Skip to main content

Study on Enhancing Learnability of a Serious Game by Implementing a Pedagogical Agent

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11899))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2717 Accesses

Abstract

This paper elaborates on a study on the implementation of a pedagogical agent. The agent is meant to improve and enhance the learnability of the serious game Lost Earth 2307. The game is analyzed in order to find the aspects that need to be improved (i.e. problems players might have with learning how to use and handle the game). Based on these findings the implementation of the pedagogical agent and the methods used are presented and elaborated. Furthermore, the question whether a pedagogical agent can improve the learnability of game mechanics in serious games compared to the “Standard form contract”-style tutorials used in Lost Earth 2307, is discussed. A study about the evaluation of the implemented pedagogical agent, its research question and the metrics used, is presented. The paper depicts the setup of the user study using SUS and NASA TLX questionnaires and report in detail about the results and discusses the outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House, St. Paul (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bopp, M.: Immersive Didaktik und Framingprozesse in Computerspielen. In: Neitzel, B., Nohr, R.F. (eds.) Das Spiel mit dem Medium. Partizipation-Immersion-Interaktion. Zur Teilhabe an den Medien von Kunst bis Computerspiel, pp. 170–186. Schüren, Marburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atorf, D., Kannegieser, E., Roller, W.: Balancing realism and engagement for a serious game in the domain of remote sensing. In: Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Söbke, H. (eds.) GALA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11385, pp. 146–156. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, M.-T., She, H.-C., Annetta, L.A.: Game immersion experience: its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31(3), 232–253 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, London (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI and Interaction Design. Pearson, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gee, J.P.: Learning by design: good video games as learning machines. E-Learn. Digit. Media 2(1), 5–16 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedges, N.: Gamasutra: hedges’s blog - video game tutorials: how do they teach? (2017). https://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/NathanHedges/20171013/307378/Video{-}Game{-}Tutorials{-}How{-}Do{-}They{-}Teach.php. Accessed 07 June 2019

  9. Johnson, W.L., Lester, J.C.: Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 25–36 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gilbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(1), 1–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Holum, A.: Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. Am. Educ. 6(11), 38–46 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raskin, J.: The Humane Interface. Addison Wesley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L., Bergendorff, K.H., Grischkowsky, N.L.: Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: evidence from questionnaires and interviews. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 1986, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 162–167. ACM (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 189–194 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cao, A., Chintamani, K.K., Pandya, A.K., Ellis, R.D.: NASA TLX: software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behav. Res. Methods 41(1), 113–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Atorf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Atorf, D., Kannegieser, E., Roller, W. (2019). Study on Enhancing Learnability of a Serious Game by Implementing a Pedagogical Agent. In: Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G., Gentile, M., Ninaus, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34350-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics