Skip to main content

Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: An Updated Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

Abstract

Green supply chain management is concerned with the integration of environmental criteria and sustainability issues in the management of the supply chain. Within this framework, firms applying internally green strategy have, naturally, the interest to pressure purchases of goods and services from suppliers that are themselves green, at least to a certain extent. Thus, Supplier Evaluation and Selection is crucial due to its big impact on business function. The prospect of applying green principles has consequently become an important feature of a supplier’s overall performance. Hence, green supplier selection and evaluation, although a relatively new research subject, has grown quite rapidly. It develops and studies the decision and evaluation models based on environmental criteria. Its main tools are based on multi-criteria decision making approaches. Our objective, in this paper, is to review journal articles published in the period 2012–2019 on this topic, in order to identify the most widely applied approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection and the most cited green criteria.

Our research methodology in inducing the present review has been based on several criteria for the selection of the appropriate articles relevant to the subject. The analysis of those papers has led to an extended classification with respect to the multi-criteria decision making approaches, as well as with respect to the adopted green criteria.

We conclude that the majority of applied approaches are based on integrated fuzzy models and that the most popular criteria are “Environmental management system” and “Green design”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Baset, M. C. (2019). An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field. Computers in Industry, 106, 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-Basset, M. M. (2018). A hybrid neutrosophic group ANP-TOPSIS framework for supplier selection problems. Symmetry, 10(6), 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akman, G. (2015). Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. S. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, A. G. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, M. J. (2015). A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & Operations Research, 54, 274–285.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Azadnia, A. H. (2015). Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: An integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbar, C. (2018). A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 92, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaeian, N. M. (2015). Criteria definition and approaches in green supplier selection–a case study for raw material and packaging of food industry. Production & Manufacturing Research, 3(1), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaeian, N. M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337–347.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, V. N. (2012). Indian textile suppliers’ sustainability evaluation using the grey approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), B-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, A. P. (2019). Lean and green supplier selection problem: A novel multi objective linear programming model for an electronics board manufacturing company in Turkey. In Multiple criteria decision making and aiding (pp. 281–309). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C. (2012). A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 64(8), 2544–2557.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chithambaranathan, P. S. (2015). Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, P. R. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, B. M. (2019). Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbiyik, H. B. (2016). Analytic hierarchy process method for supplier selection considering green logistics: Case study of aluminum production sector. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(8), 2867–2871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falatoonitoosi, E. L. (2013). Modeling for green supply chain evaluation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallahpour, A. O. (2016). An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: Application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallahpour, A. O. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. J. (2007). Incorporating sustainable business practices into company strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2015). Green supplier selection using an AHP-entropy-TOPSIS framework. Supply Chain Management. An International Journal, 20(3), 327–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gören, H. G. (2018). A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1156–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K. R. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K. S. (2016). Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: Integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches. Annals of Operations Research, 238(1–2), 243–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, H. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 242–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurel, O. A. (2015). Determinants of the green supplier selection. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeri, S. A. (2019). A grey-based green supplier selection model for uncertain environments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 768–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1995). The natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, S. H. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X. (2018). Supplier selection study under the respective of low-carbon supply chain: A hybrid evaluation model based on FA-DEA-AHP. Sustainability, 10(2), 564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. W. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junior, F. R. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D. K. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D. d. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D. G. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. A.-S.-S. (2018). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: A framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 964–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T. C. (1973). The effect of ecological concern. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(2), 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. J. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. H. (2015). Developing a green supplier selection model by using the DANP with VIKOR. Sustainability, 7(2), 1661–1689.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lage Junior, M. (2010). Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, J. J. (2016). New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. C. (2019). A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 486, 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, H. W. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, S. G. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan, K. S. (2018). Modeling the criteria for selection of suppliers towards green aspect: A case in Indian automobile industry. Opsearch, 55(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, A. H. (2019). A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Production Economics., 217, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic, S. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Orji, I. J. (2014). A decision support tool for sustainable supplier selection in manufacturing firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 7(5), 1293–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orji, I. J. (2015). An innovative integration of fuzzy-logic and systems dynamics in sustainable supplier selection: A case on manufacturing industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishchulov, G. T. (2019). The voting analytic hierarchy process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 211, 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, B. M. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J. L. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 626–638.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. N. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostamzadeh, R. G. (2015). Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecological Indicators, 49, 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182–8192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. S. (2013). Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach. International Journal of Operational Research, 17(2), 215–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. O. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, P. Y. (2015). A decision support system to select suppliers for a sustainable supply chain based on a systematic DEA approach. Information Technology and Management, 16(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, R. K. (2015). Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry. Resources Policy, 46, 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzkaya, G. (2013). An intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator based methodology for environmental criteria integrated supplier evaluation process. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(3), 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van, L. Y. (2018). New integrated quality function deployment approach based on interval neutrosophic set for green supplier evaluation and selection. Sustainability, 10(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N. B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. A. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operation Research, 50(2), 2–18.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. L. (2013). Supplier selection for outsourcing from the perspective of protecting crucial product knowledge. International Journal of Production Research, 51(5), 1508–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2016). An integrated model for green partner selection and supply chain construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2114–2132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, M. (2014). An integrated MCDM approach to green supplier selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(3), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, M. H. (2016). New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1097–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, M. C. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. (2014). Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability. Sustainability, 6(1), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. (2018). An integrated sustainable supplier selection approach based on hybrid information aggregation. Sustainability, 10(7), 2543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (2001). Fuzzy set theory and its applications (4th ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Recuperado el 26 de 05 de 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the members of the Business Economics and Management department in the CIHEAM-Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania for their help and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Appendix 3

Illustrative table of literature on green supplier selection and evaluation. (DOCX 51 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1 Table of Classification of Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches

Class

Approaches

No. of articles

Authors

Single approaches under fuzzy sets

TODIM under IT2FSs

1

Qin (2017)

CIO under IFSs

1

Tuzkaya (2013)

FTOPSIS

1

Kannan (2014)

FVIKOR

1

Rostamzadeh (2015)

Total

4

 

Hybrid approaches under fuzzy sets

FAHP-FMOLP

1

Shaw (2012)

FAHP-FTOPSIS-MOLP

1

Kannan (2013)

AHP-FTOPSIS

1

Yazdani (2014)

FAHP-MOLP

2

Azadnia (2015), Çalık (2019)

FAD-FMOOM

1

Kannan (2015)

FERM

1

Azadi (2015)

AHP-FMOLP

1

Shaw (2013)

FSD-FTOPSIS

1

Orji (2015)

FDEMATEL-FTOPSIS

1

Orji (2014)

FAHP-FVIKOR

1

Awasthi (2018)

BWM-FTOPSIS

1

Gupta (2017)

FCM-VIKOR

1

Akman (2015)

FPP-FTOPSIS

1

Fallahpour (2017)

FEntropy-FTOPSIS

2

Zhao (2014), dos Santos (2019)

FANP-FDEMATEL-FTOPSIS

1

Büyüközkan (2012)

BWM-FGCM-IGRA

1

Haeri (2019)

FAHP-FTOPSIS-FMOOM

1

Mohammed (2019)

AQM-BWM under IVIUL

1

Liu (2019)

ANP-VIKOR under INSs

1

Abdel-Baset (2019)

QFD-TOPSIS under INSs

1

Van (2018)

FQFD-FMOMM

1

Babbar (2018)

FSE-FIS

1

Khan (2018)

FDEMATEL-TLF-BOM

1

Gören (2018)

ANP-TOPSIS under INSs

1

Abdel-Basset (2018)

BWM-modified FTOPSIS-FMOLP

1

Lo (2018)

FTOPSIS-FVIKOR-FGRA

1

Banaeian (2018)

AHP-Delphi-FGRA-MOLP

1

Banaeian (2015)

KAM-DEA-GP

1

Fallahpour (2016)

FTOPSIS-FMOLP

1

Govindan (2016)

Total

31

 

Single approaches under non-fuzzy sets

DEMATEL

2

Hsu (2013), Falatoonitoosi (2013)

GRA

1

Baskaran (2012)

ANP

1

Chen (2012)

DEA

1

Shi (2015)

VAHP

1

Pishchulov (2019)

AHP

2

Mathiyazhagan (2018), Erbiyik (2016)

Total

8

 

Hybrid approaches under non-fuzzy sets

AHP-VIKOR

1

Luthra (2017)

GDEA

1

Kumar (2014)

Integrated ANP-improved GRA

1

Hashemi (2015)

AHP-entropy-TOPSIS

1

Freeman (2015)

AHP-TLF

1

Sivakumar (2015)

Grey-Electre-VIKOR

1

Chithambaranathan (2015)

DANP-VIKOR

1

Kuo (2015)

DEMATEL-QFD-COPRAS

1

Yazdani (2017

SWARA-QFD-WASPAS

1

Yazdani (2016)

ANP-MOP

1

Wu (2016)

DEMATEL-DANP-modified COPRAS-G

1

Liou (2016)

FA-DEA-AHP

1

He (2018)

Total

12

 

Appendix 2 Table of Classification of Evaluation Criteria

Class

Sub-class

Criteria

Authors

No. of articles

Green governance and capacities

Policies

Staff environmental training

Sivakumar (2015), Liou (2016), Qin (2017), Banaeian (2015), Chithambaranathan (2015), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Gupta (2017), Pishchulov (2019), Hsu (2013), Shaw (2013)

10

Adherence to environmental policies

Chithambaranathan (2015), Kannan (2015), Gupta (2017), Orji (2014, 2015), Abdel-Basset (2018)

6

Environmental protection policy

Mathiyazhagan (2018)

1

Information disclosure

Shaw (2013), Liou (2016), Orji (2014, 2015), Kannan (2015), Chen (2012)

6

Green supplier evaluation

Babbar (2018), Kannan (2014), Büyüközkan (2012), Rostamzadeh (2015), Awasthi (2018), Falatoonitoosi (2013), Gupta (2017), He (2018)

8

Pressuring suppliers for green initiatives on their end

Rostamzadeh (2015), Gupta (2017)

2

Green certification

Chithambaranathan (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Liou (2016), Pishchulov (2019), Çalık (2019), Kannan (2015), Mathiyazhagan (2018)

7

Adoption of environmental code of conduct

Pishchulov (2019)

1

Commitment to green investment

Gupta (2017), Pishchulov (2019), Shaw (2013)

3

Carbon policy

Hsu (2013)

1

Environmental planning

Banaeian (2015), Pishchulov (2019), Chithambaranathan (2015), Gupta (2017)

4

Cooperation for environmental improvement

Kannan (2014), Rostamzadeh (2015), Pishchulov (2019), Chithambaranathan (2015), Büyüközkan (2012)

5

Sub-supplier evaluation and training

Pishchulov (2019), Kannan (2014)

2

Management

Environmental management systems

Luthra (2017), Banaeian (2018), Kannan (2013), Freeman (2015), Yazdani (2014, 2016, 2017), Azadnia (2015), Orji (2014), Banaeian (2015), Akman (2015), Mohammed (2019), dos Santos (2019), Van (2018), Babbar (2018), Khan (2018), Gören (2018), Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015), Liou (2016)

20

Audit of carbon management

Hsu (2013)

1

Management system of carbon information

Hsu (2013)

1

Commitment to environmental management

dos Santos (2019), Liou (2016), Pishchulov (2019), Chen (2012), Hashemi (2015), Chithambaranathan (2015), Yazdani (2017), Haeri (2019), Gupta (2017), Kannan (2014)

10

Green process management

Tuzkaya (2013), Gupta (2017), Kannan (2015)

3

Environmental, legislative management

Qin (2017), Kannan (2014, 2015), Falatoonitoosi (2013), Gupta (2017), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Tuzkaya (2013), Luthra (2017), Chen (2012), Pishchulov (2019), Rostamzadeh (2015)

11

Process auditing

Pishchulov (2019), Kannan (2015)

2

Ensuring supplier EMS adoption

Gupta (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015)

2

Green supply chain management and the level of commitment to it

Wu (2016)

1

Green capabilities

Environmental competencies

Luthra (2017), Qin (2017)

Kannan (2013), Freeman (2015), Yazdani (2014), Orji (2014, 2015), Akman (2015), Chen (2012), Büyüközkan (2012), Pishchulov (2019), Liu (2019)

12

Environmental activity control

Sivakumar (2015)

1

Carbon governance

Hsu (2013)

1

Carbon accounting and inventory

Kuo (2015), Kannan (2015), Wu (2016), Fallahpour (2017)

4

ISO-14001 certification

Freeman (2015), Shaw (2013), Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015)

4

Green market share

Kannan (2015), Chithambaranathan (2015)

2

Ratio of green costumers to total costumers

Kannan (2015)

1

Green organizational activities

Falatoonitoosi (2013), Büyüközkan (2012)

2

Applying lifecycle analysis to execute an eco-report

Liou (2016)

1

Green transportation

Gupta (2017), Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015)

3

Green warehousing

Kannan (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Gupta (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015)

4

Inventory of non-hazardous substances

Mathiyazhagan (2018), Fallahpour (2017)

2

Inventory of hazardous substances

Kuo (2015), Kannan (2015), Abdel-Basset (2018), Pishchulov (2019)

4

Using modern eco-efficient transportation fleet

Rostamzadeh (2015), Fallahpour (2017)

2

Using green fuels

Rostamzadeh (2015), Fallahpour (2017)

2

Encouraging eco-driving to decrease fuel consumption

Rostamzadeh (2015)

1

Avoidance and treatment of hazardous materials

Kannan (2014), Fallahpour (2017), Çalık (2019), Liou (2016), Chen (2012), Kannan (2015)

6

Energy consumption and saving energy

Yazdani (2016), Govindan (2016), Wu (2016), Shi (2015), Pishchulov (2019), Chen (2012), Gupta (2017), Çalık (2019), Shaw (2013)

10

Green manufacturing

Luthra (2017), Abdel-Baset (2019), Lo (2018), Gupta (2017), Chen (2012)

5

Level of use of renewable energy

Pishchulov (2019), Rostamzadeh (2015)

2

Green waste management

Freeman (2015), Yazdani (2014, 2016, 2017), Shaw (2013), Mohammed (2019), Luthra (2017), Pishchulov (2019), Awasthi (2018), Abdel-Baset (2019), Büyüközkan (2012)

11

Re-cycle rate

He (2018), Rostamzadeh (2015), Büyüközkan (2012), Govindan (2016), Kannan (2015), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Pishchulov (2019), Yazdani (2014, 2016, 2017), Fallahpour (2017), Khan (2018), Erbiyik (2016), Shi (2015), Gupta (2017), Babbar (2018)

16

Re-use rate

Kannan (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Büyüközkan (2012), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Erbiyik (2016), Yazdani (2014), Shi (2015), Yazdani (2016, 2017), Babbar (2018)

10

Remanufacturing

Rostamzadeh (2015), Freeman (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Büyüközkan (2012), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Pishchulov (2019), Kannan (2015)

7

Recycled product-treatment-potential

Mathiyazhagan (2018)

1

Cleaner and/or green technology capability

Freeman (2015), Khan (2018), Liou (2016), Qin (2017), Sivakumar (2015), Chithambaranathan (2015), Kannan (2014, 2015), Banaeian (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Büyüközkan (2012), Mathiyazhagan (2018)

12

Environmental amelioration cost

He (2018), Luthra (2017), Tuzkaya (2013), Erbiyik (2016), Gupta (2017)

4

Green manufacturing and product quality

Pre-production

Good use of ICT tools

Chen (2012), Gupta (2017)

2

Green purchasing

Gupta (2017), Chen (2012), Rostamzadeh (2015), Büyüközkan (2012), Mathiyazhagan (2018)

5

Green material selection

Freeman (2015), Chithambaranathan (2015), Yazdani (2014), Banaeian (2015), Awasthi (2018), dos Santos (2019), Khan (2018), Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015), Gupta (2017)

10

Green material coding and recoding

Kannan (2015)

1

Prevention of mixed material

Kannan (2015)

1

Use of waste of other companies

Rostamzadeh (2015), Pishchulov (2019)

2

Commitment to green logistics

Falatoonitoosi (2013), Lo (2018), Büyüközkan (2012), Pishchulov (2019)

4

Production process

Green production

Kannan (2015), Rostamzadeh (2015), Büyüközkan (2012), Pishchulov (2019), Kannan (2014)

5

Level of use of toxic/restricted substances

Freeman (2015)

1

Materials consumption

Pishchulov (2019)

1

Product

Green design

Kannan (2013), Chithambaranathan (2015), Yazdani (2014), Yazdani (2016, 2017), Orji (2014, 2015), Kannan (2015), Akman (2015), dos Santos (2019), Van (2018), Babbar (2018), Gören (2018), Chen (2012), Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015), Kannan (2014), Gupta (2017), Luthra (2017), Pishchulov (2019)

20

Green products

Rostamzadeh (2015), Liou (2016), Pishchulov (2019), Kuo (2015), Kannan (2015), Gupta (2017)

6

Eco-design cost

Azadi (2015)

1

Products reduce the impact on natural resources

Kannan (2015), Fallahpour (2017)

2

Ability to alter the product and process in order to reduce impact on natural resources

Kannan (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Liou (2016), Rostamzadeh (2015), Gupta (2017)

5

Renewable product design

Kannan (2015)

1

Biodegradability

Pishchulov (2019)

1

Post production

Carbon disclosure and report

Hsu (2013), Shaw (2013)

2

Commitment to green marketing

Chen (2012), Pishchulov (2019)

Qin (2017), Freeman (2015), Tuzkaya (2013), Kannan (2015), Akman (2015), Haeri (2019), dos Santos (2019)

9

Sale of excess stock or raw material

Rostamzadeh (2015), Kannan (2014)

2

Sale of scrap and used materials

Rostamzadeh (2015), Kannan (2014)

2

Sale of used equipment

Rostamzadeh (2015), Kannan (2014), Pishchulov (2019)

3

Green packing and labelling

Fallahpour (2017), Rostamzadeh (2015), Kannan (2014), Büyüközkan (2012), Mathiyazhagan (2018), Pishchulov (2019), Freeman (2015), Kannan (2015), Abdel-Basset (2018), Fallahpour (2017), Luthra (2017), Abdel-Baset (2019)

11

Wastewater management

Kannan (2015), Awasthi (2018), Wu (2016), Fallahpour (2017), Shi (2015), Kuo (2015), Pishchulov (2019)

7

Solid waste management

Shaw (2013), Wu (2016), Shi (2015), Kuo (2015)

4

Cost of component disposal

Kannan (2015)

1

Waste electronical equipment management

Orji (2014)

1

Green distribution

Rostamzadeh (2015), Büyüközkan (2012)

2

Innovation and direct ecological impact

Ecological impact

Carbon reduction targets

Gupta (2017), Hsu (2013), Shaw (2013)

3

Natural resources consumption

Qin (2017), Hashemi (2015), Kannan (2013), Fallahpour (2016), Yazdani (2017), Wu (2016), Haeri (2019), dos Santos (2019), Gören (2018), Chen (2012), Gupta (2017)

11

Sustainable land use

Pishchulov (2019), Awasthi (2018), Khan (2018)

3

Volume of waste water produced

Awasthi (2018), Khan (2018), Pishchulov (2019)

3

Volume of solid waste

Pishchulov (2019)

1

Volume of liquid waste

Pishchulov (2019), Shaw (2013)

2

Volume of hazardous waste

Fallahpour (2017), Pishchulov (2019), Kannan (2015), Chen (2012)

4

Pollution production

Qin (2017), Azadnia (2015)

Baskaran (2012), Haeri (2019), Mohammed (2019), dos Santos (2019)

6

Pollution prevention

Akman (2015), Kuo (2015)

2

Pollution control

Fallahpour (2016), Chithambaranathan (2015), Tuzkaya (2013), Kannan (2015), Orji (2014), Wu (2016), Haeri (2019), Van (2018), Liou (2016), Mathiyazhagan (2018)

10

Environmental footprint

Shi (2015), Shaw (2013)

2

Gas emission

Kuo (2015), Kannan (2015), Wu (2016), Fallahpour (2017), Van (2018, Çalık (2019), He (2018), Pishchulov (2019), Kumar (2014), Shaw (2012), Azadnia (2015), Govindan (2016), Shi (2015), Pishchulov (2019), Awasthi (2018), Khan (2018)

15

Environmental efficiency

Pishchulov (2019), Lo (2018), Fallahpour (2017), Kannan (2015), Chen (2012), Rostamzadeh (2015), Gupta (2017)

7

Environmental risk

Shaw (2013), Chen (2012)

2

Carbon risk assessment

Hsu (2013), Shaw (2013)

2

Biodiversity

Awasthi (2018)

1

Degree of water pollution

Pishchulov (2019)

1

Environmental adaptability

Abdel-Basset (2018)

1

Carbon verification

Hsu (2013)

1

Level of use of non-renewable resources

Wu (2016)

1

Gaseous residue of manufacturing

Shaw (2013)

1

Development potential

Green R&D investments

Gupta (2017), Fallahpour (2017), Pishchulov (2019)

3

Green product innovation

Tuzkaya (2013), Kannan (2015), Fallahpour (2017), Qin (2017), Luthra (2017), Chithambaranathan (2015), Gupta (2017)

7

Technical assistance for technology up gradation

Gupta (2017)

1

Increasing innovation capabilities

Chen (2012), Lo (2018), Yazdani (2017)

3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jemaa, S., Alayidi, A., Migdalas, A., Baourakis, G., Drakos, P. (2020). Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: An Updated Literature Review. In: Krassadaki, E., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis, C., Matsatsinis, N. (eds) Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38766-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics