Skip to main content

Three Senses of Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freedom, Responsibility, and Therapy
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

There are two main questions: Why should a counselor advise taking responsibility at all? What senses of responsibility can be helpful for psychotherapy? I will argue that there are minimally three senses of responsibility (role, capacity, and causal responsibility) that are conducive for therapeutic work. To recapitulate, role responsibility implies that the agent has a certain duty or an obligation; causal responsibility means that there is a causal connection between the outcome and the agent’s preceding behavior; and capacity responsibility signifies that the agent has certain capacities (choice, self-control) which make them eligible for moral relations. I will argue that these senses of responsibility serve many vital functions, helping to increase self-awareness, to augment self-control, and to contribute to moral relations, to name just a few.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is one passage that could indicate that Freud talks about liability-responsibility in the above-mentioned passage. One of the sentences contains the word “blameless”, and, as we remember, the idea of blame is one of the attributes of liability responsibility. As Freud puts it, “It is true that in the metapsychological sense this bad repressed content does not belong to my ‘ego’—that is, assuming that I am a morally blameless individual—but to an ‘id’” (ibid.). But there is a potential for misinterpretation here. In the original, the phrase “blameless individual” is written as “moralisch untadeliger Mensch”, which literally denotes “morally impeccable person” (1925, 133). The important point is that nothing is said about blaming oneself. What Freud says essentially is that people should not think of themselves as virtuously perfect creatures, who are unable to have any egocentric or devilish impulses. Since people have the id, they are disposed by their nature to have some impulses which they might dislike or which would run counter to moral codes.

  2. 2.

    In the German original text, the word “being” has a counterpart “Wesen”, which could also be translated as “nature” or “character”. “Wenn der – richting verstandene – Trauminhalt nicht die Eingebung fremder Geister ist, so ist er ein Stück von meinem Wesen” (1925, 133).

  3. 3.

    For a detailed discussion of self-knowledge and issues, such as how people can know themselves and to what extent, see (Cassam 2014).

  4. 4.

    A parapraxis (a Freudian slip) is a minor involuntary fault in action (unintended move), memory (forgetfulness), and speech (slips of the tongue, pen), which psychoanalysts interpret as the impact of unconscious forces (subdued memories, repressed wishes, etc.). The ordinary examples are calling someone by the wrong name, misquoting, and misplacing objects. According to Freud, these errors reveal the true thoughts, feelings, desires, and attitudes that people may hold in their unconscious. Freud introduced this concept in his famous work “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life” (1901).

  5. 5.

    Things that the person must remember or can forget concerns research in the ethics of memory (Bernecker and Michaelian 2017). Some scholars argue that people could have a moral obligation to remember certain things or events from the past, such as crimes against humanity to preserve the memory of radical evil (Blustein 2012; Rieff 2016).

References

  • Balch, Charles M., Julie A. Freischlag, and Tait D. Shanafelt. 2009. Stress and Burnout Among Surgeons: Understanding and Managing the Syndrome and Avoiding the Adverse Consequences. Archives of Surgery 144 (4): 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernecker, Sven, and Kourken Michaelian, eds. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. 1st ed. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, Jeffrey. 2012. The Moral Demands of Memory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. A Duty to Remember. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory, ed. Sven Bernecker and Kourken Michaelian, 1st ed., 351–363. London, New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cassam, Quassim. 2014. Self-Knowledge for Humans. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1900/2001a. ‘The Interpretation of Dreams’. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 4. London: Vintage, Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1901/2001b. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 6. London: Vintage, Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1905/2001c. Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 7. London: Vintage, Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1925/2001d. Some Additional Notes Оn Dream-Interpretation as а Whole. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 19. London: Vintage, Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. Wallace, and Claire L. Kruger. 2014. Hayes’ Principles and Methods of Toxicology. 6th ed. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Anne M., Nicola Swain, and Gareth J. Treharne. 2011. Taking Personal Responsibility for Well-Being Increases Birth Satisfaction of First Time Mothers. Journal of Health Psychology 16 (8): 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311403521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwanaga, Makoto, Hiroshi Yokoyama, and Hidetoshi Seiwa. 2000. Effects of Personal Responsibility and Latitude for Type a and b Individuals on Psychological and Physiological Stress Responses. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 7 (3): 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327558IJBM0703_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou, Rong-Chang, Chung-Wei Kuo, and Mei-Ling Tang. 2013, October. A Study of Job Stress and Turnover Tendency among Air Traffic Controllers: The Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction. In Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Selected Papers from the 15th ATRS Conference, Sydney 2011, 57: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J., and J. Rodin. 1976. The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34 (2): 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lear, Jonathan. 2015. Freud. 2nd ed. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Neil. 2014. Consciousness and Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loewald, Hans W. 1980. Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallers, Melanie H., Maria Claver, and Lisa A. Lares. 2014. Perceived Control in the Lives of Older Adults: The Influence of Langer and Rodin’s Work on Gerontological Theory, Policy, and Practice. The Gerontologist 54 (1): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Robin, and Toby D. Wall. 1989. Attentional Demand and Cost Responsibility as Stressors in Shopfloor Jobs. Academy of Management Journal 32 (1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/256420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, Nancy. 2011. Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Lacie M. 2007. Personal Responsibility and Volunteering After a Natural Disaster: The Case of Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Spectrum 27 (6): 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170701533855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael S. 1984. Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship. CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, David. 2016. In Praise of Forgetting: Historical Memory and Its Ironies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., and E.J. Langer. 1977. Long-Term Effects of a Control-Relevant Intervention with the Institutionalized Aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (12): 897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Carl Ransom. 1961/1995. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Carl Ransom, Howard Kirschenbaum, and Valerie Land Henderson. 1989. The Carl Rogers Reader. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beliavsky, V. (2020). Three Senses of Responsibility. In: Freedom, Responsibility, and Therapy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41571-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics