Abstract
Discontent concerning the functioning of democracy has become a global phenomenon, as many governments have not responded to the demands of society due to the monopolization of power by private economic interests and specific groups. Considering Brazil as a case study, I will attempt to demonstrate the relationship between the global crisis of democracy and the decline of biocultural diversity. Numerous situations could be presented, but perhaps the most emblematic example of that deteriorating relationship can be seen in the recent extinction, by presidential decree, of more than 700 councils, commissions, forums, and other means of dialogue between the government and the Brazilian population. Many of those communication spaces had consultative and/or deliberative characters, were related to environmental questions, and involved policies and programs designed to address social questions as well as those of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC). That measure, together with a series of additional decrees and constitutional amendments, has largely eliminated the possibility of active societal participation in biodiversity conservation and in questions related to IPLC and the administration of their territories—with disastrous consequences for both. This chapter also presents descriptions of diverse forms of resistance and opposition to that new political reality. The second part of the chapter introduces the concepts related to participative conservation of biodiversity within the context of this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abessa D, Famá A, Buruaem L (2019) The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts. Nat Ecol Evol 3:510–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9
Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15188–15193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702098104
Carmo S, Neves R (2019) TCU vai apurar possível “ineficiência” da gestão de Salles no Meio Ambiente. Available via Congresso em Foco. https://congressoemfoco.uol.com.br/meio-ambiente/tcu-vai-apurar-possivel-ineficiencia-da-gestao-de-salles-no-meio-ambiente/. Accessed 22 Jul 2019
Carvalho I (2019) Em 200 dias, Brasil liberou mais agrotóxicos que a União Europeia em oito anos Available via Brasil de Fato. https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2019/07/18/em-200-dias-brasil-liberou-mais-agrotoxicos-que-a-uniao-europeia-em-oito-anos. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.
Correia M (2019) ‘Eficiência’ do governo para limpar o petróleo do Nordeste: doenças e esgotamento dos voluntários. Available via The intercept Brazil. https://theintercept.com/2019/10/24/voluntarios-intoxicados-oleo-nordeste-bolsonaro/. Accessed 22 Nov 2019
Fellet J (2019) Índios se aliam a antigos inimigos contra planos de Bolsonaro na Amazônia. Available via BBC. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-49528317. Accessed 20 Set 2019
Khadka D, Nepal SK (2010) Local responses to participatory conservation in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ Manag 45:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9405-6
Kujawski D (2019) Sínodo da Amazônia: novos caminhos para a igreja e para uma ecologia integral. Available via Pastoral Carcerária. https://carceraria.org.br/igreja-em-saida/sinodo-da-amazonia-novos-caminhos-para-a-igreja-e-para-uma-ecologia-integral. Accessed 01 Dez 2019
Medeiros A, Albarado E (2013) A teoria da ação dialógica no novo cenário da democracia brasileira. In: Colóquio Internacional Paulo Freire VIII. http://coloquio.paulofreire.org.br/participacao/index.php/coloquio/viii-coloquio/paper/view/124/144. Accessed 29 Sept 2019
Mendonça E (2019) Bolsonaro’s Brazil unlikely to achieve Paris agreement goals: experts. Available via Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2019/09/bolsonaros-brazil-unlikely-to-achieve-paris-agreement-goals-experts/. Accessed 04 Nov 2019
Monedero J (2012) ¿Posdemocracia? Frente al pesimismo de la nostalgia, el optimismo de la desobediencia. Avaliable via Nueva Sociedad. https://nuso.org/articulo/posdemocracia-frente-al-pesimismo-de-la-nostalgia-el-optimismo-de-la-desobediencia/. Accessed 04 Out 2019
Safatle V (2010) A democracia que não veio. Available via Folha de São Paulo. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/poder/po3008201013.htm. Accessed 15 Out 2019
Santos BS (2002) Democratizar a democracia: os caminhos da democracia participativa. Civilização Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro
Schreiber M (2019) STF mantém demarcação de terras indígenas no Ministério da Justiça, ao menos neste ano. Available via BBC. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-49187664. Accessed 08 Out 2019
Senra R (2019) Bolsonaro quer revogar decreto ambiental e usar dinheiro saudita para criar ‘Cancún brasileira’ em Angra. Available via BBC. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/geral-50229887. Accessed 04 Out 2019
Simões M (2019) Pesquisadora é perseguida após comprovar que não existe dose segura de agrotóxicos. Available via Sul21. https://www.sul21.com.br/ultimas-noticias/geral/2019/09/pesquisadora-e-perseguida-apos-comprovar-que-nao-existe-dose-segura-de-agrotoxicos/. Accessed 12 Nov 2019
Soares I (2019) Decreto de Bolsonaro reduz composição do Conama de 96 conselheiros para 23. Available via Correio Brasiliense Política. https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/politica/2019/05/29/interna_politica,758531/decreto-de-bolsonaro-reduz-composicao-do-conama-de-100-conselheiros-pa.shtml. Accessed 1 Jul 2019
Strassburg BBN (2019) Conservation provides multiple wins for Brazil. Nat Ecol Evol 3:508–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0856-8
Sullivan L (2019) Conservation in context: toward a systems framing of decentralized governance and public participation in wildlife management. Rev Policy Res 36:242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12326
Swyngedouw E, Kaika M, Castro E (2002) Urban water: a political-ecology perspective. Built Environ 28:124–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/23288796
Terra de Direitos (2019) In: Ribeiro D, Borges L, Bittencourt N et al. O que está acontecendo no Brasil? Nova gestão presidencial: desmantelamento de políticas sociais e violações de direitos humanos. Available via Terra de Direitos. https://terradedireitos.org.br/uploads/arquivos/NOVO-Informativo-A3%2D%2D-Brasil%2D%2D-4pgs.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2019
Trigueiro A (2019) 15 pontos para entender os rumos da desastrosa política ambiental no governo Bolsonaro. Available via G1. https://g1.globo.com/natureza/blog/andre-trigueiro/post/2019/06/03/15-pontos-para-entender-os-rumos-da-desastrosa-politica-ambiental-no-governo-bolsonaro.ghtml. Accessed 12 Out 2019
Turreira-García N, Lund JF, Domínguez P et al (2018) What’s in a name? Unpacking “participatory” environmental monitoring. Ecol Soc 23(2):24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10144-230224
Wike R, Silver L, Castillo A (2019) Many across the globe are dissatisfied with how democracy is working. Avaliable via pew research center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/04/29/many-across-the-globe-are-dissatisfied-with-how-democracy-is-working/. Accessed Set 25 2019
Acknowledgments
CB thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the Productivity Grant Fellowship (Process number 308628/2016-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldauf, C. (2020). Reflections on Democracy and the Participation of Society in Biodiversity Conservation. In: Baldauf, C. (eds) Participatory Biodiversity Conservation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41686-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41686-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41685-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41686-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)