Skip to main content

Non-probability Survey Samples

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sampling Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 5681 Accesses

Abstract

We provide an overview of the emerging topic of non-probability survey samples which has drawn increased attention in the fields of survey methodology and official statistics. We highlight some of the issues in analyzing non-probability survey samples and present some of the methodological advances that have appeared in recent years. One important message from this chapter is that probability survey samples and design-based inference, which are the main focus of most other chapters of the book, play a fundamental role in the theoretical framework for non-probability survey samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., et al. (2013). Report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1, 90–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Li, P., & Wu, C. (2020). Doubly robust inference with non-probability survey samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C. F. (2014). From multiple modes for surveys to multiple data sources for estimates. Survey Methodology, 40, 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. R., & Valliant, R. (2017). Inference for nonprobability samples. Statistical Science32, 249–264.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. K., & Haziza, D. (2014). Doubly robust inference with missing data in survey sampling. Statistica Sinica, 24, 375–394.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. K., Park, S., Chen, Y., & Wu, C. (2019). Combining non-probability and probability survey samples through mass imputation. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10694

    Google Scholar 

  • Kott, P. S. (1994). A note on handling nonresponse in sample surveys.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 693–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2006). Propensity score adjustment as a weighting scheme for volunteer panel web surveys. Journal of Official Statistics22, 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Valliant, R. (2009). Estimation for volunteer panel web surveys using propensity score adjustment and calibration adjustment. Sociological Methods&Research, 37, 319–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, D. (2007). Sampling for web surveys. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 1–26). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–590.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., & Couper, M. P. (2013). The science of web surveys (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valliant, R., & Dever, J. A. (2011). Estimating propensity adjustments for volunteer web surveys. Sociological Methods&Research, 40, 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., & Sitter, R. R. (2001a). A model-calibration approach to using complete auxiliary information from survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 185–193.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q., Small, D. S., & Bhattacharya, B. B. (2019). Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 81, 735–761.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, C., Thompson, M.E. (2020). Non-probability Survey Samples. In: Sampling Theory and Practice. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44246-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics