Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oral Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Improving Outcomes in Oral Cancer

  • 470 Accesses

Abstract

A successful outcome in oral cancer surgery is firstly determined by adequate oncologic resection with clear margins and secondly reconstruction of the resultant defect that restores both form and function. This chapter focuses on the latter objective. Subsites of the oral cavity (lip, cheek, tongue, floor of mouth, mandible, and maxilla) are discussed according to function, morbidity, and reconstructive options, which are organized from simplest to most complex.

Arguably the greatest challenge of oral cancer surgery is reconstruction that restores the patient’s premorbid quality of life. True oral cavity malignancies, as distinguished from those arising in the oropharynx, are typically amenable to resection with acceptable oncologic outcome. However, the functional aspects of the oral cavity are among the most important in the body and are extremely sensitive to alteration resulting from even an apparently small resection. The mouth is of critical importance for both nutrition (mastication and deglutition) and social interaction (speech, facial expression), two of the most basic functions on which quality of life depends. All these functions depend on the anatomic integrity and coordinated action of organs within a very small tissue volume. Oral squamous cell carcinoma, the typical malignant pathology requiring resection from the oral cavity, is ideally resected with a 1 cm margin in all directions, more than doubling the volume resected for lesions up to 2.5 cm in diameter. Many patients present with oral malignancies of a size requiring significant resection even before these margins are applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ray E. Head and neck reconstructive surgery. In: Cancer treatment and research. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. p. 123–43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435840. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erba P, Ogawa R, Vyas R, Orgill DP. The reconstructive matrix: a new paradigm in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Marakby HH. The reliability of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2006;18(1):41–50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1723785. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah JP, Haribhakti V, Loree TR, Sutaria P. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1990;160(4):352–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zitelli JA. Wound healing by secondary intention. A cosmetic appraisal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9(3):407–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leonard AL, Hanke CW. Second intention healing for intermediate and large postsurgical defects of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(5):832–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin X, Teng L, Zhang C, Xu J, Lu J, Zhang B, et al. Reconstruction of partial-thickness vermilion defects with a mucosal V–Y advancement flap based on the orbicularis oris muscle. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2011;64(4):472–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner DJD, Newman DMH. Bipedicled axial cross-lip flap for correction of major vermilion deficiency after cleft lip repair. 2017. https://doi.org/101597/1545-1569_1994_031_0148_baclff_23.co_2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ceran C, Demirseren ME, Sarici M, Durgun M, Tekin F. Tongue flap as a reconstructive option in intraoral defects. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(3):972–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levi B, Ricci JA, Donelan MB. Vermillion reconstruction with anal verge transitional epithelium. J Burn Care Res. 2017;39(2):1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karapandzic M. Reconstruction of lip defects by local arterial flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1974;27(1):93–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4593704. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sood A, Paik A, Lee E. Lower lip reconstruction: karapandzic flap. Eplasty 2013;13:ic17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409208. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

  13. Bernard C. Cancer de la levre inferieure opere par un procede nouveau. Bull Mem Soc Chir. 1853;3:357–64. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10011662354/#cit.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webster RC, Coffey RJ, Kelleher RE. Total and partial reconstruction of the lower lip with innervated muscle-bearing flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;25(3):360–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pirgousis P, Fernandes R. Reconstruction of subtotal defects of the lower lip: a review of current techniques and a proposed modification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(1):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujimori R. Gate for the total reconstruction of the lower lip. Br J Plast Surg. 1980;33(3):340–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7426811. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aytekin A, Ay A, Aytekin O. Total upper lip reconstruction with bilateral fujimori gate flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):797–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Agostini T. The Sabattini-Abbé flap: a historical note. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2):767. https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-200902000-00051. Accessed 3 Sep 2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abbe R. A new plastic operation for the relief of deformity due to double harelip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(5):481–3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4880838. Accessed 31 Aug 2018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster JP. Crescentic peri-alar cheek excision for upper lip flap advancement with a short history of upper lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;16(6):434–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandes R, Clemow J. Outcomes of total or near-total lip reconstruction with microvascular tissue transfer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(12):2899–906. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027823911200359X. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakai S, Soeda S, Endo T, Ishii M, Uchiumi E. A compound radial artery forearm flap for the reconstruction of lip and chin defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42(3):337–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cordova A, D’Arpa S, Moschella F. Gracilis free muscle transfer for morpho-functional reconstruction of the lower lip. Head Neck. 2008;30(5):684–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17979111. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sacak B, Gurunluoglu R. The innervated gracilis muscle for microsurgical functional lip reconstruction: review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(2):204–9. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000637-201502000-00015. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurunluoglu R, Glasgow M, Williams SA, Gurunluoglu A, Antrobus J, Eusterman V. Functional reconstruction of total lower lip defects using innervated gracilis flap in the setting of high-energy ballistic injury to the lower face: preliminary report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(10):1335–42. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1748681512002471. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons GB, Milroy BC, Lendvay PG, Teston LM. Upper lip reconstruction: use of the free superficial temporal artery hair-bearing flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42(3):333–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2758210. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang K-P, Lai C-S, Tsai C-C, Lin T-M, Lin S-D. Total upper lip reconstruction with a free temporal scalp flap: long-term follow-up. Head Neck. 2003;25(7):602–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12808664. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dean A, Alamillos F, García-López A, Sánchez J, Peñalba M. The buccal fat pad flap in oral reconstruction. Head Neck. 2001;23(5):383–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11295812. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu F, Wang L, Pang S, Kan Q. Reconstruction of full-thickness buccal defects with folded radial forearm flaps: a retrospective clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(32):e7344. http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005792-201708110-00002. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Z-M, Wu D, Liu X-K, Liu W-W, Li H, Li Q, et al. Reconstruction of through-and-through cheek defects with folded free anterolateral thigh flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(5):960–4. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027823911201573X. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu YM, Sherris DA. Static procedures for the management of the midface and lower face. Facial Plast Surg. 2008;24(2):211–5. http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2008-1075836. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Coyle M, Godden A, Brennan PA, Cascarini L, Coombes D, Kerawala C, et al. Dynamic reanimation for facial palsy: an overview. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):679–83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435613000107?via%3Dihub. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin D, Pascal JF, Baudet J, Mondie JM, Farhat JB, Athoum A, et al. The submental island flap: a new donor site. Anatomy and clinical applications as a free or pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(5):867–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cariati P, Cabello Serrano A, Marin Fernandez AB, Perez de Perceval Tara M, Juliá MA, Ildefonso Martinez Lara M. Is submental flap safe for the oncological reconstruction of the oral cavity? J Stomatol oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468785518301307. Accessed 29 Aug 2018.

  35. Howard BE, Nagel TH, Donald CB, Hinni ML, Hayden RE. Oncologic safety of the submental flap for reconstruction in oral cavity malignancies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(4):558–62. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599814520687. Accessed 29 Aug 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu Y, Tang P, Qi Y, Xu Z, He Y. Evaluation for submental island flap. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002;37(6):418–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12641952. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Taghinia AH, Movassaghi K, Wang AX, Pribaz JJ. Reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract with the submental artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2):562–70. https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-200902000-00016. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deganello A, Manciocco V, Dolivet G, Leemans CR, Spriano G. Infrahyoid fascio-myocutaneous flap as an alternative to free radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2007;29(3):285–91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17230563. Accessed 3 Sep 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mosier K, Liu W-C, Behin B, Lee C, Baredes S. Cortical adaptation following partial glossectomy with primary closure: implications for reconstruction of the oral tongue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(9):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown L, Rieger JM, Harris J, Seikaly H. A longitudinal study of functional outcomes after surgical resection and microvascular reconstruction for oral cancer: tongue mobility and swallowing function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(11):2690–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Biglioli F, Liviero F, Frigerio A, Rezzonico A, Brusati R. Function of the sensate free forearm flap after partial glossectomy. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2006;34(6):332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kimata Y, Sakuraba M, Hishinuma S, Ebihara S, Hayashi R, Asakage T, et al. Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(5):905–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weber RS, Ohlms L, Bowman J, Jacob R, Goepfert H. Functional results after total or near total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1991;117(5):512–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brown JS, Barry C, Ho M, Shaw R. A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):e23–30. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204515003101. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M. A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 2000;22(1):17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Moreno MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanna EY, Hanasono MM. Microvascular free flap reconstruction versus palatal obturation for maxillectomy defects. Head Neck. 2009;32(7):860–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA

    J. Collin, B. Turner & R. Fernandes

Authors
  1. J. Collin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Fernandes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, North Memorial Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Deepak Kademani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Collin, J., Turner, B., Fernandes, R. (2020). Oral Reconstruction. In: Kademani, D. (eds) Improving Outcomes in Oral Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30094-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30094-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30093-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30094-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation