Skip to main content

Political Entrepreneurs and Their Parties: Conceptual and Typological Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics

Abstract

This chapter places the phenomenon of entrepreneurial parties in the wider historical perspective of the types of political party. The text offers a definition of an entrepreneurial party based on a discussion of scholarly concepts. The empirical reality shows that political entrepreneurs differ in the size and role of their businesses and their approach to party organisation. The differences are used to create a typology which combines two characteristics. The first is the business facilities of political entrepreneurs, that is, their ability and willingness to invest their own financial, media, personnel and other resources into the start-up and operation of their parties. Simply put, there are political entrepreneurs ‘with a firm’ and those ‘without a firm’. The second characteristic is concerned with whether there is any party membership and territorial structure at all. Further, the chapter outlines the topics of party durability and collapse and presents a three-phase model of the institutionalisation of entrepreneurial parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some parts of this chapter are based on our journal article: Hloušek and Kopeček (2017a).

  2. 2.

    This, of course, is not the only factor. The political opportunities structure is also crucial for entrepreneurial party success. Typically, an entrepreneurial party succeeds in a situation of major political or economic crisis, which causes an earthquake in the party system, allowing the entrepreneurial party to pick up the dissatisfied voters of the established parties. This dimension of entrepreneurial parties’ success, however, must be considered contextually on a case-by-case basis, and as such it cannot be used as one of the dimensions in an entrepreneurial party typology.

References

  • Arter, D. (2016). When New Party X Has the ‘X Factor’. On Resilient Entrepreneurial Parties. Party Politics, 22(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arter, D., & Kestilä-Kekkonen, E. (2014). Measuring the Extent of Party Institutionalisation: The Case of a Populist Entrepreneur Party. West European Politics, 37(5), 932–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardi, L., Bartolini, S., & Trechsel, A. (2014). Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics. West European Politics, 37(2), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barndt, W. T. (2014). Corporation-Based Parties: The Present and Future of Business Politics in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(2), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barndt, W. T. (2016). The Organizational Foundations of Corporation-Based Parties. In S. Levitsky, J. Loxton, B. Van Dyck, & J. Domínguez (Eds.), Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America (pp. 356–382). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, S., & Rahat, G. (2011). Out with the Old, in with the New: What Constitutes a New Party? Party Politics, 17(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolleyer, N., & Bytzek, E. (2013). Origins of Party Formation and New Party Success in Advanced Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 52(6), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, K. (2004). Parties as Franchise Systems. The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative. Party Politics, 10(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos, D. (2006). Relational Attributes of Political Entrepreneurs: A Network Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 757–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2000). The Decline of Party Identifications. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties Without Partisans (pp. 19–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan-Krause, K., & Haughton, T. (2018). Surviving the Storm: Factors Determining Party Survival in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 32(3), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detterbeck, K. (2005). Cartel Parties in Western Europe? Party Politics, 11(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiLorenzo, T. (2004). How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country. New York: Crown Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farell, D. M. (2006). Political Parties in Changing Camping Environment. In R. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 122–133). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, R., & Diamond, L. (2001). Types and Functions of Parties. In L. Diamond & R. Gunther (Eds.), Political Parties and Democracy (pp. 3–39). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, S. (2012). Dynamics of New Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996–2010. East European Politics, 28(2), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. G. (1993). Party Leadership and Party Institutionalisation: Three Phases of Development. West European Politics, 16(2), 66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hloušek, V., & Kopeček, L. (2017a). Entrepreneurial Parties: A Basic Conceptual Framework. Czech Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, J., & Paolucci, C. (1999). The Business Firm Party Model of Party Organisation. Cases from Spain and Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 307–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, P. (2014). Power and the (Il)legitimacy of Political Parties: An Unavoidable Paradox of Contemporary Democracy? Party Politics, 14(2), 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1971). The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. The American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, A. (2016). Corporate State Capture in Open Societies: The Emergence of Corporate Brokerage Party Systems. East European Politics and Societies, 30(3), 594–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefford, G., & McDonnell, D. (2018). Inside the Personal Party: Leader-Owners, Light Organizations and Limited Lifespan. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(2), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. In J. LaPalombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political Parties and Political Development (pp. 177–200). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchelt, H. (2000). Citizens, Politicians and Party Cartellization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(2), 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klíma, M. (2020). Informal Politics in Post-Communist Europe: Political Parties, Clientelism and State Capture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, R. (1996). Cadre, Catch-All or Cartel? Party Politics, 2(4), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. (2006). Party Models. In R. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 249–269). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. (2012). Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, S. L., & Art, D. (2011). Fortuyn Versus Wilders: An Agency-Based Approach to Radical Right Party Building. West European Politics, 34(6), 1229–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments (pp. 1–64). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucardie, P. (2000). Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors. Toward a Theory of the Emergence of New Parties. Party Politics, 6(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (1990). Introduction. In P. Mair (Ed.), The West European Party System (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, O., & Voerman, G. (2017). Memberless Parties: Beyond the Business-Firm Party Model? Party Politics, 23(6), 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2018). Comparison: A Methodological Introduction for the Social Sciences. Opladen, Berlin, and Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, S. (1956). Toward a Comparative Study of Political Parties. In S. Neumann & F. C. Barghoorn (Eds.), Modern Political Parties. Approaches to Comparative Politics (pp. 395–421). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, G. (2014). Italy: The Triumph of Personalist Parties. Politics and Policy, 42(4), 548–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, V., & Svåsand, L. (2002). Party Institutionalisation in New Democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. E. (2000). Parties Without Members. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties Without Partisans (pp. 37–63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. E. (2015). Beyond Party Members. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2010). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sikk, A. (2005). How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikk, A. (2012). Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties. Party Politics, 18(4), 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, M. (2006). Party System Change. Party Politics, 12(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, M. (2012). Organizing for Success: Party Organizational Strength and Electoral Performance in Postcommunist Europe. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, M. (2013). Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, Going …, Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Biezen, I., & Kopecký, P. (2007). The State and the Parties. Party Politics, 13(2), 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vercesi, M. (2015). Owner Parties and Party Institutionalisation in Italy: Is the Northern League Exceptional? Modern Italy, 20(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolinetz, S. (2002). Beyond the Catch-All Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies. In J. R. Montero, J. J. Linz, & R. Gunther (Eds.), Political Parties (pp. 136–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zons, G. (2013). The Influence of Programmatic Diversity on the Formation of New Political Parties. Party Politics, 21(6), 919–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vít Hloušek .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hloušek, V., Kopeček, L., Vodová, P. (2020). Political Entrepreneurs and Their Parties: Conceptual and Typological Issues. In: The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41916-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics