Abstract
For over four decades, film studies has found itself divided between two distinct camps, an opposition represented by the different goals, methods, and interests of the British film journals, Screen and Movie. If Screen has stood for critical theory and Movie for aesthetic evaluation, their quarrels have often replicated those between Continental and Analytic philosophers, which, as Richard Rorty noted, profoundly affected the shape of academic careers. How did Screen manage to supplant Movie? What institutional factors encouraged film studies to embrace theory? Why did the work of V.F. Perkins, Movie’s most important writer, get neglected, especially in the United States? How can Wittgenstein writing help us understand what Perkins and the Movie group were up to?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On this point, see Andrew Klevan, “Guessing the Unseen from the Seen: Stanley Cavell and Film Interpretation,” in Contending with Stanley Cavell, ed. Russell B. Goodman (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 118–139.
- 2.
Douglas Pye usefully observes that “A key factor here was availability. Initially, the Movie writers sought out films in cinemas all over London: they had no other access to them. Earlier cinema was largely unavailable to them. Under these circumstances, the accuracy of reference in Movie is amazing.” While I would not dispute Pye’s argument (after all, he was there), I would point out that long after VHS and DVDs made everything available, V.F. Perkins continued to write about Sirk, Welles, Ophuls, and Lang. Tastes form early.
- 3.
Douglas Pye responds to the first question by saying, “Not the cinema in general but perhaps some ways in which many movies might be approached.” To the second question, he proposes that while “another movie would be different, at least some aspects of the approach should be transferable.” My experience with American undergraduates, steeped in theory, makes me less sanguine about the ready transferability of his (and John Gibbs’s) approach.
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor, et al. 1977. Aesthetics and Politics. Trans. Ronald Taylor. London: Verso.
Allen, Richardson, and Malcom Turvey. 2001. Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts. London: Routledge.
Barthes, Roland. 1977a. Image—Music—Text. Trans. Stephen Hearth. New York: Hill & Wang.
———. 1977b. Roland Barthes. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang.
———. 1985. The Responsibility of Forms. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang.
———. 1986. The Rustle of Language. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang.
Benjamin, Walter. 1979. A Small History of Photography. One-Way Street, 240–257. Trans. Edmund Jephcott and Kingsley Shorter. London: NLB.
———. 1983–1984. N [Theoretics of Knowledge, Theory of Progress]. The Philosophical Forum XV (1–2): 1–40.
———. 1999. The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bordwell, David. 1989. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Breton, André. 1974. Manifestoes of Surrealism. Trans. Richard Seaver and Helen R. Lane. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Cameron, Ian, ed. 1972. Movie Reader. New York: Praeger.
Cavell, Stanley. 2005. Cavell on Film. Ed. William Rothman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dolven, Jeff. 2017. Senses of Style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Doyle, Arthur Conan. n.d. The Complete Sherlock Holmes. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
Eckert, Charles. 1985. The Anatomy of Proletariat Film: Warner’s Marked Woman. In Movies and Methods Volume II, ed. Bill Nichols, 407–429. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Edwards, James C. 1982. Ethics Without Philosophy: Wittgenstein and the Moral Life. Gainesville, FL: University Presses of Florida.
Eliot, T.S. 1975. Selected Prose of T.S. Eliot. Ed. Frank Kermode. New York: Harvest-Harcourt.
Fann, K.T., ed. 1967. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Man and His Philosophy. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Foote, Shelby. 1989. Conversations with Shelby Foote. Ed. William C. Carter. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Freud, Sigmund. 1989. The Freud Reader. Ed. Peter Gay. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Friedrich, Otto. 1986. City of Nests: A Portrait of Hollywood in the 1940’s. New York: Harper & Row.
Gallagher, Catherine, and Stephen Greenblatt. 2000. Practicing New Historicism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gibbs, John, and Douglas Pye. 2005. Revisiting Preminger: Bonjour Tristesse (1958) and Close Reading. In Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film, ed. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye, 108–126. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Godard, Jean-Luc. 1972. Godard on Godard. Trans. Tom Milne. New York: The Viking Press.
Hammett, Dashiell. 1987. The Maltese Falcon. San Francisco: North Point Press.
Harvey, James. 1987. Romantic Comedy in Hollywood, from Lubistch to Sturges. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
James, William. 2002. The Varieties of Religious Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klevan, Andrew. 2000. Disclosure of the Everyday: Undramatic Achievement in Narrative Film. Trowbridge: Flicks Books.
———. 2005a. Notes on Teaching Film Style. In Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film, ed. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye, 214–227. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
———. 2005b. ‘What Becomes of Thinking on Film?’ (Stanley Cavell in Conversation with Andrew Klevan). In Film as Philosophy: Essays on Cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell, ed. Rupert Read and Jerry Goodenough, 167–209. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2012. Living Meaning: The Fluency of Film Performance. In Theorizing Film Acting, ed. Aaron Taylor, 33–46. New York: Routledge.
Kracauer, Siegfried. 1995. The Mass Ornament. Trans. Thomas Y. Levin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2000. Theory of Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kronman, Anthony T. 2007. Education’s End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have Given Up on the Meaning of Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Long, Robert Emmet, ed. 2001. John Huston Interviews. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
MacCabe, Colin. 1980. Godard: Images, Sounds, Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
———. 1985. Tracking the Signifier. Theoretical Essays: Film, Linguistics, Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Malcolm, Norman. 1994. Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Marx, Samuel. 1987. A Gaudy Spree: Literary Hollywood When the West Was Fun. New York: Franklin Watts.
McPherson, James. 1996. Drawn with the Sword: Reflections on the American Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morris, Meaghan. 1988. Banality in Cultural Studies. Discourse 10 (2).
Mulvey, Laura. 1985. Visual Pleasure in Narrative Cinema. In Movies and Methods Volume II, ed. Bill Nichols, 303–315. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Murdoch, Iris. 1977. Under the Net. New York: Penguin Books.
Nichols, Bill, ed. 1976. Movies and Methods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Perkins, Victor. 1972. Film as Film. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
———. 1990. Must We Say What They Mean? Film Criticism and Interpretation. Movie 34 (35): 1–6.
———. 1992. In a Lonely Place. In The Book of Film Noir, ed. Ian Cameron, 222–231. New York: Continuum.
———. 2005. Where Is the World? The Horizon of Events in Movie Fiction. In Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film, ed. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye, 16–41. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Porte, Joel. 2001. The Problem of Emerson. In Emerson’s Poetry and Prose, ed. Joel Porte and Saundra Morris, 679–697. New York: Norton.
Ray, Robert B. 1995. The Avant-Garde Finds Andy Hardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2008. The ABCs of Classic Hollywood. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rohdie, Sam. 1972. Review: Movie Reader, Film as Film. Screen 13 (4): 135–145.
Rorty, Richard. 1982. The Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 2007. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatz, Thomas. 1988. The Genius of the System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era. New York: Pantheon Books.
Taussig, Michael. 1987. Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomson, David. 2010. The New Biographical Dictionary of Film. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Toles, George. 2001. A House of Light: Essays on the Art of Film. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Vendler, Helen. 1997. The Art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Willey, Basil. 1953. The Seventeenth Century Background. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Williams, Linda. 2000. Discipline and Fun: Psycho and Postmodern Cinema. In Reinventing Film Studies, ed. Christine Gledhill and Linda Williams. London: Arnold.
Wilson, George M. 1986. Narration in Light: Studies in Cinematic Point of View. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1965. The Blue and Brown Books (BB). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
———. 1970. Zettel. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1980. Culture and Value (CV). Trans. Peter Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago Books.
———. 2001a. Philosophical Investigations (PI). Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 2001b. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935. Ed. Alice Ambrose. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ray, R.B. (2020). Screen vs. Movie: The Great Divide in Film Studies. In: The Structure of Complex Images. Palgrave Close Readings in Film and Television. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40631-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40631-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40630-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40631-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)