Abstract
Local search is widely used to solve combinatorial optimisation problems and to model biological evolution, but the performance of local search algorithms on different kinds of fitness landscapes is poorly understood. Here we introduce a natural approach to modelling fitness landscapes using valued constraints. This allows us to investigate minimal representations (normal forms) and to consider the effects of the structure of the constraint graph on the tractability of local search. First, we show that for fitness landscapes representable by binary Boolean valued constraints there is a minimal necessary constraint graph that can be easily computed. Second, we consider landscapes as equivalent if they allow the same (improving) local search moves; we show that a minimal normal form still exists, but is NP-hard to compute. Next we consider the complexity of local search on fitness landscapes modelled by valued constraints with restricted forms of constraint graph. In the binary Boolean case, we prove that a tree-structured constraint graph gives a tight quadratic bound on the number of improving moves made by any local search; hence, any landscape that can be represented by such a model will be tractable for local search. We build two families of examples to show that both the conditions in our tractability result are essential. With domain size three, even just a path of binary constraints can model a landscape with an exponentially long sequence of improving moves. With a treewidth two constraint graph, even with a maximum degree of three, binary Boolean constraints can model a landscape with an exponentially long sequence of improving moves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaronson, S.: Lower bounds for local search by quantum arguments. SIAM J. Comput. 35(4), 804–824 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539704447237
Carbonnel, C., Romero, M., Zivny, S.: The complexity of general-valued CSPs seen from the other side. In: 59th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2018, Paris, France, 7–9 October 2018, pp. 236–246 (2018)
Chapdelaine, P., Creignou, N.: The complexity of Boolean constraint satisfaction local search problems. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 43(1–4), 51–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-004-9419-y
Cohen, D.A., Cooper, M.C., Creed, P., Jeavons, P.G., Zivny, S.: An algebraic theory of complexity for discrete optimization. SIAM J. Comput. 42(5), 1915–1939 (2013)
Cooper, M.C., De Givry, S., Schiex, T.: Optimal soft arc consistency. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, pp. 68–73 (2007)
Crona, K., Greene, D., Barlow, M.: The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 317, 1–10 (2013)
de Visser, J., Park, S., Krug, J.: Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. Am. Nat. 174, S15–S30 (2009)
Färnqvist, T.: Constraint optimization problems and bounded tree-width revisited. In: Beldiceanu, N., Jussien, N., Pinson, É. (eds.) CPAIOR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7298, pp. 163–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29828-8_11
Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, San Francisco (1979)
Johnson, D., Papadimitriou, C., Yannakakis, M.: How easy is local search? J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 37, 79–100 (1988)
Kaznatcheev, A.: Computational complexity as an ultimate constraint on evolution. Genetics 212(1), 245–265 (2019)
Kolmogorov, V., Zivny, S.: The complexity of conservative valued CSPs. J. ACM 60(2), 10:1–10:38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2450142.2450146
Llewellyn, D.C., Tovey, C.A., Trick, M.A.: Local optimization on graphs. Discrete Appl. Math. 23(2), 157–178 (1989)
Malan, K.M., Engelbrecht, A.P.: A survey of techniques for characterising fitness landscapes and some possible ways forward. Inf. Sci. 241, 148–163 (2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025513003125
Monien, B., Tscheuschner, T.: On the power of nodes of degree four in the local max-cut problem. In: Calamoneri, T., Diaz, J. (eds.) CIAC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6078, pp. 264–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13073-1_24
Ochoa, G., Veerapen, N.: Mapping the global structure of TSP fitness landscapes. J. Heuristics 24(3), 265–294 (2018)
Poelwijk, F., Kiviet, D., Weinreich, D., Tans, S.: Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445, 383–386 (2007)
Poelwijk, F., Sorin, T.N., Kiviet, D., Tans, S.: Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 272, 141–144 (2011)
Schaffer, A., Yannakakis, M.: Simple local search problems that are hard to solve. SIAM J. Comput. 20(1), 56–87 (1991)
Tayarani-Najaran, M., Prügel-Bennett, A.: On the landscape of combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(3), 420–434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281502
Thapper, J., Zivny, S.: Necessary conditions for tractability of valued CSPs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 29(4), 2361–2384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1137/140990346
Thapper, J., Zivny, S.: The complexity of finite-valued CSPs. J. ACM 63(4), 37:1–37:33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2974019
Wright, S.: The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, pp. 355–366 (1932)
Acknowledgments
David A. Cohen was supported by Leverhulme Trust Grant RPG-2018-161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kaznatcheev, A., Cohen, D.A., Jeavons, P.G. (2019). Representing Fitness Landscapes by Valued Constraints to Understand the Complexity of Local Search. In: Schiex, T., de Givry, S. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11802. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30047-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30048-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)