Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Keratoplasty and Glaucoma

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology

  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

Factors contributing to postkeratoplasty glaucoma include the presence of preexisting glaucoma, the nature of the underlying condition precipitating corneal transplantation, disruption of aqueous outflow from the keratoplasty, and the use of corticosteroids to maintain graft clarity. Various medical, laser, and incisional surgical treatments can be used to treat glaucoma associated with keratoplasty; the impact of these interventions on graft clarity and graft survival is as important to patients as their effectiveness at lowering intraocular pressure, since keratoplasty is often performed to increase and maintain visual function. With trends toward increasing utilization of lamellar keratoplasty and the introduction of keratoprostheses, more research is needed to better understand the risk of glaucoma associated with these newer corneal surgeries and ways to effectively limit glaucomatous progression. Ultimately, continued advances in corneal transplantation techniques coupled with innovative medical and surgical options for lowering intraocular pressure will permit patients to better achieve graft clarity and maintain control of glaucoma following corneal transplantation, resulting in improved outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Status of NIH-sponsored basic and clinical research on transplantation. 2006. www3.niaid.nih.gov/about/organization/dait/PDF/feb2000_transplant.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2006.

  2. Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, Lim CY, Chuck RS. Keratoplasty in the United States: a 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2432–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Price DA, Kelley M, Price FW Jr, Price MO. Five-year graft survival of Descemet membrane endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet stripping EK and the effect of donor sex matching. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1508–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Council on Scientific Affairs. Report of the organ transplant panel. Corneal transplantation. JAMA. 1988;259(5):719–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugar A, Gal RL, Kollman C, et al. Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(3):246–54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Robin JB, Gindi JJ, Koh K, et al. An update of the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. 1979 through 1983. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(1):87–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1986.01050130097029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohamadi P, McDonnell JM, Irvine JA, McDonnell PJ, Rao N, Smith RE. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1984–1988. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107(5):550–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90506-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosheh FR, Cremona FA, Rapuano CJ, et al. Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980–2005. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28(3):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9177-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang GK, Green WR. Clinicopathologic studies of keratoplasty eyes obtained surgically. Cornea. 1985;4(4):229–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stark WJBW, Maumenee AE. Surgery of the cornea. In: Rice TA, Michels R, Stark WJ, editors. Ophthalmic surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1984. p. 129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Polack FM. Glaucoma in keratoplasty. Cornea. 1988;7(1):67–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karadag O, Kugu S, Erdogan G, Kandemir B, Eraslan Ozdil S, Dogan OK. Incidence of and risk factors for increased intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29(3):278–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181b6eb9e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schanzlin DJ, Robin JB, Gomez DS, Gindi JJ, Smith RE. Results of penetrating keratoplasty for aphakic and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(3):302–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(84)90320-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huber KK, Maier AK, Klamann MK, et al. Glaucoma in penetrating keratoplasty: risk factors, management and outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(1):105–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2065-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(7):871–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33542-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yildirim N, Gursoy H, Sahin A, Ozer A, Colak E. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, risk factors, and management. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:951294. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/951294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34(5):325–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(90)90110-h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reinhard T, Kallmann C, Cepin A, Godehardt E, Sundmacher R. The influence of glaucoma history on graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235(9):553–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00947083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamagami S, Suzuki Y, Tsuru T. Risk factors for graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74(6):584–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00740.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Orucoglu F, Blumenthal EZ, Frucht-Pery J, Solomon A. Risk factors and the incidence of ocular hypertension after penetrating Keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(7):e725. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart RM, Jones MN, Batterbury M, Tole D, Larkin DF, Kaye SB. Effect of glaucoma on corneal graft survival according to indication for penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):257–62.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson RJ. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. In: Ritch R, Shields M, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1989. p. 1337–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(5):835–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(69)94577-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wind CA, Kaufman HE. Validity of MacKay-Marg applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty in man. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;72(1):117–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(71)91599-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraolar pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(5):835–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(69)94577-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D, Reinhard T, Jordan JF. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):584–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cef11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buxton JN, Riechers RJ, Aaron SD. Corneal grafts and their effect upon the applanation Schiøtz disparity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;86(1):28–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1971.01000010030007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(5):592–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71455-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, Figueiredo FC. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2001;20(8):834–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200111000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McMillan F, Forster RK. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(6):420–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020434007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(5):642–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen NX, Horn FK, Seitz B, Cursiefen C, Küchle M. Frequency-doubling perimetry in patients following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2004;23(5):433–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000121702.74077.a3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. American Academy of Ophthalmology: Preferred practice pattern: primary open angle glaucoma (AAO) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  34. American Academy of Ophthalmology: Preferred practice pattern: angle closure glaucoma (AAO) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dada T, Aggarwal A, Vanathi M, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in opaque grafts with post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 2008;27(4):402–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816373c5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fukuda R, Usui T, Tomidokoro A, et al. Noninvasive observations of peripheral angle in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2012;31(3):259–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318226daa9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Memarzadeh F, Tang M, Li Y, Chopra V, Francis BA, Huang D. Optical coherence tomography assessment of angle anatomy changes after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):464–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chua J, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to assess secondary glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28(2):243–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318188036d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Simmons RB, Stern RA, Teekhasaenee C, Kenyon KR. Elevated intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1989;87:79–91; discussion 91–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1992;11(5):427–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199209000-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. França ET, Arcieri ES, Arcieri RS, Rocha FJ. A study of glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2002;21(3):284–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200204000-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(10):1855–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(98)91030-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sihota R, Sharma N, Panda A, Aggarwal HC, Singh R. Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma: risk factors, management and visual outcome. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1998;26(4):305–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1998.tb01334.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sandhu S, Petsoglou C, Grigg J, Veillard AS. Elevated intraocular pressure in patients undergoing penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet stripping endothelial Keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(4):390–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maier AK, Klamann MK, Torun N, et al. Intraocular pressure elevation and post-DSEK glaucoma after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(4):1191–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2203-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Olson RJ, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86(1):97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(78)90022-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Olson RJ, Kaufman HE. Prognostic factors of intraocular pressure after aphakic keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86(4):510–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(78)90298-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Küchle M, Naumann GO. Impact of increased intraocular pressure on long-term corneal endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 2002;216(1):40–4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000048295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chien AM, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, et al. Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(6):711–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73636-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sekhar GC, Vyas P, Nagarajan R, Mandal AK, Gupta S. Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1993;41(4):181–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Karesh JW, Nirankari VS. Factors associated with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96(2):160–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77783-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kirkness CM, Moshegov C. Post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 1988;2(Suppl):S19–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1988.130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92(3):372–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(81)90527-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thoft RA, Gordon JM, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma following keratoplasty. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974;78(2):Op352–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Heidemann DG, Sugar A, Meyer RF, Musch DC. Oversized donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. A randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12):1807–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120041016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED, Kanellopoulos AJ, Grossman GA. Topical cyclosporin A in the management of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1997;16(3):284–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Erdurmus M, Cohen EJ, Yildiz EH, et al. Steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation or glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus or Fuchs dystrophy. Cornea. 2009;28(7):759–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181967318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rumelt S, Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U. Preexisting and postoperative glaucoma in repeated corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2002;21(8):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200211000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McDonnell PJ, Robin JB, Schanzlin DJ, et al. Molteno implant for control of glaucoma in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(3):364–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33187-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Krontz DP, Wood TO. Corneal decompensation following acute angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19(5):334–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Price MO, Thompson RW Jr, Price FW Jr. Risk factors for various causes of failure in initial corneal grafts. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(8):1087–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.8.1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vanathi M, Sharma N, Sinha R, Tandon R, Titiyal JS, Vajpayee RB. Indications and outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in India. BMC Ophthalmol. 2005;5:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-5-26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Olson RJ. Aphakic keratoplasty. Determining donor tissue size to avoid elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(12):2274–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060570022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Olson RJ, Kaufman HE. A mathematical description of causative factors and prevention of elevated intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16(12):1085–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zimmerman TJ, Krupin T, Grodzki W, Waltman SR. The effect of suture depth on outflow facility in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(3):505–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050273018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zimmerman TJ, Waltman SR, Sachs U, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure after aphakic penetrating keratoplasty "through-and-through" suturing. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979;10(7):49–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bourne WM, Davison JA, O'Fallon WM. The effects of oversize donor buttons on postoperative intraocular pressure and corneal curvature in aphakic penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(3):242–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34809-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zimmerman T, Olson R, Waltman S, Kaufman H. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure. Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(12):2231–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060533012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Perl T, Charlton KH, Binder PS. Disparate diameter grafting. Astigmatism, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(8):774–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(81)34953-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Foulks GN, Perry HD, Dohlman CH. Oversize corneal donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(3):490–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35505-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Olson RJ. Discussion of paper by Perl, et al. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(8):780–81.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA, Armitate WJ. Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism. Corneal transplant follow-up study collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(1):41–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30734-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Marks RG. Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(3):322–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32292-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(10):1392–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Collins KS, Marks RG. Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060087029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Boisjoly HM, Tourigny R, Bazin R, et al. Risk factors of corneal graft failure. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(11):1728–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31409-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Speaker MG, Guerriero PN, Met JA, Coad CT, Berger A, Marmor M. A case-control study of risk factors for intraoperative suprachoroidal expulsive hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(2):202–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32316-9. Discussion 210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Burke S, Sugar J, Farber MD. Comparison of the effects of two viscoelastic agents, Healon and Viscoat, on postoperative intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21(12):821–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Völker-Dieben HJ, Regensburg H, Kruit PJ. A double-blind, randomized study of Healon GV compared with Healon in penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1994;13(5):414–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199409000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Yang H, Zheng D, Huang J, Huang Y, Zhang Z. The clinical study of Healon 5 in phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2001;17(3):186–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vajpayee RB, Verma K, Sinha R, Titiyal JS, Pandey RM, Sharma N. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in phacoemulsification [ISRCTN34957881]. BMC Ophthalmol. 2005;5:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-5-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Li C, Zhao GQ, Che CY, et al. Effect of corneal graft diameter on therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(6):698–703. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.06.09.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Rahman I, Carley F, Hillarby C, Brahma A, Tullo AB. Penetrating keratoplasty: indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(6):1288–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Olson RJ. Variation in corneal graft size related to trephine technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(7):1323–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020065015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Huang OS, Mehta JS, Htoon HM, Tan DT, Wong TT. Incidence and risk factors of elevated intraocular pressure following deep anterior lamellar Keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:153–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sharma RA, Bursztyn LL, Golesic E, Mather R, Tingey DP. Comparison of intraocular pressure post penetrating keratoplasty vs Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.09.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhang YM, Wu SQ, Yao YF. Long-term comparison of full-bed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating keratoconus. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(5):438–50. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1200272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Polack FM. Keratoplasty in aphakic eyes with corneal edema: results in 100 cases with 10-year follow-up. Ophthalmic Surg. 1980;11(10):701–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Rabb MF, Fine M. Penetrating keratoplasty in interstitial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;67(6):907–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(69)90085-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Cohen EJ, Kenyon KR, Dohlman CH. Iridoplasty for prevention of post-keratoplasty angle closure and glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1982;13(12):994–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Waring GO 3rd. Management of pseudophakic corneal edema with reconstruction of the anterior ocular segment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(5):709–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1987.01060050127052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kenyon KR, Starck T, Hersh PS. Penetrating keratoplasty and anterior segment reconstruction for severe ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(3):396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31961-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Chu MW, Font RL, Koch DD. Visual results and complications following posterior iris-fixated posterior chamber lenses at penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23(9):608–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wood TO, West C, Kaufman HE. Control of intraocular pressure in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(4):724–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(72)90835-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Olson RJ, Zimmerman TJ, Kaufman HE. Glaucoma report. Elevated intraocular pressure after aphakic keratoplasty: iatrogenic disease and prevention. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978;10(7):931–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Paton D. The prognosis of penetrating keratoplasty based upon corneal morphology. Ophthalmic Surg. 1976;7(3):36–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Sundmacher R. Accelerated chronic endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty in glaucoma eyes. J Glaucoma. 2001;10(6):446–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200112000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Van Meter WS, Allen RC, Waring GO 3rd, Stulting RD. Laser trabeculoplasty for glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(2):185–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130195023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Lemp MA, Pfister RR, Dohlman CH. The effect of intraocular surgery on clear corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;70(5):719–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(70)90487-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Gilvarry AM, Kirkness CM, Steele AD, Rice NS, Ficker LA. The management of post-keratoplasty glaucoma by trabeculectomy. Eye (Lond). 1989;3(Pt 6):713–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1989.110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. West CE, Wood TO, Kaufman HE. Cyclocryotherapy for glaucoma pre- or postpenetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;76(4):485–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(73)90735-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Binder PS, Abel R Jr, Kaufman HE. Cyclocryotherapy for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79(3):489–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90626-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Kirkness CM. Penetrating keratoplasty, glaucoma and silicone drainage tubing. Dev Ophthalmol. 1987;14:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Kirkness CM, Ling Y, Rice NS. The use of silicone drainage tubing to control post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 1988;2(Pt 5):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1988.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Cohen EJ, Schwartz LW, Luskind RD, et al. Neodymium: YAG laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20(10):713–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Levy NS, Bonney RC. Transscleral YAG cyclocoagulation of the ciliary body for persistently high intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1989;8(3):178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Hollander DA, Giaconi JA, Holland GN, et al. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valves. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(2):169–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.02.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang B, Li W. Comparison of pars plana with anterior chamber glaucoma drainage device implantation for glaucoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0896-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Wilson RP, Spaeth GL, Poryzees E. The place of timolol in the practice of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 1980;87(5):451–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35214-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Johnson DH, Kenyon KR, Epstein DL, Van Buskirk EM. Corneal changes during pilocarpine gel therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(1):13–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(86)90459-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Mori M, Araie M, Sakurai M, Oshika T. Effects of pilocarpine and tropicamide on blood-aqueous barrier permeability in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(2):416–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Fechtner RD, Khouri AS, Zimmerman TJ, et al. Anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(1):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00071-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Konowal A, Morrison JC, Brown SV, et al. Irreversible corneal decompensation in patients treated with topical dorzolamide. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127(4):403–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00438-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Domingo Gordo B, Urcelay Segura JL, Conejero Arroyo J, Balado Vázquez P, Rodríguez AP. Corneal descompensation in patients with endothelial compromise treated with topical dorzolamide. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2002;77(3):139–44. Descompensación corneal en pacientes con compromiso endotelial tratados con dorzolamida tópica.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Lass JH, Pavan-Langston D. Timolol therapy in secondary angle-closure glaucoma post penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(1):51–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35545-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Olson RJ, Kaufman HE, Zimmerman TJ. Effects of timolol and Daranide on elevated intraocular pressure after aphakic keratoplasty. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979;11(12):1833–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Kanellopoulos AJ, Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Comparison of topical timolol gel to oral acetazolamide in the prophylaxis of viscoelastic-induced ocular hypertension after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1997;16(1):12–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Lass JH, Khosrof SA, Laurence JK, Horwitz B, Ghosh K, Adamsons I. A double-masked, randomized, 1-year study comparing the corneal effects of dorzolamide, timolol, and betaxolol. Dorzolamide corneal effects study group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(8):1003–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.8.1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Wirtitsch MG, Findl O, Heinzl H, Drexler W. Effect of dorzolamide hydrochloride on central corneal thickness in humans with cornea guttata. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(10):1345–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.10.1345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Epstein RJ, Brown SV, Konowal A. Endothelial changes associated with topical dorzolamide do appear to be significant. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;7:1089. Author reply 1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Serle JB, Katz LJ, McLaurin E, et al. Two phase 3 clinical trials comparing the safety and efficacy of Netarsudil to Timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: rho kinase elevated IOP treatment trial 1 and 2 (ROCKET-1 and ROCKET-2). Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:116–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Price MO, Feng MT, Price FW Jr. Randomized, double-masked trial of netarsudil 0.02% ophthalmic solution for prevention of corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.050.

  123. Kahook MY, Serle JB, Mah FS, et al. Long-term safety and ocular hypotensive efficacy evaluation of Netarsudil ophthalmic solution: rho kinase elevated IOP treatment trial (ROCKET-2). Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Fernandez MM. Reticular epithelial edema in edematous corneas treated with Netarsudil. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(11):1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Chen H, McMillin JC, Frankfort BJ, Al-Mohtaseb Z. Reticular epithelial edema: an uncommon side effect of ROCK/NET inhibitor Netarsudil. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(11):e124–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Shields MB. Textbook of glaucoma, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1982. p. 2987.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Thomas JV, Gragoudas ES, Blair NP, Lapus JV. Correlation of epinephrine use and macular edema in aphakic glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(4):625–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050321005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Thomas JV, Epstein DL. Timolol and epinephrine in primary open angle glaucoma. Transient additive effect. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(1):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010093010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Parrow KA, Hong YJ, Shin DH, Shi DX, McCarty B. Is it worthwhile to add dipivefrin HCl 0.1% to topical beta 1-, beta 2-blocker therapy? Ophthalmology. 1989;96(9):1338–41; discussion 1341–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Leibowitz HM, Bartlett JD, Rich R, McQuirter H, Stewart R, Assil K. Intraocular pressure-raising potential of 1.0% rimexolone in patients responding to corticosteroids. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(8):933–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140141005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Mindel JS, Tavitian HO, Smith H Jr, Walker EC. Comparative ocular pressure elevation by medrysone, fluorometholone, and dexamethasone phosphate. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(9):1577–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040429006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Reinhard T, Mayweg S, Reis A, Sundmacher R. Topical FK506 as immunoprophylaxis after allogeneic penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty: a randomized clinical pilot study. Transpl Int. 2005;18(2):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00006.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Dhaliwal JS, Mason BF, Kaufman SC. Long-term use of topical tacrolimus (FK506) in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27(4):488–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181606086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Epstein DL, Steinert RF, Puliafito CA. Neodymium-YAG laser therapy to the anterior hyaloid in aphakic malignant (ciliovitreal block) glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(2):137–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(87)90347-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Kang JJ, Allemann N, Cortina MS, de la Cruz J, Aref AA. Argon laser iridoplasty for optic obstruction of Boston keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(8):1051–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Kandarakis A, Zimmerman T. Non-pupillary block angle-closure glaucomas and their treatment by laser. Part II: laser gonioplasty technique. Ann Ophthalmol. 1984;16(10):914.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Fu YA, Liaw ZC. Argon laser gonioplasty with trabeculoplasty for chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol. 1987;19(11):419–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Gross RL, Feldman RM, Spaeth GL, et al. Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(9):1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33027-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Nakakura S, Imamura H, Nakamura T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(4):e404–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318199d226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Huang SC, Soong HK, Brenz RM, Meyer RF, Sugar A. Problems associated with penetrating keratoplasty for corneal edema in congenital glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20(6):399–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Kushwaha DC, Pual AK. Incidence and management of glaucoma in post operative cases of penetrating keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1981;29(3):167–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Ramchandani M, Mohammed S, Mirza S, McDonnell PJ. Penetrating keratoplasty in adults with congenital glaucomas. Eye (Lond). 2004;18(7):703–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Al-Mohaimeed M, Al-Shahwan S, Al-Torbak A, Wagoner MD. Escalation of glaucoma therapy after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2281–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Insler MS, Cooper HD, Kastl PR, Caldwell DR. Penetrating keratoplasty with trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100(4):593–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(85)90688-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Figueiredo RS, Araujo SV, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Katz LJ, Wilson RP. Management of coexisting corneal disease and glaucoma by combined penetrating keratoplasty and trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996;27(11):903–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Kirkness CM, Steele AD, Ficker LA, Rice NS. Coexistent corneal disease and glaucoma managed by either drainage surgery and subsequent keratoplasty or combined drainage surgery and penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(3):146–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.76.3.146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Chowers I, Ticho U. Mitomycin-C in combined or two-stage procedure trabeculectomy followed by penetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 1999;8(3):184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. WuDunn D, Alfonso E, Palmberg PF. Combined penetrating keratoplasty and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(2):396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90081-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Ishioka M, Shimazaki J, Yamagami J, Fujishima H, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(7):714–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.7.714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Yakin M, Eksioglu U, Yalniz-Akkaya Z, et al. Outcomes of trabeculectomy and Glaucoma drainage devices for elevated intraocular pressure after penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37(6):705–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Loriaut P, Nordmann JP, Laroche L, Borderie VM. Deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in eyes with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2015;34(4):375–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Akova YA, Bulut S, Dabil H, Duman S. Late bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30(2):146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. McDermott ML, Wang J, Shin DH. Mitomycin and the human corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(4):533–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090160113030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Storr-Paulsen T, Norregaard JC, Ahmed S, Storr-Paulsen A. Corneal endothelial cell loss after mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(8):654–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181659e56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Ficker LA, Kirkness CM, Steele AD, Rice NS, Gilvarry AM. Intraocular surgery following penetrating keratoplasty: the risks and advantages. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(Pt 5):693–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1990.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Lass JH, Benetz BA, He J, et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss and morphometric changes 5 years after phacoemulsification with or without CyPass micro-stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;208:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Nazarali S, Cote SL, Gooi P. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT) in Postpenetrating Keratoplasty steroid-induced Glaucoma: a case report. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):e162–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Epstein R, Taravella M, Pantcheva MB. Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy in post penetrating keratoplasty steroid-induced ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;19:100826.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Hohberger B, Welge-Lüen UC, Lämmer R. ICE-syndrome: a case report of implantation of a microbypass Xen gel stent after DMEK transplantation. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(2):e103–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):789–803.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(10):1512–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31772-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Choi J, Lee P, McDonnell PJ, et al. Longer term follow up of single plate Molteno implants in eyes with penetrating keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(Suppl):367.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Beebe WE, Starita RJ, Fellman RL, Lynn JR, Gelender H. The use of Molteno implant and anterior chamber tube shunt to encircling band for the treatment of glaucoma in keratoplasty patients. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(11):1414–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32393-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Sherwood MB, Smith MF, Driebe WT Jr, Stern GA, Beneke JA, Zam ZS. Drainage tube implants in the treatment of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1993;24(3):185–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Price FW Jr, Wellemeyer M. Long-term results of Molteno implants. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26(2):130–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Smith MF, Sherwood MB, McGorray SP. Comparison of the double-plate Molteno drainage implant with the Schocket procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(9):1246–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210064026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Rapuano CJ, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, et al. Results of alloplastic tube shunt procedures before, during, or after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1995;14(1):26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Schocket SS, Nirankari VS, Lakhanpal V, Richards RD, Lerner BC. Anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma and other refractory glaucomas. A long-term study. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(4):553–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34009-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Omi CA, De Almeida GV, Cohen R, Mandia C Jr, Kwitko S. Modified Schocket implant for refractory glaucoma. Experience of 55 cases. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(2):211–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32315-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Lieberman RA, Maris PJ Jr, Monroe HM, et al. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control in coexisting penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana Ahmed Glaucoma valves. Cornea. 2012;31(4):350–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823cbd29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Almousa R, Nanavaty MA, Daya SM, Lake DB. Intraocular pressure control and corneal graft survival after implantation of Ahmed valve device in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32(8):1099–104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31828d2a17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Knape RM, Szymarek TN, Tuli SS, Driebe WT, Sherwood MB, Smith MF. Five-year outcomes of eyes with glaucoma drainage device and penetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(9):608–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821db3e5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Witmer MT, Tiedeman JS, Olsakovsky LA, Conaway MR, Prum BE. Long-term intraocular pressure control and corneal graft survival in eyes with a pars plana Baerveldt implant and corneal transplant. J Glaucoma. 2010;19(2):124–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181a98cc1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Ritterband DC, Shapiro D, Trubnik V, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty with pars plana glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea. 2007;26(9):1060–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181342835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Hodkin MJ, Goldblatt WS, Burgoyne CF, Ball SF, Insler MS. Early clinical experience with the Baerveldt implant in complicated glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73756-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Coleman AL, Mondino BJ, Wilson MR, Casey R. Clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma valve implant in eyes with prior or concurrent penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70992-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Al-Torbak AA. Outcome of combined Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and penetrating keratoplasty in refractory congenital glaucoma with corneal opacity. Cornea. 2004;23(6):554–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000122704.49054.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Arroyave CP, Scott IU, Fantes FE, Feuer WJ, Murray TG. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage device implantation. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):1978–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00803-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Parihar JK, Jain VK, Kaushik J, Mishra A. Pars Plana-modified versus conventional Ahmed Glaucoma valve in patients undergoing penetrating Keratoplasty: a prospective comparative randomized study. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42(3):436–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2016.1185130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Sidoti PA, Mosny AY, Ritterband DC, Seedor JA. Pars plana tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with coexisting glaucoma and corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(6):1050–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00583-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Johnston RH, Nguyen R, Jongsareejit A, Lee BR, Patel S, Chong LP. Clinical study of combined penetrating keratoplasty, pars plana vitrectomy with temporary keratoprosthesis, and pars plana seton implant. Retina. 1999;19(2):116–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-199902000-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Kwon YH, Taylor JM, Hong S, et al. Long-term results of eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage tube implant. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):272–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00496-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Campbell DG, Vela A. Modern goniosynechialysis for the treatment of synechial angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(9):1052–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34195-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Shingleton BJ, Chang MA, Bellows AR, Thomas JV. Surgical goniosynechialysis for angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(5):551–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32542-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Wheatcroft S, Singh A, Casey T, McAllister J. Treatment of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty with transscleral YAG cyclophotocoagulation. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16(4–5):397–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00917999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Threlkeld AB, Shields MB. Noncontact transscleral Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(5):569–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72203-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Ocakoglu O, Arslan OS, Kayiran A. Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of refractory glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30(7):569–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680590968529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Shah P, Lee GA, Kirwan JK, et al. Cyclodiode photocoagulation for refractory glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):1986–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00767-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Beiran I, Rootman DS, Trope GE, Buys YM. Long-term results of transscleral Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma postpenetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2000;9(3):268–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200006000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Tabibian D, Wride N, Birch M, Figueiredo FC. Contact transscleral cyclodiode laser treatment for refractory glaucoma after penetrating Keratoplasty: retrospective long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(5):440–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Subramaniam K, Price MO, Feng MT, Price FW Jr. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in Keratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2019;38(5):542–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Allingham RR, et al. Contact transscleral continuous wave neodymium:YAG laser cyclophotocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(5):571–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32550-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Haller JA. Transvitreal endocyclophotocoagulation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:589–676.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Hollander DA, Lin SC. Delayed therapeutic success with endoscopic cyclophoto-coagulation in treating refractory post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;6:792–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Huang T, Wang YJ, Chen JQ, Yu MB, Jin CJ, Wang T. Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on survival of corneal grafts. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007;43(4):313–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Ayyala RS, Pieroth L, Vinals AF, et al. Comparison of mitomycin C trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage device implantation, and laser neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of intractable glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(8):1550–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(98)98046-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Elhofi A, Helaly HA. Graft survival after penetrating Keratoplasty in cases of trabeculectomy versus Ahmed valve implant. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:9034964. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9034964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  198. Zalloum JN, Ahuja RM, Shin D, Weiss JS. Assessment of corneal decompensation in eyes having undergone Molteno shunt procedures compared to eyes having undergone trabeculectomy. CLAO J. 1999;25(1):57–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Akdemir MO, Acar BT, Kokturk F, Acar S. Clinical outcomes of trabeculectomy vs. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in patients with penetrating keratoplasty: (Trabeculectomy vs. Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with penetrating keratoplasty). Int Ophthalmol. 2016;36(4):541–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0160-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Borderie VM, Sandali O, Bullet J, Gaujoux T, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet's membrane. Cornea. 2002;21(4):374–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200205000-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, Tsubota K. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):159–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01523-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Musa FU, Patil S, Rafiq O, Galloway P, Ball J, Morrell A. Long-term risk of intraocular pressure elevation and glaucoma escalation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(8):780–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02796.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Awan MA, Roberts F, Hegarty B, Ramaesh K. The outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in herpes simplex virus-related corneal scarring, complications and graft survival. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(10):1300–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.169300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Tan DT, Anshu A, Parthasarathy A, Htoon HM. Visual acuity outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case-control study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(10):1295–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.167528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, Htoon HM, Tan DT. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):744–751.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Gadhvi KA, Romano V, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Aiello F, Day AC, Allan BD. Deep anterior lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: multisurgeon results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;201:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17(6):618–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199811000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea. 2001;20(3):239–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200104000-00001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: early complications and their management. Cornea. 2006;25(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000164781.33538.b6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg. 2005;21(4):339–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea. 2004;23(3):286–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200404000-00011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Gao W, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1644–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Allen MB, Lieu P, Mootha VV, et al. Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(4):223–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181e6ae30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Nieuwendaal CP, van der Meulen IJ, Lapid-Gortzak R, Mourits MP. Intraocular pressure after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(2):147–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9665-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Ozeki N, Yuki K, Shiba D, Shimmura S, Murat D, Tsubota K. Intraocular pressure elevation after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56(4):307–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0149-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Moisseiev E, Varssano D, Rosenfeld E, Rachmiel R. Intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(3):179–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Chan EW, Wong TT, Htoon HM, Ho CL, Tan DT, Mehta JS. De novo ocular hypertension after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: comparative 3-year incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1829–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s50584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  219. Naveiras M, Dirisamer M, Parker J, et al. Causes of glaucoma after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):958–966.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. Röck D, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck T, Yoeruek E. Air bubble-induced high intraocular pressure after Descemet membrane endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35(8):1035–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Maier AK, Gundlach E, Gonnermann J, et al. Anterior segment analysis and intraocular pressure elevation after penetrating keratoplasty and posterior lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Res. 2015;53(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Lee JS, Desai NR, Schmidt GW, et al. Secondary angle closure caused by air migrating behind the pupil in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28(6):652–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318191b883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. Unterlauft JD, Elsaesser K, Grehn F, Geerling G. Intraocular pressure and trabecular meshwork outflow facility after Descemet stripping endothelial Keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(3):263–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):780–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. Ohana O, Varssano D, Shemesh G. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(7):579–83. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_31_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  226. Yi K, Bae G, Kong M, Chung ES. Intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann, noncontact, Schiøtz, and dynamic contour tonometry after DSEK. Cornea. 2013;32(8):1089–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182883e7a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Boey PY, Mehta JS, Ho CL, Tan DT, Wong TT. Outcomes of trabeculectomy after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison with penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(6):1091–8.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. Kang JJ, Rittterband DC, Lai K, Eisenberg RE, Liebmann JM, Seedor JA. Outcomes of Descemet stripping endothelial Keratoplasty in eyes with pars Plana versus anterior chamber Glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1364–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1818–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Price MO, Price FW Jr, Kruse FE, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T. Randomized comparison of topical prednisolone acetate 1% versus fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014;33(9):880–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. Quilendrino R. Rodriguez-Calvo de Mora M, Baydoun L, et al. prevention and management of Descemet membrane endothelial Keratoplasty complications. Cornea. 2017;36(9):1089–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. Maier AK, Wolf T, Gundlach E, et al. Intraocular pressure elevation and post-DMEK glaucoma following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(12):1947–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2757-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Stanzel TP, Ersoy L, Sansanayudh W, et al. Immediate postoperative intraocular pressure changes after anterior chamber air fill in Descemet membrane endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35(1):14–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):222–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW Jr. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2361–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2368–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, Yu F. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):640–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Crnej A, Paschalis EI, Salvador-Culla B, et al. Glaucoma progression and role of glaucoma surgery in patients with Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2014;33(4):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. Bradley JC, Hernandez EG, Schwab IR, Mannis MJ. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the University of California Davis experience. Cornea. 2009;28(3):321–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31818b8bfa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. Chew HF, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, et al. Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications. Cornea. 2009;28(9):989–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a186dc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. Kamyar R, Weizer JS, de Paula FH, et al. Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2012;31(2):134–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820f7a32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  242. Netland PA, Terada H, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(4):751–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(98)94034-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  243. Patel AP, Wu EI, Ritterband DC, Seedor JA. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the New York eye and ear experience. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(3):418–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  244. Talajic JC, Agoumi Y, Gagné S, Moussally K, Harissi-Dagher M. Prevalence, progression, and impact of glaucoma on vision after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(2):267–274.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  245. Aldave AJ, Sangwan VS, Basu S, et al. International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(8):1530–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Robert MC, Pomerleau V, Harissi-Dagher M. Complications associated with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and glaucoma drainage devices. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(5):573–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  247. Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(10):1779.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  248. Kang JJ, Allemann N, Cruz Jde L, Cortina MS. Serial analysis of anterior chamber depth and angle status using anterior segment optical coherence tomography after Boston Keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2013;32(10):1369–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0cff5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Panarelli JF, Ko A, Sidoti PA, Garcia JP, Banitt MR. Angle closure after Boston keratoprosthesis. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(9):725–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318259b2fc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  250. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(12):1572–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.075580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  251. Qian CX, Hassanaly S, Harissi-Dagher M. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the long-term follow-up and detection of glaucoma in Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(2):317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  252. Birnbach CD, Leen MM. Digital palpation of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(9):754–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Rubinfeld RS, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR, Arentsen JJ, Lugo M, Genvert GI. The accuracy of finger tension for estimating intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(3):213–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Kuo DS, Ou Y, Jeng BH, et al. Correlation of serial scleral and corneal Pneumatonometry. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1771–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  255. Kapamajian MA, de la Cruz J, Hallak JA, Vajaranant TS. Correlation between corneal and scleral pneumatonometry: an alternative method for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):902–906.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  256. Ali MH, Dikopf MS, Finder AG, et al. Assessment of glaucomatous damage after Boston Keratoprosthesis implantation based on digital Planimetric quantification of visual fields and optic nerve head imaging. Cornea. 2018;37(5):602–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  257. Enders P, Hall J, Bornhauser M, et al. Telemetric intraocular pressure monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis surgery using the Eyemate-IO sensor: dynamics in the first year. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;206:256–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  258. Risma JM, Tehrani S, Wang K, Fingert JH, Alward WL, Kwon YH. The utility of Diaton tonometer measurements in patients with ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and glaucoma tube shunts: a preliminary study for its potential use in Keratoprosthesis patients. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(8):643–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  259. Khoueir Z, Jassim F, Braaf B, et al. Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging for Glaucoma associated with Boston Keratoprosthesis type I and II. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(8):718–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  260. Nascimento ESR, Taniguchi EV, Cruzat A, et al. Angle anatomy and Glaucoma in patients with Boston Keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2020;39(6):713–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  261. Garcia JP Jr, de la Cruz J, Rosen RB, Buxton DF. Imaging implanted keratoprostheses with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Cornea. 2008;27(2):180–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318159bc7d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Lenis TL, Chiu SY, Law SK, Yu F, Aldave AJ. Safety of concurrent Boston type I Keratoprosthesis and glaucoma drainage device implantation. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(1):12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  263. Huh ES, Aref AA, Vajaranant TS, de la Cruz J, Chau FY, Cortina MS. Outcomes of pars plana glaucoma drainage implant in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(1):e39–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e55f8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  264. Patel V, Moster MR, Kishfy L, et al. Sequential versus concomitant surgery of glaucoma drainage implant and Boston keratoprosthesis type 1. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(6):556–63. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  265. Li JY, Greiner MA, Brandt JD, Lim MC, Mannis MJ. Long-term complications associated with glaucoma drainage devices and Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(2):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  266. Jabbour S, Lesk MR, Harissi-Dagher M. Patch graft using collagen matrix (Ologen) for glaucoma drainage device exposure in a patient with Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018:32–5.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Rivier D, Paula JS, Kim E, Dohlman CH, Grosskreutz CL. Glaucoma and keratoprosthesis surgery: role of adjunctive cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(4):321–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181815485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  268. Jabbour S, Harissi-Dagher M, Agoumi Y, Singh H, Robert MC. Cyclophotocoagulation in the control of glaucoma in patients with the Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1. Cornea. 2020;39(2):181–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Akpek EK, Harissi-Dagher M, Petrarca R, et al. Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis in aniridia: a retrospective multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(2):227–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.04.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Tan DT, Tay AB, Theng JT, et al. Keratoprosthesis surgery for end-stage corneal blindness in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):503–510.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  271. Riau AK, Venkatraman SS, Dohlman CH, Mehta JS. Surface modifications of the PMMA optic of a Keratoprosthesis to improve biointegration. Cornea. 2017;36(Suppl 1):S15–s25. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Aldave AJ, Rudd JC, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR. The role of glaucoma therapy in the need for repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2000;19(6):772–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200011000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  273. Weisbrod DJ, Sit M, Naor J, Slomovic AR. Outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty and risk factors for graft failure. Cornea. 2003;22(5):429–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200307000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  274. Baudouin C, Pisella PJ, Fillacier K, et al. Ocular surface inflammatory changes induced by topical antiglaucoma drugs: human and animal studies. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(3):556–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90116-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Baudouin C. Side effects of antiglaucomatous drugs on the ocular surface. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996;7(2):80–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-199604000-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Fu Y, Liu J, Tseng SC. Ocular surface deficits contributing to persistent epithelial defect after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012;31(7):723–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821142ee.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  277. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Johns S, Gonzales JS. Risk factors for corneal graft failure. J Refract Surg. 1996;12(1):134–43; discussion 143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  278. Pastor SA, Williams R, Hetherington J, Hoskins HD, Goodman D. Corneal endothelial cell loss following trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. J Glaucoma. 1993;2(2):112–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  279. Sorkin N, Mimouni M, Kisilevsky E, et al. Four-year survival of Descemet membrane endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with prior Glaucoma surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.05.020.

  280. McDermott ML, Swendris RP, Shin DH, Juzych MS, Cowden JW. Corneal endothelial cell counts after Molteno implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(1):93–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73530-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  281. Waring GO 3rd, Welch SN, Cavanagh HD, Wilson LA. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in 123 eyes with pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34606-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  282. Jensen OM, Haamann P, Schmidt P. Penetrating keratoplasty and transscleral fixation of posterior chamber lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995;73(6):551–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1995.tb00336.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Kandarakis AS, Doulas KG, Amariotakis AG. Penetrating keratoplasty and transsclerally suture-fixated intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 1996;12(2):S304–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  284. Lois N, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR. Long-term graft survival in patients with flexible open-loop anterior-chamber intraocular lenses. Cornea. 1997;16(4):387–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  285. Robinson CH. Indications, complications and programs for repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979;10:27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Feldman ST, Frucht-Pery J, Brown SI. Corneal transplantation in microphthalmic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104(2):164–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(87)90009-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Heidemann DG, Dunn SP. Transsclerally sutured intraocular lenses in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113(6):619–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74784-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  288. Kenyon KR, Kenyon BM, Starck T, Hersh PS. Penetrating keratoplasty and anterior segment reconstruction for severe ocular trauma. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1994;3(2):90–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  289. Doren GS, Cohen EJ, Brady SE, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Penetrating keratoplasty after ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;110(4):408–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77022-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Kremer I, Rajpal RK, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(3):317–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73581-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Ficker LA, Kirkness C, Wright P. Prognosis for keratoplasty in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(1):105–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31707-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  292. Gollamudi SR, Traboulsi EI, Chamon W, Stark WJ, Maumenee IH. Visual outcome after surgery for Peters’ anomaly. Ophthalmic Genet. 1994;15(1):31–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816819409056908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  293. al-Rajhi AA, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):956–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30200-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  294. Sajjadi H, Javadi MA, Hemmati R, Mirdeghan A, Parvin M, Nassiri N. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in CHED. Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 1995;14(1):18–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  295. Mullaney PB, Risco JM, Teichmann K, Millar L. Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy associated with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(2):186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31037-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  296. Crawford GJ, Stulting RD, Cavanagh HD, Waring GO 3rd. Penetrating keratoplasty in the management of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Cornea. 1989;8(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Chang PC, Soong HK, Couto MF, Meyer RF, Sugar A. Prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9(2):129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Alvim PT, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Cornea. 2001;20(2):134–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200103000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  299. Siegner SW, Netland PA, Urban RC Jr, et al. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(9):1298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30871-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Heuer DK, Minckler DS, Martone JF. Initial clinical experience with the Baerveldt implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(4):640–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31283-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  301. Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Fellenbaum PS, et al. Intermediate-term results of a randomized clinical trial of the 350- versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(8):1456–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31152-3; discussion 1463–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  302. Alvarenga LS, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD, Lee WB, Schwab IR, Lim MC. The long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):200–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  303. Sihota R, Srinivasan G, Gupta V. Ab-externo cyclodialysis enhanced trabeculectomy for intractable post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2010;24(6):976–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Annie M. Wu, Joshua D. Stein & Paul P. Lee

  2. Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Peter J. McDonnell

Authors
  1. Annie M. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua D. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter J. McDonnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul P. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua D. Stein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science, Portland, OR, USA

    Daniel M. Albert

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Joan W. Miller

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Dimitri T. Azar

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Lucy H. Young

Section Editor information

  1. New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, USA

    James C. Tsai

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Yang Sun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wu, A.M., Stein, J.D., McDonnell, P.J., Lee, P.P. (2022). Keratoplasty and Glaucoma. In: Albert, D.M., Miller, J.W., Azar, D.T., Young, L.H. (eds) Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42634-7_175

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42634-7_175

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42633-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42634-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation