Abstract
Cloud computing is an important paradigm of information technology that entirely depends upon virtualization technique. Multi-tenancy is one of the most important characteristic and it is applicable in all deployment models. Another significant feature of cloud is its distributed nature which includes jurisdictions of various geographical areas. Due to these two characteristics, it is a complex and tedious task to collect data, proof and evidences in cloud whenever compared with traditional digital forensic. New mechanisms and frameworks are required to apply digital forensic techniques in cloud computing environment. In this research paper, an effort has been made to expound prominent techniques that can be applied to perform digital forensic analysis and investigation in cloud computing environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Columbus, L.: Public Cloud Soaring to $331B By 2022 According to Gartner. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2019/04/07/public-cloud-soaring-to-331b-by-2022-according-to-gartner/#323195ec5739. Accessed 7 Apr 2019
Alenezi, A., et al.: Experts reviews of a cloud forensic readiness framework for organizations. J. Cloud Comput. 8(1) (2019)
Siegel, R.: LabCorp discloses data breach affecting 7.7 million customers. The Washington Post, Washington, D.C., 5 June 2019
Cathay Pacific Cyber Attack Is World’s Biggest Airline Data Breach. Insurance Journal. https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2018/10/26/505699.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2018
Alsmadi, I.: Cyber Operational Planning. The NICE Cyber Security Framework, pp. 135–179 (2019)
Lin, I.-L., Yen, Y.-S., Chang, A.: A study on digital forensics standard operation procedure for wireless cybercrime. In: 2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/imis.2011.58
Shin, Y.-D.: New digital forensics investigation procedure model. In: 2008 Fourth International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ncm.2008.116
Umar, R., Riadi, I., Muthohirin, B.: Live forensics of tools on android devices for email forensics. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. 17(4), 1803–1809 (2019)
Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., Dang, H.: Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response (2006). https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-86
Al Fahdi, M., Clarke, N.L., Furnell, S.M.: Challenges to digital forensics: a survey of researchers & practitioners attitudes and opinions. In: 2013 Information Security for South Africa (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/issa.2013.6641058
Rogers, M., Goldman, J., Mislan, R., Wedge, T., Debrota, S.: Computer forensics field triage process model. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law (2006). https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2006.1004
Simou, S., Kalloniatis, C., Kavakli, E., Gritzalis, S.: Cloud forensics solutions: a review. In: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 299–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_28
Garfinkel, S.L.: Digital forensics research: the next 10 years. Digit. Investig. 7, S64–S73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2010.05.009
ISO/IEC 27050 EDiscovery. ISO27k Infosec Management Standards. https://www.iso27001security.com/html/27050.html. Accessed 17 Sept 2019
Choo, K.-K.R., Dehghantanha, A.: Contemporary digital forensics investigations of cloud and mobile applications. In: Contemporary Digital Forensic Investigations of Cloud and Mobile Applications, pp. 1–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805303-4.00001-0
Kundu, S., Garg, L.: Web log analyzer tools: a comparative study to analyze user behavior. In: 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering - Confluence (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/confluence.2017.7943117
Mivule, K., Anderson, B.: A study of usability-aware network trace anonymization. In: 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/sai.2015.7237310
Analysis cloud - running sensor data analysis programs on a cloud computing infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (2013). https://doi.org/10.5220/0004371503580365
Singh, S.K.: Cloud computing: comparative study own server vs cloud server. In: Recent Advances in Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814704830_0056
Chen, M.: Information Theory Tools for Visualization (2016). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369228
Carvey, H.: Rootkits and rootkit detection. In: Windows Forensic Analysis, pp. 307–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-159749156-3/50011-3
Rubsamen, T., Pulls, T., Reich, C.: Security and privacy preservation of evidence in cloud accountability audits. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 95–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29582-4_6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bhatia, S., Malhotra, J. (2020). CFRF: Cloud Forensic Readiness Framework – A Dependable Framework for Forensic Readiness in Cloud Computing Environment. In: Raj, J., Bashar, A., Ramson, S. (eds) Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application. ICIDCA 2019. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38040-3_88
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38040-3_88
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38039-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38040-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)