Abstract
This chapter takes issue with C.E. Baker’s stance that the Free Speech Principle should protect even the most harmful and vile expression because such protection would promote individual self-government, enhance personal autonomy, and promote critical thinking. It is argued that a balance needs to be struck between these goods and the impact of the speech in question on its target group. The protection of free speech cannot be offered in isolation from its wider consequences, not only those that affect the speaker but also those that affect those whom the speaker intended to influence. Furthermore, the content of the speech should be evaluated on its face value. Incitement and grave offenses, morally on a par with physical harm, should be excluded from the Free Speech Principle.
Gratitude is expressed to Tim Scanlon, Wayne Sumner, Bhikhu Parekh, Steve Newman, and Eric Heinze for their most constructive comments on earlier drafts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams F (2017) The Soul of the first amendment. New Haven: Yale University Press
Alford JR (2001) We’re all in this together. The decline of trust in government, 1958–1996. In: Hibbing JR, Theiss-Morse E (eds) What is it about government that Americans dislike? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Article 19 (2018) Responding to ‘hate speech’: comparative overview of six EU countries. Article 19, London. https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ECA-hate-speech-compilation-report_March-2018.pdf
Associated Press (2017) Neo-Nazi site’s publisher says he’s got no home on Internet. NY Times (August 16). https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/08/16/us/ap-us-neo-nazi-website-sued.html
Baker CE (1978) Scope of the first amendment freedom of speech. UCLA Law Rev 25:964–1040
Baker CE (1980) Press rights and government power to structure the Press. U Miami Law Rev 34:819–889
Baker CE (1989) Human liberty and freedom of speech. Oxford University Press, New York
Baker CE (1996) First amendment and the Internet: will free speech principles applied to the media apply here? J Civil Rights Econ Dev 11(3):Article 17
Baker CE (1997) Harm, liberty and free speech. South Calif Law Rev 70:979–1020
Baker CE (2008) Hate speech. University of Pennsylvania Law School, Faculty Scholarship, Paper 198:1–23
Baker CE (2009) Autonomy and hate speech. In: Hare I, Weinstein J (eds) Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 139–157
Baker CE (2012) Chap 3 Hate speech. In: Herz M, Molnar P (eds) The content and context of hate speech. Cambridge University Press, New York
Barak A (2000) Freedom of expression and its limitations. In: Cohen-Almagor R (ed) Challenges to democracy: essays in honour and memory of Isaiah Berlin. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, pp 167–188
Barker P (ed) (1999) Living as equals. Oxford University Press, New York
Beirich H (2014) Frazier Glenn Miller, Longtime Anti-Semite, Arrested in Kansas Jewish Community center murders. splcenter.org (April 13)
Bleich E (2011a) The rise of hate speech and hate crime laws in liberal democracies. J Ethn Migr Stud 37(6):917–934
Bleich E (2011b) The freedom to be racist? Oxford University Press, New York
Bollinger LC (1986) The tolerant society. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bollinger LC (2010) Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-open: a free press for a new century. Oxford University Press, New York
Bollinger LC, Stone GR (eds) (2002) Eternally vigilant: free speech in the modern era. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Cardozo BN (2012) The paradoxes of legal science. Columbia University Press, New York, p 1956
Cohen M, Nagel T, Scanlon T (eds) (1977) Equality and preferential treatment. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cohen-Almagor R (1994) The boundaries of liberty and tolerance. The University Press of Florida, Gainesville
Cohen-Almagor R (2005) Speech, media, and ethics: the limits of free expression. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills/New York
Cohen-Almagor R (2006) The scope of tolerance: studies on the costs of free expression and freedom of the Press. Routledge, London/New York
Cohen-Almagor R (2012) Between autonomy and state regulation: J.S. Mill’s elastic paternalism. Philosophy 87(4):557–582
Cohen-Almagor R (2012a) Content net neutrality – a critique. In: Demir H (ed) Luciano Floridi’s philosophy of technology: critical reflections. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 151–167
Cohen-Almagor R (2013) Freedom of expression v. social responsibility: holocaust denial in Canada. J Mass Media Ethics 28(1):42–56
Cohen-Almagor R (2015) Confronting the Internet’s dark side: moral and social responsibility on the free highway. Cambridge University Press and Woodrow Wilson Center Press, New York/Washington, DC
Cohen-Almagor R (2016) Hate and racist speech in the United States – a critique. Philos Public Iss 6(1):77–123. http://fqp.luiss.it/2016/11/29/hate-and-racist-speech-in-the-united-states-a-critique/
Cohen-Almagor R (2017) JS Mill’s boundaries of freedom of expression: a critique. Philosophy 92:565–596
Cohen-Almagor R (2019) Racism and hate speech – a critique of Scanlon’s contractual theory. First Amendment Stud 53:41–66
Cohen-Almagor R, Haleva-Amir S (2008) Bloody Wednesday in Dawson College – the story of Kimveer Gill, or why should we monitor certain websites to prevent murder. Stud Ethics Law Technol 2(3):Article 1. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/raphael_cohen_almagor/1
Cohen-Almagor R, Wattad MS (2018) The legal status of Israeli-Arabs/Palestinians. GNLU Law Soc Rev 1:1–28
Collin v. Smith, 578 F.2d 1197 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 915 (1978)
Croft J, Ahmed S (2018) The Pittsburgh synagogue shooting is believed to be the deadliest attack on Jews in American history, the ADL says. CNN (October 28). https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/27/us/jewish-hate-crimes-fbi/index.html
Dearden L (2018) Gab: inside the social network where alleged Pittsburgh synagogue shooter posted final message. The Independent (October 28). https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pittsburgh-synagogue-shooter-gab-robert-bowers-final-posts-online-comments-a8605721.html
Dickson C (2014) Where white supremacists breed online. The Daily Beast (April 17). http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/17/where-white-supremacists-breed-online.html?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=cheatsheet_afternoon&cid=newsletter%3Bemail%3Bcheatsheet_afternoon&utm_term=Cheat%20Sheet
Dorsen N (1988) Is there a right to stop offensive speech? The case of the Nazis at Skokie. In: Gostin L (ed) Civil liberties in conflict. Routledge, London/New York, pp 122–135
Douglas, William O. Quote (2019). http://izquotes.com/quote/52709
Dworkin RM (1983) Why liberals should believe in equality. New York Rev Books (February 3)
Dworkin RM (1985) A matter of principle. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Dworkin R (1986) Introduction. In: Dworkin RM (ed) The philosophy of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 14–15
Dworkin RM (2002) Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dworkin R (2009) Foreword. in Ivan Hare and James Weinstein (eds.), Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. v–ix
Dworkin R (2011) Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA, Belknap
Emerson TI (1970) The system of freedom of expression. Random House, New York
Feinberg J (1985) Offense to others. Oxford University Press, New York
Frankfurter F (1956) Of law and men: papers and addresses of Felix Frankfurter 1939–1956. Harcourt Brace, New York
Fried A (1996) McCarthyism, the great American Red Scare. Oxford University Press, New York
Full text of “Background and Detailed Chronology of Ernst Zuendel Persecution (1996). https://www.archive.org/stream/BackgroundAndDetailedChronologyOfErnstZuendelPersecutionEN199693P./Background%20and%20Detailed%20Chronology%20of%20Ernst%20Zuendel%20Persecution%20(EN,%201996,%2093%20p.)_djvu.txt
Gey SG (2004) A few questions about cross burning, intimidation, and free speech. Florida State University College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 106
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
Hatewatch Staff (2017) Waning storm: Stormfront.org loses its domain (August 29). https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/08/29/waning-storm-stormfrontorg-loses-its-domain
Henthoff N (1992) Free speech for me – but not for thee: how the American left and right relentlessly censor each other. Harper Collins, New York
Holmes OW (1920) Collected legal papers. Harcourt Brace and Howe, New York
Jordan C, Dworkin R (2013) Reason and imagination: the selected correspondence of learned hand. Oxford University Press, New York
Kant I (1997) Critique of practical reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Keneally M (2018) Skokie: the legacy of the would-be Nazi march in a town of Holocaust survivors. ABC News (June 22). https://abcnews.go.com/US/skokie-legacy-nazi-march-town-holocaust-survivors/story?id=56026742
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (2017) Stormfront.com website shut down following successful action By National Civil Rights Organization (August 26). https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LaurenWeinstein/posts/MwpNHuFqGeK
Masucci M, Langton L (2017) Hate crime victimization, 2004–2015. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics (June). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice
Meiklejohn A (1961) The first amendment is an absolute. Supreme Court Rev 245–266
Meiklejohn A (1965) Political freedom. Oxford University Press, New York
Meiklejohn A (1966) Freedom of speech. In: Radcliff P (ed) Limits of liberty. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, pp 19–26
Meiklejohn A (2000) Free speech and its relation to self-government. Lawbook Exchange, Union
Mill JS (1948) On liberty, in utilitarianism, liberty, and representative government. J. M. Dent, London. Everyman’s edition
Mill JS (1973) Dissertations and discussions, vol I, II. Haskell House Publishers., New York
Mill JS (1975) Three essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mill JS (1976) Law and libel and liberty of the Press. In: Williams GL (ed) John Stuart Mill on politics and society. Fontana, Glasgow, pp 143–169
Neier A (1979) Defending my enemy. E.P. Dutton, New York
Newman SL (2004) American and Canadian perspectives on hate speech and the limits of free expression. In: Newman SL (ed) Constitutional politics in Canada and the United States. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 153–173
Oshinsky DM (2005) A conspiracy so immense: the world of Joe McCarthy. Oxford University Press, New York
Parekh B (2012) Is there a case for banning hate speech? In: Herz M, Molnar P (eds) The content and context of hate speech. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 37–56
Parekh B (2017) Limits of free speech. Philosophia 45(3):931–935
PewResearch (2014) Public trust in government: 1958–2014. http://www.people-press.org/2014/11/13/public-trust-in-government/
Pinto M (2010) What are offences to feelings really about? A new regulative principle for the multicultural era. Oxf J Leg Stud 30(4):695–723
Pinto M (2012) Offences to religious feelings in Israel: a theoretical explication of an exceptional legal doctrine. Ethnicities 12(2):233–248
Rabban D (1999) Free speech in its forgotten years, 1870–1920. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raz R (1986) The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Reidy P (2013) Ronald Dworkin: a new map of censorship. Xindex (February 14). http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/ronal-dworkin-free-speech-censorship/
Richards DAJ (1986) Toleration and the constitution. Oxford University Press, NY
Richards DAJ (1988) Toleration and free speech. Philos Public Aff 17(4):323–336
Scanlon TM (1977) A theory of freedom of expression. In: Dworkin RM (ed) The philosophy of law, pp 161–162. Reprinted from Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(2) (Winter 1972): 204–226
Scanlon TM (1979) Freedom of expression and categories of expression. Univ Pittsburgh Law Rev 40(3):519–550
Scanlon TM (1995) Content regulation reconsidered. In: Lichtenberg J (ed) Democracy and the mass media. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 331–339
Scanlon T (2003) The difficulty of tolerance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Scanlon TM (n/d) Moral rights and constitutional rights (unpublished paper)
Schauer F (1982) Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press
Schauer F (1985) Slippery slopes. Harvard Law Rev 99:361–383
Schauer F (2000) The cost of communicative tolerance. In: Cohen-Almagor R (ed) Liberal democracy and the limits of tolerance. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 28–42
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
Schreker EW (2001) The age of McCarthyism. St. Martin’s, Bedford
Schulberg J, Liebelson D, Craggs T (2017) The Neo-Nazis are back online. Huffington Post (October 3). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nazis-are-back-online_us_59d40719e4b06226e3f46941?m8d
Skillen A (1982) Freedom of speech. In: Graham K (ed) Contemporary political philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp 139–159
Smits K (2016) Applying political theory. Palgrave, London
Southern Poverty Law Center, “Neo-Nazi”, SPLC (2017). https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/neo-nazi
Stephens-Davidowitz S (2014) The data of hate. New York Times (July 12). http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/13/opinion/sunday/seth-stephens-davidowitz-the-data-of-hate.html
Stone GR, Bollinger LC (eds) (2018) The free speech century. Oxford University Press, New York
Tribe LH (1988) American constitutional law. Foundation Press, New York
Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America, 69 Ill. 2d 605, 373 N.E.2d 21 (1978)
Virginia v. Black, 123 S. Ct. 1536 (2003)
Volokh E (2003) The mechanisms of the slippery slope. Harv Law Rev 116:1026–1137
Waldron J (2010) Dignity and defamation: the visibility of hate. Harv Law Rev 123:1596–1657
Waldron J (2012) The harm in hate speech. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wood GS (1969) The creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2022). Tolerating Racism and Hate Speech: A Critique of C.E. Baker’s “Almost” Absolutism. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42120-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42121-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences