Skip to main content

Protein Secondary Structure Graphs as Predictors for Protein Function

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Innovations 2019. Big Data Processing and Mining (ICT Innovations 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1110))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Predicting the functions of the proteins from their structure is an active area of interest. The current trends of the secondary structure representation use direct letter representation of the specific secondary structure element of every amino acid in the linear sequence. Using graph representation to represent the protein sequence provides additional information about the structural relationships within the amino acid sequence. This study outlines the protein secondary structure with a novel approach of representing the proteins using protein secondary structure graph where nodes are amino acids from the protein sequence, and the edges denote the peptide and hydrogen bonds that construct the secondary structure. The developed model for protein function prediction Structure2Function operates on these graphs with a defined variant of the present idea from deep learning on non-Euclidian graph-structure data, the Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Lazikani, B., Jung, J., Xiang, Z., Honig, B.: Protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5(1), 51–56 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altschul, S.F., et al.: Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17), 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apweiler, R., et al.: Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D115–D119 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashburner, M., et al.: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25(1), 25 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berman, H.M., et al.: The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1), 235–242 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bronstein, M.M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., Vandergheynst, P.: Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34(4), 18–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C., Huang, H., Wu, C.H.: Protein bioinformatics databases and resources. In: Wu, C.H., Arighi, C.N., Ross, K.E. (eds.) Protein Bioinformatics. MMB, vol. 1558, pp. 3–39. Springer, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6783-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, W.T., Radivojac, P.: Analysis of protein function and its prediction from amino acid sequence. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 79(7), 2086–2096 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gene Ontology Consortium: The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Suppl. 1), D258–D261 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crooks, G.E., Brenner, S.E.: Protein secondary structure: entropy, correlations and prediction. Bioinformatics 20(10), 1603–1611 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dai, H., Dai, B., Song, L.: Discriminative embeddings of latent variable models for structured data. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2702–2711 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duvenaud, D.K., et al.: Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2224–2232 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S.S., Riley, P.F., Vinyals, O., Dahl, G.E.: Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 1263–1272. JMLR. org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, Q., Jin, X., Lee, S.J., Yao, S.: Protein secondary structure prediction: a survey of the state of the art. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 76, 379–402 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, Y., et al.: An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy. Genome Biol. 17(1), 184 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kabsch, W., Sander, C.: Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12), 2577–2637 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kihara, D.: Protein Function Prediction: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson, W.R.: Protein function prediction: problems and pitfalls. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 51(1), 4–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radivojac, P., et al.: A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods 10(3), 221 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reddi, S.J., Kale, S., Kumar, S.: On the convergence of adam and beyond. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rost, B.: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134(2–3), 204–218 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, Y., et al.: Sixty-five years of the long march in protein secondary structure prediction: the final stretch? Briefings Bioinform. 19(3), 482–494 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, M., Cui, Z., Neumann, M., Chen, Y.: An end-to-end deep learning architecture for graph classification. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially financed by the Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia. The computational resources used for this research were kindly provided by MAGIX.AI and the NVIDIA Corporation (a donation of a Titan V GPU to Eftim Zdravevski).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frosina Stojanovska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stojanovska, F., Ackovska, N. (2019). Protein Secondary Structure Graphs as Predictors for Protein Function. In: Gievska, S., Madjarov, G. (eds) ICT Innovations 2019. Big Data Processing and Mining. ICT Innovations 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1110. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33110-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33110-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33109-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33110-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics