Skip to main content

China’s New Silk Road Project and the Mobilities Turn: Understanding Power Through Flows

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China and the New Silk Road

Abstract

China’s New Silk Road—the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)—is in the first instance an infrastructural mega-project, but works as a powerful political act. The mobilities geography, a theoretical framework assessing not only displacements of goods, people and ideas, but also their connected meanings, offers a suitable set of tools to investigate multiple layers of BRI, both from an infrastructural and from a relational perspective. Corporeal travel and good transportation, but also the establishment of information flows among Central Eurasian countries and with other world continents, and the establishment of multi-sectoral (and possibly asymmetrical) ties among regional economies. This contribution explores the advantages of understanding the BRI mega-project using the lenses of mobilities geography, i.e. exploring its ability to redefine the constellations of political power worldwide by means of an exchange of goods, people and ideas. The ultimate goal is to enlighten uncovered aspects of BRI and to set an agenda for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barisitz, S. (2017). Focus on European economic integration—Q3/17—the new silk road, part I: A stocktaking and economic assessment. Focus on European Economic Integration, Q3, 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, J. M. F., & Flint, C. (2017). The geopolitics of China’s maritime silk road initiative. Geopolitics, 22(2), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2010). Mobilities I: Catching Up. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2012). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, A. C. (2015). Parsing mobilities in Central Eurasia: Border management and new silk roads. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(4), 376–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T., & Holloway, J. (2008). Rhythmanalysing the coach tour: The Ring of Kerry, Ireland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(4), 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evseev, A. V., Krasovskaya, T. M., Tikunov, V. S., & Tikunova, I. N. (2019). New look at territories of traditional nature use–traditional nature management lands at the coastal zone of the Ice Silk Road: A case study for the Russian Arctic. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(8), 948–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, B., McGuinness, M., & Murray, L. (Eds.). (2010). Mobile methodologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of Regional Science Association, 24, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, J. R., Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2008). Mobile methodologies: Theory, technology and practice. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1266–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, K., & Weir, D. (2005). Introduction to the special issue—Journeys along the Silk Road: Intercultural approaches to comparative business systems and practices. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20081.

  • Jensen, O. B. (2010). Negotiation in motion: Unpacking a geography of mobility. Space and Culture, 13(4), 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? the sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Inside technology. shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 151–180). Cambridge, MA [u.a.]: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Qian, H., Howard, K. W., & Wu, J. (2015). Building a new and sustainable “Silk Road economic belt”. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(10), 7267–7270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2000). These boots are made for walking…: mundane technology, the body and human-environment relations. Body & Society, 6(3–4), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobis, A. (2017). The new silk road, old concepts of globalization, and new questions. Open Cultural Studies, 1, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechlaner, H., Thees, H., Manske-Wang, W., & Scuttari, A. (2019). Local service industry and tourism development through the global trade and infrastructure project of the New Silk Road–the example of Georgia. The Service Industries Journal, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., Utoktham, C. & Duval, Y. (2017, November). Trade and trade facilitation along the Belt and Road Initiative corridors, ARTNeT (Working Paper Series, No. 172), Bangkok: ESCAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, J. (2018). China’s silk road economic belt initiative: Network and influence formation in Central Asia. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(112), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sárvári, B., & Szeidovitz, A. (2016). The political economics of the New Silk Road. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 6(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scuttari, A. (2019). Cycling and motorcycling tourism. an analysis of physical, sensory, social, and emotional features of journey experiences. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., & Hesse, M. (2010). Transport, geography and the ‘new’ mobilities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural geographies, 22(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, J., Kullman, K., & Golbuff, L. (2015). Driving the ‘Starship Enterprise’ through London: Constructing the im/moral driver-citizen through HGV safety technology. Geoforum, 64, 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities (Reprinted.). Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M. (2013). Mobilities and sustainable tourism: path-creating or path-dependent relationships? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(4), 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Scuttari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scuttari, A. (2020). China’s New Silk Road Project and the Mobilities Turn: Understanding Power Through Flows. In: Pechlaner, H., Erschbamer, G., Thees, H., Gruber, M. (eds) China and the New Silk Road. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43399-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics