Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Archimedes ((ARIM,volume 57))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines John Locke’s conceptions of the soul, the understanding and the self in order to shed light on his preoccupation with his own mental and bodily wellbeing. A practitioner of both philosophy and physic, Locke provides a fascinating case study of early modern self-diagnosis. His rich and innovative account of the self, with its focus on the moral self, the conscience and having a property in one’s own person, provide the backdrop from which we can understand his concerns and prescriptions for the health of the body and the mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Locke’s self-diagnosis and treatment for his tertian ague in his journal, see Dewhurst 1963, 80–82.

  2. 2.

    For further discussion, see Anstey 2015, 221–225.

  3. 3.

    For a thorough treatment, see Stuart 2013, chaps 9 and 10.

  4. 4.

    See Anstey 2015, 229–234.

  5. 5.

    See, for example, Second Reply to the Bishop of Worcester, Locke Works, 4: 301–334.

  6. 6.

    See Weinberg 2016, 147 n. 7.

  7. 7.

    The best survey and analysis is in Thiel 2011, Parts II and III.

  8. 8.

    For further discussion, see Coventry and Kriegel 2008.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Rickless 2015 and LoLordo 2012 and for criticisms of LoLordo, Anstey 2013b.

  10. 10.

    As Locke himself pointed out. See E II. xxvii. 20.

  11. 11.

    Reid 2002, 276.

  12. 12.

    See Mattern 1980.

  13. 13.

    Locke never revised his notion of what it is to have a property in one’s person in the light of his concept of person introduced in the second edition of the Essay. Nor does he seem to have made any attempt to incorporate his concept of property into the Essay. See Shimokawa 2006, 180.

  14. 14.

    Actually, in the first four editions of the Essay Locke had written ‘rational Creatures’. The fact that he changed this to ‘rational Beings’ in the fifth (posthumous) edition is most likely an attempt to conform this passage more closely to the chapter on personal identity, E II. xxvii.

  15. 15.

    See Wolterstorff 1996 for a thorough discussion. See also Corneanu 2011, 154–160.

  16. 16.

    See Anstey 2013a, 321–325.

  17. 17.

    Locke uses the term ‘real knowledge’ in a more constrained and technical sense in E IV. iv.

  18. 18.

    See Yeo 2009.

  19. 19.

    I should like to thank Sorana Corneanu, Gideon Manning, Kiyoshi Shimokawa and the participants at the ‘Testimonies: States of Mind and States of the Body in the Early Modern Period’ at Caltech in May 2014 for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Abbreviations

Corr. :

Locke, John. The Correspondence of John Locke, 8 vols, ed. Esmond S. de Beer. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–1989.

E :

Locke, John. An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

Locke Works :

Locke, John. The Works of John Locke, 10 vols. London: Tegg, 1823.

STCE :

Locke, John. Some Thoughts Concerning Education, eds John W. Yolton and Jean S. Yolton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.

Bibliography

  • Anstey, Peter R. 2011. John Locke and natural philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Locke on human understanding. In The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. Peter R. Anstey, 310–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Review of Antonia LoLordo’s Locke’s Moral Man. Mind 122: 1146–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. John Locke and the philosophy of mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corneanu, Sorana. 2011. Regimens of the mind: Boyle, Locke, and the cultura animi tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, Angela, and Uriah Kriegel. 2008. Locke on consciousness. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25: 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, Kenneth. 1963. John Locke 1632–1704: Physician and philosopher. London: Wellcome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1823. The works of John Locke, 10 vols. London: Tegg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. In The educational writings of John Locke, ed. James L. Axtell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. In An essay concerning human understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976–1989. The correspondence of John Locke, 8 vols, ed. Esmond S. de Beer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. In Two treatises of government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. In Some thoughts concerning education, ed. John W. Yolton and Jean S. Yolton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoLordo, Antonia. 2012. Locke’s moral man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, Ruth. 1980. Moral science and the concept of persons in Locke. Philosophical Review 89: 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Thomas. 2002. In Essays on the intellectual powers of man, ed. Derek Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickless, Samuel. 2015. Are Locke’s persons modes or substances? In Locke and Leibniz on substance, ed. Paul Lodge and Tom Stoneham, 110–127. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimokawa, Kiyoshi. 2006. Locke’s concept of property. In John Locke: Critical assessments of leading philosophers, 4 vols, Vol. 1, ed. Peter R. Anstey, 177–216. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Matthew. 2013. Locke’s metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, Udo. 2011. The early modern subject: Self-consciousness and personal identity from descartes to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Shelley. 2016. Consciousness in Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1996. John Locke and the ethics of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, Richard. 2009. John Locke on conversation with friends and strangers. Parergon 26: 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Anstey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anstey, P.R. (2020). Lockean Self-Diagnosis. In: Manning, G. (eds) Testimonies: States of Mind and States of the Body in the Early Modern Period. Archimedes, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39375-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39375-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39374-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39375-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics