Skip to main content

Towards a Poetics of Worldlessness: Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Human Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life After Literature

Part of the book series: Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress ((NAHP,volume 12))

  • 288 Accesses

Abstract

At the heart of Hannah Arendt’s political philosophy, we find an often misunderstood central proposition: life is worldless. Through a close reading of Arendt’s The Human Condition (1958), this paper aims to unpack the complications of this proposition in order to provide a new understanding of the roles of the “world” and “worldlessness” in Arendt’s thought. Contrary to traditional interpretations, I argue that if we follow Arendt’s arguments to their logical conclusions we have to consider the possibility that both the world and meaningful human action are essentially worldless: while the world is nothing but the objectification of the difference between the worldlessness of life and the worldlessness of thought, the essence of meaningful human action will always be marked by a withdrawal from the world. This inversion of Arendt’s reflections on life, thought, world, and action, is the necessary foundation for a new engagement of the problem of worldlessness in the age of biopolitical rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a reconsideration of Arendt’s political philosophy from the perspective of contemporary discussions of biopolitics, see Diprose and Ziarek (2018).

  2. 2.

    For discussions of Arendt’s definition of the world, see Bernauer 1987; Boym 2009; Borren 2013; Oliver 2015: 71–110.

  3. 3.

    For an overview of Arendt’s critique of modernity, see Villa 1996: 171–208.

  4. 4.

    For a systematic account of Arendt’s definition of action in relation to Aristotle and Heidegger, see Villa 1996. In addition, see also Young-Bruehl 2006: 77–156; O’Byrne 2010.

  5. 5.

    For a critique of Arendt’s human essentialism from the perspective of biodiversity, see Oliver 2015: 71–110.

  6. 6.

    Arendt’s negative political judgment on monasticism is in stark contrast with Giorgio Agamben’s arguments in The Highest Poverty (Agamben 2013).

  7. 7.

    In my reading, Werner Hamacher reached a similar set of conclusions about the possibilities of being-with in Arendt’s writings (Hamacher 2017).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2013. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, transl. by Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, James William (ed.). 1987. Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borren, Marieke. 2013. ‘A Sense Of The World’: Hannah Arendt’s Hermeneutic Phenomenology Of Common Sense. International Journal Of Philosophical Studies 21 (2): 225–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boym, Svetlana. 2009. From Love to Worldliness: Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature 55: 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diprose, Rosalyn, and Ewa Plonowska Ziarek. 2018. Arendt, Natality and Biopolitics: Toward Democratic Plurality and Reproductive Justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, Werner. 2017. The One Right No One Ever Has. Philosophy Today 61 (4): 947–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. 2001. Hannah Arendt: Life is a Narrative. Transl. by Frank Collins. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, Anne. 2010. Natality and Finitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Kelly. 2015. Earth and World: Philosophy After the Apollo Mission. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Dana. 1996. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 2006. Why Arendt Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Végső .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Végső, R. (2020). Towards a Poetics of Worldlessness: Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Human Action. In: Kulcsár-Szabó, Z., Lénárt, T., Simon, A., Végső, R. (eds) Life After Literature. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33738-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics