Skip to main content

Classical Islamic Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Traditions in Asia

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 80))

  • 606 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is about classical Islamic law and its history from the formative period until this day in three units. The first unit is about Sunni law, divided further into paragraphs dealing with public law and political theories on the Caliphate, the history of Islamic law and jurisprudence discussed through the lens of scholarly debates among madhhabs and contemporary scholarship, the sources of law and substantive law, focusing on marriage and divorce, property and the laws of obligations, crimes of three kinds (hudūd, jināyāt, taczīr) procedural law and the law of war and peace. The second unit is about Shicī law and its difference in legal theory from the Sunni understanding concerning political authority, legal sources, methods of interpretation and jurisprudence (the usūlīs and the akhbarīs). The third unit is about Islamic law in modern times and related policies such as legal westernisation, legal traditionalism and the legal understanding of Islamism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More on this in Jany (2006: 17–32, 47–52).

  2. 2.

    Noth (1994: 32–35).

  3. 3.

    Lambton (1981: 14–15).

  4. 4.

    Lambton (1981: 17).

  5. 5.

    Lambton (1981: 18–19).

  6. 6.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 5–6), Lambton (1981: 14, 18).

  7. 7.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 17).

  8. 8.

    Duri (1986a: 435).

  9. 9.

    Duri (1986b: 438).

  10. 10.

    Duri (1986b: 438–439).

  11. 11.

    Duri (1991: 323).

  12. 12.

    Lapidus (1988: 72).

  13. 13.

    Duri (1991: 324–325).

  14. 14.

    Lapidus (1988: 72).

  15. 15.

    Duri (1991: 327).

  16. 16.

    Duri (1986b: 439).

  17. 17.

    Lewis (1991: 337–338).

  18. 18.

    Jany (2012).

  19. 19.

    Schacht (1927: 321).

  20. 20.

    Schacht (1964: 71, 209).

  21. 21.

    Schacht (1950: 224–227).

  22. 22.

    Goldziher (1927: 102).

  23. 23.

    Hallaq (1997: 2–3).

  24. 24.

    Hallaq (1997: 12).

  25. 25.

    Coulson (1964: 29–33).

  26. 26.

    Schacht (1950: 190–213).

  27. 27.

    Coulson (1964: 30–31).

  28. 28.

    Motzki (2002: 287–297).

  29. 29.

    Schacht (1970: 550).

  30. 30.

    Hallaq (2001a: 1–21).

  31. 31.

    Dutton (1998: 30).

  32. 32.

    Coulson (1964: 47).

  33. 33.

    Wheeler (1996: 32–41), Hallaq (1997: 18–20).

  34. 34.

    al-Shāficī (1961: 68–71).

  35. 35.

    Hallaq (1993: 586–605).

  36. 36.

    Melchert (1997: 137–155).

  37. 37.

    Hallaq (2001a: 19–25).

  38. 38.

    Schacht (1970: 565–566).

  39. 39.

    Meron (1969: 78–101).

  40. 40.

    Weiss (1998: 44–45).

  41. 41.

    Weiss (1992: 167).

  42. 42.

    al-Shāficī (1961: 286).

  43. 43.

    Hallaq (1997: 78).

  44. 44.

    Hallaq (1989).

  45. 45.

    Weiss (1992: 556–592) has details on analogical reasoning and its methods.

  46. 46.

    al-Misrī (1994: 510–516), Ibn Rushd (1996: 1–2). Competing proposals were expressly prohibited by Muhammad, see Mālik (1989: 209).

  47. 47.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 47–51), al-Misrī (1994: 528).

  48. 48.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 47).

  49. 49.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 56–58).

  50. 50.

    Ziadeh (1957: 509–517), al-Misrī (1994: 523–524).

  51. 51.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 3), al-Misrī (1994: 517), Mālik (1989: 209), Fyzee (2002: 91–92); Bakhtiar (1996: 396–400).

  52. 52.

    Fyzee (2002: 116–117).

  53. 53.

    al-Misrī (1994: 948–949).

  54. 54.

    The prophetic tradition is quoted by Mālik (1989: 210).

  55. 55.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 23–25), al-Misrī (1994: 533).

  56. 56.

    al-Misrī (1994: 538–542).

  57. 57.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 84–87).

  58. 58.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 79), Fyzee (2002: 163–164).

  59. 59.

    al-Misrī (1994: 475–476), Bakhtiar (1996: 290–294, 311–312), Fyzee (2002: 394–396).

  60. 60.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 411).

  61. 61.

    The modern states try to overcome this rule of the classical Islamic law considered unjust by legislation even in countries where the basis of law is Islamic law, like for instance in Pakistan (1961), see Fyzee (2002: 392–393).

  62. 62.

    Fyzee (2002: 423–426).

  63. 63.

    Fyzee (2002: 358–359).

  64. 64.

    al-Misrī (1994: 392).

  65. 65.

    Fyzee (2002: 311–317), Makdisi (1981: 44–47).

  66. 66.

    Makdisi (1981: 54–57).

  67. 67.

    Heffening (1993: 1099–1102).

  68. 68.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 527–528), al-Marghīnānī (1982: 178–182), al-Māwardī (1996: 243–244), al-Misrī (1994: 611).

  69. 69.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 535), al-Māwardī (1996: 248).

  70. 70.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 544).

  71. 71.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 548).

  72. 72.

    al-Shaybānī (1966: 195, 205, 209).

  73. 73.

    Schacht (1964: 185).

  74. 74.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 253), al-Misrī (1994: 589).

  75. 75.

    Mālik (1989, 364–365), Ibn Rushd (1996: 495–497), al-Misrī (1994: 588–589).

  76. 76.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 500), al-Misrī (1994: 590), al-Māwardī (1996: 253).

  77. 77.

    Mālik (1989: 361).

  78. 78.

    Ibn Rushd (1996: 506–514), al-Māwardī (1996: 254–256), al-Misrī 1994: 592).

  79. 79.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 258–259), Kamali (1993).

  80. 80.

    Müller (1999: 143).

  81. 81.

    Schneider (1990: 131–135).

  82. 82.

    Müller (1999: 143).

  83. 83.

    Johansen (2002: 168–177).

  84. 84.

    Johansen (1993: 34).

  85. 85.

    Müller (1999: 144–159), Rebstock (1999: 11–23), Powers (1992: 323).

  86. 86.

    Kruse (1979: 23–30), Khadduri (1966: 39).

  87. 87.

    al-Misrī (1994: 599).

  88. 88.

    al-Misrī (1994: 600–601).

  89. 89.

    Khadduri (1966: 11–14).

  90. 90.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 455, 464–465), al-Misrī (1994: 602–603).

  91. 91.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 455), al-Misrī (1994: 601–602), Mālik (1989: 175).

  92. 92.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 461–462), al-Misrī (1994: 602–603).

  93. 93.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 458–460), al-Misrī (1994: 603).

  94. 94.

    al-Shaybānī (1966: 95, 102), Ibn Rushd (1994: 460).

  95. 95.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 146).

  96. 96.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 456–458), al-Misrī (1994: 604), al-Shaybānī (1966: 91).

  97. 97.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 461), al-Misrī (1994: 603), al-Shaybānī (1966: 91).

  98. 98.

    al-Shaybānī (1966: 158; 168–173), Ibn Rushd (1994: 457).

  99. 99.

    al-Māwardī (1996: 152–153), Ibn Rushd 1994: 480).

  100. 100.

    Ibn Rushd (1994: 463), al-Misrī (1994: 605).

  101. 101.

    al-Shaybānī (1966: 154–155); Kruse (1979: 85–124).

  102. 102.

    Nasr (2007: 40–42).

  103. 103.

    Kohlberg (1983: 1–9), Kohlberg (1988: 26).

  104. 104.

    Dabashi (2011: 83–90).

  105. 105.

    For modern relevance see Sobhani (2001: 150–154).

  106. 106.

    Kohlberg (1983: 11).

  107. 107.

    Kohlberg (1983: 11).

  108. 108.

    Kohlberg (1983: 15–18), Kohlberg (1976a: 525–529, 533–534).

  109. 109.

    Gleave (2001: 27–43), Kohlberg (1987: 134–137, 151–152).

  110. 110.

    Newman (2000: 935–936), Vikor (2005: 132–135), Sadr (2003a: 51–52); Sadr (2003b: 48–53).

  111. 111.

    Mallat (1993: 31).

  112. 112.

    Keddie (1969: 47–53).

  113. 113.

    Rostoványi (1998: 175–176).

  114. 114.

    Nasr (2007: 126–127; 144–145).

  115. 115.

    Löschner (1971: 134–145; 155–192).

  116. 116.

    Löschner (1971: 92–94).

  117. 117.

    Vikor (2005: 137–138), Kohlberg (1983: 11–12), Kohlberg (1988: 38).

  118. 118.

    Kohlberg (1983: 10).

  119. 119.

    Sachedina (1988: 110–112).

  120. 120.

    Kohlberg (1976b: 82–84).

  121. 121.

    Kohlberg (1976b: 84–86).

  122. 122.

    Roy (2004: 232–254).

  123. 123.

    Ayoub (2008: 2).

  124. 124.

    Mandaville (2007: 151–168).

  125. 125.

    Ramadan (1999: 239–245).

  126. 126.

    Taqlīd enscapsulates also the possibility of the creative interpretation of law though in a complicated way, see Hallaq (2001b: 86–120).

  127. 127.

    Vogel (2000: 125).

  128. 128.

    Qutb (2000: 132–138).

  129. 129.

    al-Ghanūshī’s party, the Ennahda won the first free Tunisian elections in 2011 but lost to its secular rivals in 2014.

  130. 130.

    Davison (2000: 201–208).

  131. 131.

    Bozkurt (1998: 284–287).

  132. 132.

    Hallaq (2009: 420–425).

  133. 133.

    Karpat (1970: 533–535).

  134. 134.

    Bozkurt (1998: 294).

  135. 135.

    Talesh (1986: 101–129).

  136. 136.

    Hambly (1991: 224, 231).

  137. 137.

    Talesh (1986: 101–129).

  138. 138.

    Aoued (1996: 194–198).

  139. 139.

    Vogel (2000: 286).

  140. 140.

    Vogel (2000: 8–9, 11–13, 75–77, 117, 120).

  141. 141.

    Vogel (2000: 175, 285, 336).

  142. 142.

    Marsden (1998: 64–65, 88–101).

  143. 143.

    Rasanayagam (2009: 177, 198).

  144. 144.

    Tellenbach (2003: 2–5; 13–14).

  145. 145.

    Sobhani (2001: 183), Al-Sadr (2003a: 53), see also 5.§.

  146. 146.

    Khomeinī (1981: 31).

  147. 147.

    Arjomand (1989: 120).

  148. 148.

    Mallat (1993: 50–54, 69–78, 212).

  149. 149.

    Schirazi (1997: 71), Keddie (2006: 260), Mottahedeh (2003: 32).

  150. 150.

    Constitution of Iran: 110.§.

  151. 151.

    Amanat (2007: 120).

  152. 152.

    Constitution of Iran: 91.§.

  153. 153.

    Schirazi (1997: 105).

  154. 154.

    See the presentation of the views of these contemporary thinkers and their criticism in Hallaq (2009: 511–542).

References

Sunni Law: Sources

  • Ibn Rushd (1994) Bidāyat al-Mujtahid. The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer, vol I (trans: Nyazee I). Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushd I (1996) Bidāyat al-Mujtahid. The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer, vol II (trans: Nyazee I). Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Mālik ibn Anas (1987) Muwatta’. Beirut. Al-Muwatta of Imam Malik ibn Anas. The First Formulation of Islamic Law (Trans: Bewley AA). London, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Marghīnānī (1982) Hidāya. A Commentary on the Musulman Laws (Trans: Hamilton C) (Reprint edition), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Māwardī (1996) Al-Ahkām al-Sultāniyya w’al-Wilāyāt al-Dīniyya. The Ordinances of Government. Great Books of Islamic Civilization. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Misrī A (1994)cUmdat al-Sālik. Reliance of the traveller. A classic manual of Islamic Sacred Law. In: Arabic with facing English Text (Ford: Keller NHM). Beltsville, Maryland, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Qutb S (2000) Social Justice in Islam (Trans: Hardie JB). Revised edition by Islamic Publication International, Oneonta, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Shāficī: Risāla (1940) Al-Shāficī’s Risāla (1961) Treatise on the Foundations of Islamic Jurisprudence. Translated with an Introduction, Notes, and Appendices by Majid Khadduri. Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Shaybānī (1966) Siyar. The Islamic Law of Nations. Shaybānī’s Siyar by Majid Khadduri, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

Sunni Law: Literature

  • Amanat A (2007) From ijtihād to wilāyat-i faqīh: the evolution of the shiite legal authority to political power. In: Amanat A, Griffel F (eds) Sharica. Islamic Law in the contemporary context. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoued A (1996) Algeria: reconciling faith and modernity. In: Örücü E, Attwooll E, Coyle S (eds) Studies in legal systems: mixed and mixing, 193–209. Kluwer International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjomand SA (1989) Constitution-making in Islamic Iran: the impact of theocracy on the legal order of a nation state. In: Starr J, Collier F (eds) History and power in the study of law. New directions in Legal anthropology. Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub M (2008) The many faces of political Islam. Religion and politics in the Muslim world. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiar L (1996) Encyclopaedia of Islamic Law. A compendium of the major schools. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskurt G (1998) The reception of Western European Law in Turkey (From the Tanzimat to the Turkish Republic, 1839–1939). In: Der Islam, Band 75, Heft vol 2, pp 283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson NJ (1964) A history of Islamic Law. Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison R (2000) Tanzīmāt. In: The encyclopaedia of Islam. X. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Duri AA (1986a)cĀmil. In: The encyclopaedia of Islam I. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Duri, A. A. (1986b) Amīr. In: The Encyclopaedia of Islam I. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Duri, A. A. (1991): Dīwān. In: The Encyclopaedia of Islam II. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton Y (1998) The origins of Islamic Law. New Delhi, RoutledgeCurzon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyzee AAA (2002) Outlines of Muhammadan Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford India Paperbacks, 4th edn. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldziher I (1927) Fikh. In: The encyclopaedia of Islam, vol 2, pp 101–105. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (1984) Was the gate of Ijtihad closed? Int J Middle East Stud 16:6–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (1989) Non-analogical arguments in Sunni Juridical Qiyas. Arabica 36:286–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (1993) Was al-Shafici the master architect of Islamic Law? Int J Middle East Stud 25(4):587–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (1997) A history of Islamic legal theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (2001a) From regional to personal schools of law? Islamic Law Soc 8(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (2001b) Authority, continuity and change in Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq WB (2009) Sharīca. Theory. Practice. Transformations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambly G (1991) The Pahlavi autocracy. Rizā Shāh. In: The Cambridge history of Iran, vol 7, pp 213–293. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffening W (1993) Wakf. In: First encyclopaedia of Islam 1913–1936, vol 8. Reprint Edition. Leiden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SA (1996) Taqlīd, legal scaffolding and the scope of legal injunctions in post-formative theory: Mutlaq andcĀmm in the Jurisprudence of Shihāb al-Dīn Al-Qarāfī. Islamic Law Soc 3(2). E. J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jany J (2006) Klasszikus iszlám jog. Egy jogi kultúra természetrajza. Budapest, Gondolat

    Google Scholar 

  • Jany J (2012) Judging in the Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian legal traditions. A comparison of theory and practice. Cultural Diversity and Law Series, Ashgate, GB

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen B (1993) Legal literature and the problem of change: the case of the land rent. In: Mallat C (ed) Islam and Public Law. Arab and Islamic Law Series, London, pp 29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen B (2002) Signs as evidence: the doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya (1263–1328) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (D. 1351) on Proof. Islamic Law and Soc 9(2):168–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali M (1993) Apellate review and Judicial Independence in Islamic Law. In: Mallat C (ed) Islam and Public Law, pp 49–84. London, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpat K (1970) Modern Turkey. In: The Cambridge history of Islam 1/B. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie NR (2006) Modern Iran. Roots and results of revolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadduri M (1966) Translator’s introduction to Shaybānī’s Siyar. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse H (1979) Islamische Völkerrechtslehre. Studienverlag N. Bochum, Brockmeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambton AKS (1981) State and Government in Medieval Islam, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus IM (1988) A history of Islamic Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis B (1991) Dīwān-i Humāyūn. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol II. Brill: Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Makdisi G (1981) The rise of colleges. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat C (1993) The renewal of Islamic Law. Muhammad Baqer as-Sadr, Najaf and the Shici International. Cambridge Middle East Library 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandaville P (2007) Global political Islam. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden P (1998) The Taliban. War, religion and the new order in Afghanistan. Oxford University Press, Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchert C (1997) The formation of the Sunni Schools of Law: 9th–10th centuries C. E, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Meron Y (1969) The development of legal thought in Hanafi texts. Studia Islamica 30:73–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottahedeh RP (2003) Introduction. In: Al-Sadr MB (ed) Lessons in Islamic Jurisprudence (trans: with Introduction by Mottahedeh PR). Oneworld, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzki H (2002) The origins of Islamic Jurisprudence. Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools. Leiden, Brill

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller C (1999) Gerichtspraxis im Stadtstaat Córdoba. Zum Recht der Gesellschaft in einer mālikitisch-islamischen Rechtstradition des 5./11. Jahrhunderts. Brill, Leiden, Boston, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Noth A (1994) Die Higra. In: Geschichte der Arabischen Welt (hrsg. Haarmann), 11–57. München

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers D (1992) On judicial review in Islamic Law. Law Soc Rev 26:314–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan T (1999) To be a European Muslim. A study of Islamic sources in the European context. The Islamic Foundation, Markfield, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasanayagam A (2009) Afghanistan. A modern history. I. B. Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebstock U (1999) A Qādī’s errors. Islamic Law Soc 6(1):1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostoványi Z (1998) Az iszlám a 21. század küszöbén. Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy O (2004) Globalized Islam. The search for a New Ummah. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht J (1927) Sharīca. In: E. J. Brill’s first Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol 7, pp 320–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht J (1950) The origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht J (1964) Introduction to Islamic law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht J (1970) Law and justice. In: The Cambridge history of Islam, vol 2B, pp 539–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirazi A (1997) The Constitution of Iran. Politics and State in the Islamic Republic. I. B. Tauris, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider I (1990) Das Bild des Richters in der »Adab al-QāÃī« Literatur. Islam und Abendland, Band 4. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, New York, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Talesh NMA (1986) Modern law and Judiciary Reform in Iran—An Islamic Society. In: Chiba M (ed) Asian Indigenous Law. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp 81–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellenbach S (2003) Ehrenmorde an Frauen in der arabischen Welt. Anmerkungen zu Jordanien und anderen Ländern. Wuqūf- Beiträge zur Entiwicklung von Staat und Gesellschaft in Nordafrika. No. 13, Hamburg, pp 74–89. www.gair.de

  • Vogel FE (2000) Islamic law and legal system. Studies of Saudi Arabia. Brill, Leiden, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss BG (1992) The search for God’s Law. Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss BG (1998) The spirit of Islamic Law. The University of Georgia Press, Athens and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BM (1996) Applying the Canon in Islam. The authorization and maintenance of interpretive reasoning in Hanafi Scholarship. State University of New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziadeh F (1957) Equality in the Muslim Law of marriage. Am J Comp Law 6(4):503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Shíci Law: Sources

  • Baqir al-Sadr M (2003a) Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. According to Shi’i Law (trans: Hussain AA). Islamic College for Advanced Studies Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baqir al-Sadr M (2003b) Lessons in Islamic Jurisprudence (trans: Mottahedeh RP) Oneworld, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Khomeini (1981) Islam and revolution (trans: Algar H). Mizan Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobhani J (2001) Doctrines of Shi’i Islam. A compendium of Imami beliefs and practices (trans: Shah-Kazemi). I. B. Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

Shíci Law: Literature

  • Dabashi H (2011) Shi’ism. A religion of protest. The Belknapp Press of Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleave R (2001) Akhbārī Shīcī usūl al-fiqh and the juristic theory of Yūsuf al Bahrānī. In: Gleave R, Kermeli E (eds) Islamic Law. Theory and practice. I. B. Tauris: London, pp 24–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie NR (1969) The roots of the Ulama’s power in modern Iran. Studia Islamica 29:31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg E (1976a) From Imāmiyya to Ithnā-cashariyya. Bull Sch Oriental Afr Stud 39:521–534. Reprinted in: Kohlberg E (1991) Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīcism. Variorum, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg E (1976b) The development of the Imāmi Shīcī Doctrine of Jihād. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 126:64–86. Reprinted in: Kohlberg E (1991) Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīcism. Variorum, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg E (1983) The evolution of the Shīca. Jerusalem Q 27:109–126. Reprinted in: Kohlberg E (1991) Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīcism. Variorum, Aldershot,, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg E (1987) Aspects of Akhbāri thought in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In: Levtzion N, Voll O (ed) Eighteenth century renewal and reform in Islam. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse. Reprinted in: Kohlberg E (1991) Belief and law in Imāmī Shīcism. Variorum, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg E (1988) Imam and community in the pre-Ghayba period. In: Arjomand SA (ed) Authority and political culture in Shi’ism. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 25–53. Reprinted in: Kohlberg E (1991) Belief and Law in Imāmī Shīcism. Variorum, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Löschner H (1971) Die dogmatischen Grundlagen des šī’itischen Rechts. Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat C (1993) The renewal of Islamic Law. Muhammad Baqer as-Sadr, Najaf and the Shi’i International. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr V (2007) The Shia revival. How conflicts within Islam will shape the future. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman AJ (2000) Usūliyya. In: The encyclopaedia of Islam 2, vol X. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostoványi Z (1998) Az iszlám a 21. század küszöbén. Aula kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachedina AA (1988) The just ruler in Shi’ite Islam. The comprehensive authority of the jurist in Imamite Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikor K (2005) Between God and the Sultan. A history of Islamic Law. Hurst and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janos Jany .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jany, J. (2020). Classical Islamic Law. In: Legal Traditions in Asia. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43727-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43728-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics