Abstract
The idea that human behavior distributes more or less “normally” along the lines of a bell-shaped curve has achieved the level of common sense. However, only random events distribute normally, and the behavior of human beings is never truly random. The normal curve—as applied to human behavior, traits, and abilities of humans—is a myth, an example of scientific groupthink that distorts the meaning of educational research, leading to practices that fail to meet the needs of individuals or subgroups of students whose profiles depart from group norms. The antidote to the “tyranny of the normal curve” is for educators to shift their gaze from measures of normative tendencies to measures of variance.
Does the good of the many outweigh the good of the one? –(Spock’s mother, Star Trek IV [Nimoy, n.d.])
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allington, R. L., Johnston, P. H., & Day, J. P. (2002). Exemplary fourth-grade teachers. Language Arts, 79, 462–466.
Berliner, D. C. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America’s youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12). Date accessed: 2/17/2015 http://www.tcrecord.org/library/abstract.asp?contentid=16889
Bradley, J. V. (1968). Distribution-free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cronbach, J. L. (1970). The essentials of psychological testing. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Dudley-Marling, C. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482–489.
Dudley-Marling, C., & Gurn, A. (2010). Troubling the foundations of special education: Examining the myth of the normal curve. In C. Dudley-Marling & A. Gurn (Eds.), The myth of the normal curve (pp. 9–23). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Dunlap, K. (1935). The average animal. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 1–3.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, Pub.L. No. 114-95. (2015). Retrieved from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-114s1177enr/pdf/BILLS-114s1177enr.pdf on January 13, 2016.
Fashing, J., & Goertzel, T. (1981). The myth of the normal curve: A theoretical critique and examination of its role in teaching and research. Humanity and Society, 5(1), 14–31.
Finn, P. J. (2009). Literacy with an attitude: Educating working-class children in their own self-interest. Albany, NY: SUNY.
Geary, R. C. (1947). Testing for normality. Biometrika, 34, 209–242.
George W. Bush Institute. (2014). The global report card. Available at globalreportcard.org
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.
Hlebowitsh, P. (2012). When best practices aren’t: A Schwabian perspective on teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(1), 1–12.
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156–166.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2013). The nation’s report card. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Nimoy, L. (Director), & Nimoy, L. (Writer). (n.d.). Star trek IV – The voyage home [Video file].
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2015). PISA: Results in focus. Available at https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
Sartori, R. (2006). The bell curve in psychological research and practice: Myth or reality? Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 407–418.
Walberg, H. J., Strykowski, B. F., Rovai, E., & Hung, S. S. (1984). Exceptional performance. Review of Educational Research, 54(1), 87–112.
Wechsler, D. (1935). The range of human abilities. Baltimore, MD: William & Wilkins.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). Find what works based on the evidence. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dudley-Marling, C. (2020). The Tyranny of the Normal Curve: How the “Bell Curve” Corrupts Educational Research and Practice. In: Allen, D.M., Howell, J.W. (eds) Groupthink in Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36822-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36822-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36821-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36822-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)