Abstract
It is well known that schools and their work are highly dependent on and influenced by the societal values, history and political situation in the specific country where they are located (Ärlestig et al. 2016). School agencies and their role are not as well described in research as school districts and the impact of school communities. One reason for this disparity might be the considerable variation between different countries, with respect to the earlier little-studied aspects of school agencies and their role.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, M. (2006). Being a school councillor in a government secondary college in Victoria: Constructions of role and meaning. Doctor of Education thesis, The University of Melbourne.
Ärlestig, H., Day, C., & Johansson, O. (2016). A decade of research on school principals: Cases from 24 countries. Dordrecht: Springer.
Colebatch, H. K. (2006). Beyond the policy cycle. The policy process in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary expanded ed.). New York: Sage.
Magnusson, E. M. (2018). Vad händer i själva verket? Om styrning och handlingsutrymme i Skolverket under åren 1991–2014. [What happens in reality. About Governance and Room to Maneuver in the Swedish National Agency for Education 1991–2014, in Swedish. Thesis. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of normalization process theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554.
Paudel, N. R. (2009). A critical account of policy implementation theories: Status and reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, xxv(2), 36–54.
Simola, H., Kauko, J., Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M., & Sahlström, F. (2017). Dynamics in education politics. Understanding and explaining the Finnish case. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Whitcombe, J. (2008). Contributions and challenges of ‘new public management’: New Zealand since 1984. Policy Quarterly, 4(3), 7–13. https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/pq/article/view/4259/3760
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johansson, O., Ärlestig, H. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Central Aspects. In: Ärlestig, H., Johansson, O. (eds) Educational Authorities and the Schools. Educational Governance Research, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38759-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38759-4_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38758-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38759-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)