring, D. (2016). EU referendum analysis 2016: Media, voters and the campaign. Discussion Paper. Bournemouth, UK: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, L. (2002). Referendums and elections: How do campaigns differ? Routledge ECPR Studies in European Political Science, 25, 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, L. (2007). Opinion formation and change in referendum campaigns. In C. H. de Vreese (Ed.), The dynamics of referendum campaigns (pp. 21–44). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, L. (2015). Referendums and deliberative democracy. Electoral Studies, 38, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, L. (1993). Party attitudes towards referendums in Western Europe. West European Politics, 16(3), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Minister of Justice. (2019). Provision of public information for the 2020 referendum – CAB-19-MIN-0624. Retrieved from https://www.referendum.govt.nz/materials/Provision-of-Public-Information-for-the-2020-Referendums.pdf

  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Referendum Advertising at the 2020 General Election: Impact Statement. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/ris-referendum-advertising-at-the-2020-general-election.pdf

  • Roper, J., Holtz-Bacha, C., & Mazzoleni, G. (2004). The politics of representation: Election campaigning and proportional representation. New York: Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (2004). Political campaigning in referendums: Framing the referendum issue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setälä, M., & Schiller, T. (2009). Referendums and representative democracy: Responsiveness, accountability and deliberation (Vol. 62). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suksi, M. (1993). Bringing in the people: A comparison of constitutional forms and practices of the referendums. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uleri, P. V. (1996). Italy: Referendums and initiatives from the origins to the crisis of a democratic regime. In The referendum experience in Europe (pp. 106–125). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuratich, D. (2016). The referendum campaign and the public’s constitutional understanding. In D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, & D. Wring (Eds.), EU Referendum analysis 2016: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 29). Poole, UK: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • de Vreese, C. H. (Ed.). The dynamics of referendum campaigns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, L. (2015). Referendums and deliberative democracy. Electoral Studies, 38, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (2004). Political campaigning in referendums: Framing the referendum issue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setälä, M., & Schiller, T. (2009). Referendums and representative democracy: Responsiveness, accountability and deliberation (Vol. 62). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliet Roper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Roper, J., Hurst, B., Bethune, G. (2022). Referendums and Referendum Campaigns. In: Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C.S., Binderkrantz, A.S. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44556-0_144

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics