Abstract
A common narrative of cryptocurrencies presents them as “trustless,” decentralized, and autonomous systems. The “trustlessness” is meant to suggest lack of need for third-party verification in blockchain technologies, but the term has been somewhat conflated with broader connotations of “trust.” This chapter draws out that nuance, and critically assesses that claim, by emphasizing the human element of trust in cryptocurrencies across various contexts. It does so by highlighting four activities that require both direct human intervention and direct human participation, including: “hard forks” to directly change protocols, the management of cryptocurrency exchanges, the emission of ICOs, and investor recourse to traditional governance institutions including courts of law. The findings of the chapter therefore suggest that the cryptocurrency space is not “trustless” in every sense as it is still reliant on the trust-element in human agency and structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adhami S, Giudici G, Martinazzi S (2018) Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. J Econ Bus 100:64–75
Bahga A, Madisetti VK (2016) Blockchain platform for industrial internet of things. J Softw Eng Appl 9(10):533
Banafa A (2017) IoT and blockchain convergence: benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things
Benedetti H, Kostovetsky L (2018) Digital tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin offerings. Returns to investors in initial coin offerings (May 20, 2018)
Catalini C, Gans JS (2018) Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens (no. w24418). National Bureau of Economic Research
Chohan UW (2017a) Cryptocurrencies: a brief thematic review. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3024330
Chohan UW (2017b) The decentralized autonomous organization and governance issues. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3082055
Chohan UW (2017c) The double spending problem and cryptocurrencies. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3090174
Chohan UW (2017d) Initial coin offerings (ICOs): risks, regulation, and accountability. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers
Chohan UW (2017e) Cryptoanarchism and cryptocurrencies. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3079241
Chohan UW (2018a) The problems of cryptocurrency thefts and exchange shutdowns. Available via SSRN 3131702
Chohan UW (2018b) Bitconnect and cryptocurrency accountability. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3131512
Chohan UW (2018c) Oversight and regulation of cryptocurrencies: bitlicense. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3133342
Chohan UW (2019a) Are cryptocurrencies truly ‘trustless’? Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3331544
Chohan UW (2019b) The key man problem in cryptocurrencies? Case of QuadrigaCX. Notes on the 21st century. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3329573
Chohan UW (forthcoming-a) Public value and citizen-driven digital innovation. Information Polity
Chohan UW (forthcoming-b) Public value without public managers? Decentralized autonomous organizations and public administration. Information Polity
Clayton J (2017) Statement on cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings. In: Securities and exchange commission (SEC) statements. SEC, Washington, DC
Clayton J, Giancarlo JC (2018) Joint statement on cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) & Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Washington, DC
Coin Market (2019) Top cryptocurrency exchanges list. https://coin.market/exchanges. Accessed 20 April 2019
Destefanis G, Marchesi M, Ortu M, Tonelli R, Bracciali A, Hierons R (2018, March) Smart contracts vulnerabilities: a call for blockchain software engineering? In: 2018 international workshop on blockchain oriented software engineering (IWBOSE), IEEE, pp 19–25
Duhaime C (2019) From law to lawlessness: bits of the untold QuadrigaCX story. Coindesk. March 26
Fisch C (2019) Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. J Bus Ventur 34(1):1–22
Foroglou G, Tsilidou AL (2015, May) Further applications of the blockchain. In: 12th student conference on managerial science and technology
Fortune Jack (2018) Study on ICO scams in 2018. https://fortunejack.com/
Howell ST, Niessner M, Yermack D (2018) Initial coin offerings: financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales (no. w24774). National Bureau of Economic Research
Kiviat TI (2015) Beyond bitcoin: issues in regulating blockchain transactions. Duke Law J 65:569
Klems M, Eberhardt J, Tai S, Härtlein S, Buchholz S, Tidjani A (2017, November) Trustless intermediation in blockchain-based decentralized service marketplaces. In: International conference on service-oriented computing. Springer, Cham, pp 731–739
Kurtulmus AB, Daniel K (2018) Trustless machine learning contracts; evaluating and exchanging machine learning models on the ethereum blockchain. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.10185
Lee J, Li T, Shin D (2018) The wisdom of crowds and information cascades in FinTech: evidence from initial coin offerings
Marshall P (2009) Demanding the impossible: a history of anarchism. PM Press, Oakland, CA
Satis Group (2017) Study on ICO scams in 2017. http://satisgroup.io
Schaub A, Bazin R, Hasan O, Brunie L (2016, May) A trustless privacy-preserving reputation system. In: IFIP international conference on ICT systems security and privacy protection. Springer, Cham, pp 398–411
Wolff RP (1998) In defense of anarchism. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chohan, U.W. (2019). Are Cryptocurrencies Truly Trustless?. In: Goutte, S., Guesmi, K., Saadi, S. (eds) Cryptofinance and Mechanisms of Exchange. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30738-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30738-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30737-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30738-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)