Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Italy Towards Mandatory Sustainability Reporting. Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Italian Companies and Legislative Decree 254/2016 Statements. A Quantitative Analysis of the Last 10 Years

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Law

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) is crucial in providing transparent and reliable information. Company characteristics play a key role in CSRD, but legislation is important and positive in increasing the number of companies, which make complete and transparent sustainability disclosure and stimulating CSR initiatives. In 2016, for the first time, Italian Legislative Decree 254/2016 requires ‘public interest entities’, to integrate statutory financial statements with disclosure of environmental, social and governance strategies from financial year 2017 onwards. This chapter investigates the role of company characteristics in influencing voluntary disclosure. The analysis focused on voluntary CSRD (2007–2016) implemented by Italian listed companies in the 10-year period, and shows that in a non-mandatory context the number of CSR reports published grew steadily. It reveals the voluntary behavior of Italian companies, compliance with the requirements of the Decree with reference to the different dimensions of sustainability, and to the use of international standards and guidelines. Findings show also a marked increase of the number of companies, which, in 2017, produced a non-financial report after the entry into force of the new law. The strength of this work is that it investigates what happened in the decade preceding the introduction of the new law tracing the relationship between historical situation, business characteristics and the requirements of the legislative decree. These results and the immediate impact of the new regulation are interestingly linked to the relationship between law and sustainable development and will be directly and indirectly useful for scholars, managers and national and international regulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://integratedreporting.org/

  2. 2.

    https://www.globalreporting.org/

  3. 3.

    http://www.gruppobilanciosociale.org/

References

  • Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting. Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tuwaijiri, S., Christensen, T., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti, L. (2018). Web-based integrated CSR reporting: An empirical analysis. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy & the Environment, 17(2), 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7/8), 1168–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspect so flaw and CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buniamin, S. (2010). The quantity and quality of environmental reporting in annual report of public listed companies in Malaysia. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 4(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2004). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies. A research note. British Accounting Review, 36, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, G. K., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 27, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2014). CSR report assurance in the USA: An empirical investigation of determinants and effects. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(2), 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T. (2002). Corporate communication: The challenge of transparency. Corporate Communications, 7(3), 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality: Do firms respond to economic incentives, public pressures, or institutional conditions. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, S. S., Ferreti, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The Impact of corporate characteristics on responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., Venter, E. R., & Hsiao, P. C. K. (2016). Integrated reporting: Background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective. A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sánchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28, 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting & Business Research, 19(76), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G. S. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, P., & Zunker, T. (2013). Attaining legitimacy by employee information in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1072–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Walhain, S., & van der Wateringen, S. (2001). Environmental reporting by the fortune global 250: Exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L., & Unerman, J. (1999). Ethical relativism: A reason for differences in corporate social reporting? Critical Perspective on Accounting, 10, 521–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signalling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4/5), 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marimon, F., del Mar, A.-A. M., del Pilar, R. M., & Alejandro, K. A. C. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: What is the point? Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 481–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16, 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mio, C., Fasan, M., & Pauluzzo, R. (2016). Internal application of IR principles: Generali’s internal integrated reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30, 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (2011). Twenty-one years of social and environmental accountability research: A coming of age. Accounting Forum, 35(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, N. A. (2016). The extent of online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure: The Malaysian context. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 2(5), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 16(6), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R., & Millington, A. (2014). Corporate social disclosures: A user perspective on assurance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 863–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorio, A., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Sierra, L. (2013). Sustainability development and the quality of assurance reports: Empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 484–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

    Federica Balluchi, Katia Furlotti & Riccardo Torelli

Authors
  1. Federica Balluchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katia Furlotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Riccardo Torelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Balluchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden

    Volker Mauerhofer

  2. Department of Economics, University of Messina (Italy), Messina, Italy

    Daniela Rupo

  3. Department of Economic Studies, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy

    Lara Tarquinio

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balluchi, F., Furlotti, K., Torelli, R. (2020). Italy Towards Mandatory Sustainability Reporting. Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Italian Companies and Legislative Decree 254/2016 Statements. A Quantitative Analysis of the Last 10 Years. In: Mauerhofer, V., Rupo, D., Tarquinio, L. (eds) Sustainability and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42629-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42630-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation