Skip to main content

Exploring the Role of Actors in the Formation of Market Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Customer-Supplier Relationships in B2B

Abstract

This chapter is an overview of the theoretical underpinnings of the volume, the research question and the study approach. In the first part we discuss the reasons for addressing the issue of business relationships and interaction. The discussion of the reasons why, in business markets, relationships matter both for the development of the single businesses and of the business network (market) at large engenders addressing the question of how do these relationships form, emerge and develop? Past research on the dynamics of business relationships shows that interaction is a critical process in the formation of business relationships. The way actors behave, act and react in their interactions depends on how they perceive and interpret each other’s features and characteristics. Consequently, the research question that permeates the volume is: how do actors attribute identities to counterparts with whom they interact in business relationships? We develop two propositions that constitute the file rouge of the book: (1) attributed identity tends to be relationship specific; and (2) identities are always emergent and change from interaction to interaction. The chapter ends with presenting how we explored empirically these two propositions by following a company’s sales force and participating in meetings with 32 customers and interviewing sales representatives and representatives of the customer organisations before and after the meetings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaboen, L., La Rocca, A., Lind, F., Perna, A., & Shih, T. (Eds.) (2017). Starting-up in business networks: Why relationships matter in entrepreneurship. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, M., Havenvid, I. M., & La Rocca, A. (2017). Researching the interactive business landscape. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 253–273). Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassi, M. (1995). Governance factors in a network process approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggemann, S., & Buttle, F. (2007). The effects of previous episodes in business-to-business interaction. Management Research News, 30(6), 396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2004). Linking customer management effort to customer profitability in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cespedes, F. V. (1995). Managing marketing linkages: Text, cases, and readings. Caddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, G. (1992). Industrial networks: A review. In B. Axelsson & G. Easton (Eds.), Industrial Networks. A New View of Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiocca, R. (1980). L’analisi del portafoglio clienti nel marketing industriale. In R. Fiocca (Ed.), Il marketing dei beni industriali. Giuffrè: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Håkansson, H. (2006). The idea of interaction. IMP Journal, 1(1), 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., Mattsson, L.-E., & Snehota, I. (2017). Management in the interactive business world. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 27–46). Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Persson, G. (2010). Supply network strategies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1987). Stability and change in network relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, S., & Finch, J. H. (2009). Industrial sales people as market actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6), 608–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2007). In search of a new logic for marketing: Foundations of contemporary theory. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guercini, S., La Rocca, A., Runfola, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Interaction behaviors in business relationships and heuristics: Issues for management and research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 929–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guercini, S., La Rocca, A., Runfola, A., & Snehota, I. (2015). Heuristics in customer-supplier interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guercini, S., & Runfola, A. (2014). Actors’ roles in interaction and innovation in local systems: A conceptual taxonomy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(3/4), 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2009). Business in networks. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationship in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2017). No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world. Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2013). A never ending story—Interaction patterns and economic development. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, A., Salmi, A., & Havila, V. (1999). From dyadic change to changing business network: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 779–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallén, L., Johanson, J., & Sayed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptations in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N., & Rust, R. T. (2002). Customer Equity Management: Charting New Directions for the Future of Marketing. Journal of Service Research, 5(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund, M. (2004). Analyzing business relationships and distinguishing different interaction levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, M. D., & Speh, T. W. (2013). Business marketing management B2B. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2011). Markets as networks: Implications for strategy-making. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 484–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A. (2013). Approaching (inter-) actors in the business landscape. The IMP Journal, 7(3), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A., Hoholm, T., & Mørk, B. E. (2017). Practice theory and the study of interaction in business relationships—Some methodological implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A., Moscatelli, P., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Customer involvement in new product development in B2B: The role of sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2011). Knowledge in use when actors interact in business relationships. The IMP Journal, 5(2), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Relating in business networks: Innovation in practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 441–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Corporate associations in B2B: Coping with multiple relationship-specific identities. The IMP Journal, 10(1), 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, A., & Wynstra, F. (2005). Value in business markets: What do we know? Where are we going? Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7), 732–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, L. G., Corsaro, D., & Ramos, C. (2015). Sense-making in business markets–The interplay between cognition, action and outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, F. J. (1999). Customer profitability analysis: Measurement, concentration, and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard, K., Olsen, P. I., & Prenkert, F. (2017). Boundaries of business actors and networks—Theoretical and methodological reflections. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 213–233). Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, W. J. (2015). How buyer roles and critical times affect buyer-supplier exchange episodes. IMP Journal, 11(3), 376–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2013). Relationship velocity: Toward a theory of relationship dynamics. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, P. E., Haskins, M. E., & Conroy, R. M. (2005). Customer lifetime value, customer profitability, and the treatment of acquisition spending. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(1), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurr, P. H., Hedaa, L., & Geersbro, J. (2008). Interaction episodes as engines of relationship change. Journal of Business Research, 61(8), 877–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, J. E., Mohr, D. C., Zickar, M. J., & Highhouse, S. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006). Value-based differentiation in business relationships: Gaining and sustaining key supplier status. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waluszewski, A., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2017). Researching the interactive business world; interplay of research object, methodology and theory. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 195–212). Emerald: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waluszewski, A., Snehota, I., & La Rocca, A. (2019). What remains to be discovered? Manifesto for researching the interactive business world. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(1), 232–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayland, R. E., & Cole, P. M. (1997). Customer connections: New strategies for growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella La Rocca .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

La Rocca, A. (2020). Exploring the Role of Actors in the Formation of Market Relationships. In: Customer-Supplier Relationships in B2B. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40993-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics