Abstract
It is a serious failure of business and management researchers when they solve the wrong problem precisely. This means that their problem formulation is inadequate which may lead to disastrous consequences for the well-being of the stakeholders. To avoid substantive failures in problem solving business and management scholars should reconsider the basic assumptions of the system under their study and include as many stakeholders’ views as possible. Appropriate problem solutions should address all the important dimensions of the problem in question (the scientific-technical, the interpersonal-social, the systemic-ecological, and the existential-spiritual), and create some optimal balance among them. The job of responsible business and management research is identifying the right problems and producing solutions for them that are substantively adequate and ethically acceptable in a broad socioeconomic context.
The paper is based on and expands further the author’s paper on “Responsible Social Science in the Age of Economic Crisis” (Human Systems Management 2014, Vol. 33, Nos. 1–2, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-140805). Permission for using the paper is granted by the Publisher. The present version of the paper has largely benefited from constructive comments by Anne Tsui, Founder of RRBM.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackoff, R. 2004. Ackoff Center Guiding Principles. Philadelphia: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Bouckaert, L. 2006. The Ethics Management Paradox. In Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics, ed. L. Zsolnai, 191–194. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bower, J.L., and L.S. Paine. 2017. The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 50–60.
Deci, E.L. 1976. The Hidden Cost of Rewards. Organizational Dynamics 4 (3): 61–72.
Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 2000. The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268.
Donaldson, T. 2012. The Epistemic Fault Line in Corporate Governance. Academy of Management Review 37 (2): 256–271.
Douglas, H. 2003. The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists. American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.
Frey, B. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Frey, B., and M. Osterloh. 2005. Yes, Managers Should Be Paid Like Bureaucrats. Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (1): 96–111.
Honig, B., J. Lampel, J.A.C. Baum, M.A. Glynn, R. Jing, M. Lounsbury, E. Schübler, D.G. Sirmon, A.S. Tsui, J.P. Walsh, and A. Van Witteloostuijn. 2018. Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis? Academy of Management Perspectives 32 (4): 412–442.
Ims, K.J., L.J. Pedersen, and L. Zsolnai. 2014. How Economic Incentives Destroy Social, Ecological and Existential Values: The Case of Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 123 (2): 353–360.
Ims, K.J., and L. Zsolnai. 2009. Holistic Problem Solving. In The Future International Manager: A Vision of the Roles and Duties of Management, ed. L. Zsolnai and A. Tencati, 116–129. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.
Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Jonas, H. 1996. Mortality and Morality: A Search for the Good After Auschwitz. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Mitroff, I. 1998. Smart Thinking for Crazy Times: The Art of Solving the Right Problems. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Mitroff, I., and A. Silvers. 2009. Dirty Rotten Strategies—How We Trick Ourselves and Others into Solving the Wrong Problems Precisely. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
RRBM. 2019. Responsible Research in Business and Management. http://rrbm.network/. Accessed 14 Apr 2019.
Shrivastava, P., L. Zsolnai, D. Wasieleski, M. Stafford-Smith, T. Walker, O. Weber, C. Krosinsky, and D. Oram. 2019. Finance and Management for the Anthropocene. Organization & Environment 32 (1): 26–40.
Stout, L. 2012. The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Verschuren, P., and L. Zsolnai. 1998. Norms, Goals and Stakeholders in Program Evaluation. Human Systems Management 17: 155–160.
Walsh, J.P., K. Weber, and J.D. Margolis. 2003. Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found. Journal of Management 29 (6): 859–881.
Zsolnai, L. 2006. Extended Stakeholder Theory. Society and Business Review 1 (1): 37–44.
Zsolnai, L., and B. Flanagan (eds.). 2019. The Routledge International Handbook of Spirituality in Society and the Professions. London and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zsolnai, L. (2020). Identifying and Solving the Right Problem by Using Multidimensional Systems Thinking. In: Zsolnai, L., Thompson, M. (eds) Responsible Research for Better Business. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37810-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37810-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37809-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37810-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)