Skip to main content

MQLV: Optimal Policy of Money Management in Retail Banking with Q-Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mining Data for Financial Applications (MIDAS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11985))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

Reinforcement learning has become one of the best approach to train a computer game emulator capable of human level performance. In a reinforcement learning approach, an optimal value function is learned across a set of actions, or decisions, that leads to a set of states giving different rewards, with the objective to maximize the overall reward. A policy assigns to each state-action pairs an expected return. We call an optimal policy a policy for which the value function is optimal. QLBS, Q-Learner in the Black-Scholes(-Merton) Worlds, applies the reinforcement learning concepts, and noticeably, the popular Q-learning algorithm, to the financial stochastic model of Black, Scholes and Merton. It is, however, specifically optimized for the geometric Brownian motion and the vanilla options. Its range of application is, therefore, limited to vanilla option pricing within the financial markets. We propose MQLV, Modified Q-Learner for the Vasicek model, a new reinforcement learning approach that determines the optimal policy of money management based on the aggregated financial transactions of the clients. It unlocks new frontiers to establish personalized credit card limits or bank loan applications, targeting the retail banking industry. MQLV extends the simulation to mean reverting stochastic diffusion processes and it uses a digital function, a Heaviside step function expressed in its discrete form, to estimate the probability of a future event such as a payment default. In our experiments, we first show the similarities between a set of historical financial transactions and Vasicek generated transactions and, then, we underline the potential of MQLV on generated Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, MQLV is the first Q-learning Vasicek-based methodology addressing transparent decision making processes in retail banking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The code and the data sets are available at https://github.com/dagrate/MQLV.

References

  1. Mnih, V., et al.: Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 (2013)

  2. Sutton, R.S.: Temporal credit assignment in reinforcement learning (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from delayed rewards. Ph.D. thesis, King’s College, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams, R.: A class of gradient-estimation algorithms for reinforcement learning in neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. II-601 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sermanet, P., Kavukcuoglu, K., Chintala, S., LeCun, Y.: Pedestrian detection with unsupervised multi-stage feature learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3626–3633 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mnih, V., et al.: Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540), 529 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Hasselt, H., Guez, A., Silver, D.: Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning. In: AAAI, Phoenix, AZ, vol. 2, p. 5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lillicrap, T.P., et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015)

  11. Halperin, I.: Qlbs: Q-learner in the black-scholes (-merton) worlds. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04609 (2017)

  12. Black, F., Scholes, M.: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 81(3), 637–654 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Merton, R.C.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 4, 141–183 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilmott, P.: Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hull, J.C.: Options Futures and Other Derivatives. Pearson Education India, Bengaluru (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vasicek, O.: An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Financ. Econ. 5(2), 177–188 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robbins, H., Monro, S.: A stochastic approximation method. In: Herbert Robbins Selected Papers, pp. 102–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hasselt, H.V.: Double q-learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2613–2621 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy, S.A.: A generalization error for Q-learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6(Jul), 1073–1097 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Santander: Santander product recommendation (2016). https://www.kaggle.com/c/santander-product-recommendation/data

  22. Tsitsiklis, J.N., Van Roy, B.: Analysis of temporal-diffference learning with function approximation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1075–1081 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baird, L.: Residual algorithms: reinforcement learning with function approximation. In: Machine Learning Proceedings 1995, pp. 30–37. Elsevier (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Deep Learning, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lange, S., Riedmiller, M.: Deep auto-encoder neural networks in reinforcement learning. In: The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bellemare, M.G., Naddaf, Y., Veness, J., Bowling, M.: The arcade learning environment: an evaluation platform for general agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 47, 253–279 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dabney, W., Ostrovski, G., Silver, D., Munos, R.: Implicit quantile networks for distributional reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06923 (2018)

  28. Bellemare, M.G., Dabney, W., Munos, R.: A distributional perspective on reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06887 (2017)

  29. WawrzyńSki, P., Tanwani, A.K.: Autonomous reinforcement learning with experience replay. Neural Netw. 41, 156–167 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silver, D., Lever, G., Heess, N., Degris, T., Wierstra, D., Riedmiller, M.: Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. In: ICML (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Balduzzi, D., Ghifary, M.: Compatible value gradients for reinforcement learning of continuous deep policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.03005 (2015)

  32. Heess, N., Wayne, G., Silver, D., Lillicrap, T., Erez, T., Tassa, Y.: Learning continuous control policies by stochastic value gradients. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2944–2952 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaston Ormazabal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Charlier, J., Ormazabal, G., State, R., Hilger, J. (2020). MQLV: Optimal Policy of Money Management in Retail Banking with Q-Learning. In: Bitetta, V., Bordino, I., Ferretti, A., Gullo, F., Pascolutti, S., Ponti, G. (eds) Mining Data for Financial Applications. MIDAS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11985. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37720-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37720-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37719-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37720-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics