Skip to main content

Active and Machine Learning for Earth Observation Image Analysis with Traditional and Innovative Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Data Science

Abstract

Today we are faced with impressive progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence. This not only applies to autonomous driving for car manufacturers but also to Earth observation, where we need reliable and efficient techniques for the automated analysis and understanding of remote sensing data.

While automated classification of satellite images dates back more than 50 years, many recently published deep learning concepts aim at still more reliable and user-oriented image analysis tools. On the other hand, we should also be continuously interested in innovative data analysis approaches that have not yet reached widespread use.

We demonstrate how established applications and tools for image classification and change detection can profit from advanced information theory together with automated quality control strategies. As a typical example, we deal with the task of coastline detection in satellite images; here, rapid and correct image interpretation is of utmost importance for riskless shipping and accurate event monitoring.

If we combine current machine learning algorithms with new approaches, we can see how current deep learning concepts can still be enhanced. Here, information theory paves the way toward interesting innovative solutions.

The validation of the proposed methods will be demonstrated on two target areas: the first one is the Danube Delta, which is the second largest river delta in Europe and is the best preserved one on the continent. Since 1991, the Danube Delta has been inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List due do its biological uniqueness. The second one is Belgica Bank in the north-east of Greenland which is an area of extensive fast land-locked ice that is ideal for monitoring seasonal variations of the ice cover and icebergs.

To analyze these two areas, we selected Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images provided by Sentinel-1, a European twin satellite (Taini G et al., SENTINEL-1 satellite system architecture: design, performances and operations. IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Munich, pp 1722–1725, 2012) which has an observation rate of one image every 6 days in the case of the Danube Delta and of at least two images per day in the case of Belgica Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taini, G. et al. (2012). SENTINEL-1 satellite system architecture: Design, performances and operations. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, pp. 1722–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ExtremeEarth project. (2019). Available online: http://earthanalytics.eu/. Accessed in Apr 2019.

  3. Singha, S., Johansson, M., Hughes, N., Hvidegaard, S. M., & Skourup, H. (2018). Arctic Sea ice characterization using spaceborne fully polarimetric L-, C-, and X-band SAR with validation by airborne measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(7), 3715–3734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ECOPOTENTIAL project. (2019). Available online: http://www.ecopotential-project.eu/. Accessed in Apr 2019.

  5. Li, M., Chen, X., Li, X., Ma, B., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (2004). The similarity metric. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3250–3264.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational Bayes, arXiv:1312.6114v10 [stat.ML].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(6), 679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giancarlo, R., Restivo, A., & Sciortino, M. (2007). From first principles to the Burrows and Wheeler transform and beyond, via combinatorial optimization. Elsevier Theoretical Computer Science, 387, 236–248.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sentinel-1 ESA hub. (2019). Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinel-1. Accessed in Mar 2019.

  10. ESA Thematic Exploitation Platforms. (2019). Available online: https://tep.eo.esa.int/. Accessed in Mar 2019.

  11. Danube Delta. (2016). Available: http://romaniatourism.com/danube-delta.html. Accessed in Mar 2018.

  12. Manual of Ice (MANICE). (2019). Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/weather-manuals-documentation/manice-manual-of-ice.html. Accessed in Mar 2019.

  13. Ulaby, F. T., Long, D., & Blackwell, W. J. (2014). Microwave radar and radiometric remote sensing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumitru, C. O., Schwarz, G., & Datcu, M. (2016). Land cover semantic annotation derived from high-resolution SAR images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(6), 2215–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. EOLib project. (2018). Available: http://wiki.services.eoportal.org/tiki-index.php?page=EOLib. Accessed in Feb 2018.

  16. Dumitru, C. O., Schwarz, G., & Datcu, M. (2018). SAR image land cover datasets for classification benchmarking of temporal changes. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(5), 1571–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manjunath, B. S., & Ma, W. Y. (1996). Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(8), 837–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, J., et al. (2010). WLD: A robust local image descriptor. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(9), 1705–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Monetdb. (2019). Available: https://www.monetdb.org/. Accessed in Apr 2019.

  20. Blanchart, P., Ferecatu, M., Cui, S., & Datcu, M. (2014). Pattern retrieval in large image databases using multiscale coarse-to-fine cascaded active learning. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(4), 1127–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcés, M. F. E.. (2019). Climate and sustainable development for all | General Assembly of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/pga/73/2019/03/28/climate-and-sustainable-development-for-all/. Accessed in Apr 2019.

  22. Coca, M., Anghel, A., & Datcu, M. (2018). Normalized compression distance for SAR image change detection. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2018, Valencia, Spain, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cilibrasi, R. (2003). CompLearn. Available online: https://complearn.org. Accessed in Apr 2019.

  24. Beal, M. J. (2003). Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference. PhD dissertation, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blei, D. M., et al. (2018). Variational inference: A review for statisticians, arXiv:1601.00670v9 [stat.CO].

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kingma, D. P. (2017). Deep learning and variational inference: A new synthesis. PhD thesis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 162 pages. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/8e55e07f-e4be-458f-a929-2f9bc2d169e8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2001). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, In ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3). Available online: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1961189.1961199.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Devroye, L., Gyorfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996). A probabilistic theory of pattern recognition (Vol. 31). New York: Springer Applications of Mathematics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, arXiv:1412.6980v9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579–2605.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lundberg, S., & Su-In, L. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 4768–4777.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baghdadi, N., Pedreros, R., Lenotre, N., Dewez, T., & Paganini, M. (2007). Impact of polarization and incidence of the ASAR sensor on coastline mapping: Example of Gabon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(17), 3841–3849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nunziata, F., Buono, A., Migliaccio, M., & Benassai, G. (2016). Dual-polarimetric C- and X-band SAR data for coastline extraction. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(11), 4921–4928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baselice, F., & Ferraioli, G. (2013). Unsupervised coastal line extraction from SAR images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(6), 1350–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nunziata, F., Migliaccio, M., Li, X., & Ding, X. (2014). Coastline extraction using Dual-Polarimetric COSMO-SkyMed PingPong mode SAR data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(1), 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ao, D., Dumitru, O., Schwarz, G., & Datcu, M. (2017). Coastline detection with time series of SAR images. In Proceedings of SPIE Remote Sensing, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first scenario, the protected area of the Danube Delta, was supported by the H2020 ECOPOTENTIAL project (under grant agreement No. 641762), while the selection of the second scenario, the area of Belgica Bank, was supported by the H2020 ExtremeEarth project (under grant agreement No. 825258). We would like to thank Nick Hughes from Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway, for his supporting discussions regarding the selection of the area for the second scenario.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corneliu Octavian Dumitru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dumitru, C.O., Schwarz, G., Dax, G., Andrei, V., Ao, D., Datcu, M. (2020). Active and Machine Learning for Earth Observation Image Analysis with Traditional and Innovative Approaches. In: Arabnia, H.R., Daimi, K., Stahlbock, R., Soviany, C., Heilig, L., Brüssau, K. (eds) Principles of Data Science. Transactions on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43981-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43981-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43980-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43981-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics