Skip to main content

On-Premise or Cloud Enterprise Application Deployment: Fit-Gap Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 378))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The fit-gap analysis of enterprise applications allows to identify their customization needs during implementation at a company. The enterprise applications provide a set of customization tools and customization flexibility is affected by a deployment mode. The on-premise deployment requires effort to install the application and its updates while there are a few restrictions on depths and breath of customization. The cloud deployment of Software as a Service applications is easier to setup while there are some restrictions of kind of customizations made. This paper elaborates an optimization model to select an enterprise application customization strategy as a part of the fit-gap analysis in the case of the choice between on-premise and cloud deployment of the enterprise application. The model also takes into account newly released standard features provided by the vendor of the enterprise applications. The model analysis is performed to investigate factors affecting the choice between on-premise and cloud deployment and an impact of company’s customization preferences on the gaps resolution strategy. An application example is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weng, F., Hung, M.C.: Competition and challenge on adopting cloud ERP. Int. J. Innovation Manage. Technol. 5(4), 309–313 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jadhav, A.S., Sonar, R.M.: Evaluating and selecting software packages: a review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(3), 555–563 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gulledge, T.R.: ERP gap-fit analysis from a business process orientation. Int. J. Serv. Stan. 2(4), 339–348 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aslam, U., Coombs, C., Doherty, N.F.: Benefits realization from ERP systems: the role of customization. In: ECIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parthasarathy, S., Daneva, M.: An approach to estimation of degree of customization for ERP projects using prioritized requirements. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 471–487 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zach, O., Munkvold, B.E.: Identifying reasons for ERP system customization in SMEs: a multiple case study. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 25(5), 462–478 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kholeif, A.O., Abdel - Kader, M., Sherer, M.: ERP customization failure: institutionalized accounting practices, power relations and mark et forces. J. Account. Organ. Change 3, 250–269 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabis, J.: Optimization of gaps resolution strategy in implementation of ERP systems. In: Proceeding of ICEIS, no. 1, pp. 84–92 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erazo, J., Arboleda, H., Pino, F.J.: Analysis of the software implementation process for ERP systems. In: 12th Colombian Conference on Computing, CCC 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 735, pp. 297–312 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, W., Strong, D.M.: A framework for evaluating ERP implementation choices. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 51(3), 322–333 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hustad, E., Haddara, M., Kalvenes, B.: ERP and organizational misfits: an ERP customization journey. Procedia Comput. Sci. 100, 429–439 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali, A.Q., Sultan, A.B.M., Ghani, A.A.A., Zulzalil, H.: Systematic mapping study on the customization solutions of software as a service applications. IEEE Access 7, 88196–88217 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parthasarathy, S., Sharma, S.: Efficiency analysis of ERP packages - a customization perspective. Comput. Ind. 82, 19–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gool, S., Seymour, L.F.: Managing enterprise resource planning system customisation post-implementation: the case of an African petroleum organisation. In: ICEIS 2018 - Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, p. 111 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holsapple, C., Wang, Y., Wu, J.: Empirically testing user characteristics and fitness factors in enterprise resource planning success. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(3), 325–342 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abd, M.A., Nasrb, E.S., Geitha, M.H.: Benefits and challenges of cloud ERP systems – a systematic literature review. Future Comput. Inf. J. 1(1–2), 1–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saeed, I., Juell-Skielse, G., Uppström, E.: Cloud enterprise resource planning adoption: motives & barriers. In: Advances in Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 429–442 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nowak, D., Kurbel, K.: Understanding the flexibility of cloud ERP software. In: Piazolo, F., Geist, V., Brehm, L., Schmidt, R. (eds.) ERP Future 2016. LNBIP, vol. 285, pp. 135–146. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58801-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamerman, P.D.: The SaaS ERP Applications Landscape, Forrester (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keizer, G.: Microsoft puts Dynamics 365 on twice-a-year release cadence, Computerworld, 11 July (2018). https://www.computerworld.com/article/3289388/

  21. Wu, J.H., Shin, S.S., Heng, M.S.H.: A methodology for ERP misfit analysis. Inf. Manage. 44(8), 666–680 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yen, T.S., Idrus, R., Yusof, U.K.: A framework for classifying misfits between enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and business strategies. Asian Acad. Manage. J. 16(2), 53–75 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarfaraz, A., Jenab, K., D’Souza, A.C.: Evaluating ERP implementation choices on the basis of customisation using fuzzy AHP. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(230), 7057–7067 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pajk, D., Kovacic, A.: Fit gap analysis – the role of business process reference models. Econ. Bus. Rev. 15(4), 319–338 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ancveire, I.: Fit gap analysis methods for ERP systems literature review. In: Proceedings of ISACI 2018 - IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, pp. 161–166 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Monat, J.P.: Industrial sales lead conversion modeling. Market. Intell. Plann. 29(2), 178–194 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Qureshi, M.R.J.: Agile software development methodology for medium and large projects. IET Softw. 6(4), 358–363 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leffingwell, D.: Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jānis Grabis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grabis, J. (2020). On-Premise or Cloud Enterprise Application Deployment: Fit-Gap Perspective. In: Filipe, J., Śmiałek, M., Brodsky, A., Hammoudi, S. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40783-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40783-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40782-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40783-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics