Abstract
Conducting international student assessments requires clear target aims, precise methodology, and careful coordination of survey construction, data collection, analysis and reporting mechanisms. This chapter outlines the aims and approaches of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), highlighting similarities and differences compared with assessments conducted by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). It describes the manner in which these international student assessments have helped steer policy dialogue and decisions at the international and regional levels. It concludes with a critical review of current approaches and practices in light of future possibilities, especially in view of future student monitoring.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In PISA teacher data are linked to student data at the school level, but not at the individual student level.
References
Bietenbeck, J. (2014). Teaching practices and cognitive skills. Labour Economics, 30, 143–153.
Carabaña, J. (2015). La inutilidad de PISA para las escuelas. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Méndez, I., Denis, V., & Rech, G. (2016). How teachers teach and students learn: Successful strategies for school. In Education working papers 130. Paris: OECD Publishing.
European Commission. (2018). Education and training monitor 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
Hogrebe, N., & Strietholt, R. (2016). Does non-participation in preschool affect children’s reading achievement? International evidence from propensity score analyses. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 2.
Hooper, M. (2016). Developing the TIMSS 2015 context questionnaires. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, MA.
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353.
Kaplan, D. (2016). Causal inference with large-scale assessments in education from a Bayesian perspective: A review and synthesis. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 7.
LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, MA.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). The policies that inspired PISA – and the policies that PISA inspired: 2009 report on the evaluation of the policy impact of PISA, OECD document EDU/PISA/GB(2008)35/REV2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris: PISA/OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: PISA/OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013c). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Synergies for better learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: PISA/OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Technical report. Paris: PISA/OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018a). Education policy outlook 2018: Putting student learning at the centre. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018b). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. Paris: PISA/OECD Publishing.
Pokropek, A. (2016). Introduction to instrumental variables and their application to large-scale assessment data. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 4.
Rosén, M., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2016). Is computer availability at home causally related to reading achievement in grade 4? A longitudinal difference in differences approach to IEA data from 1991 to 2006. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 5.
Rutkowski, D., & Delandshere, G. (2016). Causal inferences with large scale assessment data: Using a validity framework. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 6.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Gottingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365–379.
Wagemaker, H. (2008). Choices and trade-offs: Reply to McGaw. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 267–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ikeda, M., Echazarra, A. (2020). International Student Assessment: Aims, Approaches and Challenges. In: Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., Stang, J. (eds) Monitoring Student Achievement in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38968-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38969-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)