Skip to main content

Introduction and Historical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anophthalmia
  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

The history of the management of blind, painful, and traumatized eyes and anophthalmia began with the oldest civilizations in the world and unfolded along with the history of humanity. Physicians in ancient times recognized the devastation and disfigurement that came with the loss of an eye. Various decorations and prostheses were made to cover the unwanted deformity and to help individuals maintain their social status in the community. As early as the 1500s, surgeons were relentlessly exploring new techniques to safely remove the globe and preserve an acceptable postoperative appearance. The progress made included a better understanding of orbital anatomy, the use of orbital implants and conformers, and the development of aesthetically appealing ocular prostheses. With the advent of anesthetic gases and antibiotics, surgeons routinely began performing eye removal operations, often to prevent the contralateral eye from developing sympathetic ophthalmia after trauma. Different surgical techniques to remove the whole globe (enucleation) and to remove only the intraocular contents (evisceration) were explored. A controversy over the selection of enucleation versus evisceration began and has been debated for more than a century. Because of the risk of sympathetic ophthalmia and inadvertent orbital spreading of intraocular melanomas following evisceration, this procedure was nearly abandoned by the early 1900s but has recently become much more widely used. Glass artificial eyes (ocular prostheses) were developed in Germany but became scarce after the beginning of World War II, when commercial trade with Germany was halted. Ocularists in the United States and the United Kingdom subsequently found alternative prosthetic materials, including acrylic, and techniques, such as socket impressions, to improve the fabrication of artificial eyes. The fundamental steps in modern-day eye removal surgery are not much different from those performed a hundred years ago. This chapter briefly summarizes the story of eye removal and management of anophthalmia throughout human history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Luce CM. A short history of enucleation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970;10(4):681–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wheeler JR. History of ophthalmology through the ages. Br J Ophthalmol. 1946;30(5):264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moghadasi AN. Artificial eye in Burnt City and theoretical understanding of how vision works. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(11):1595. Copyrighted image reproduced with permission.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Farrokh K. The world’s oldest known artificial eye [Internet]. Kaveh Farrokh. 2006 [cited 2018 Aug 28]. Available from: http://kavehfarrokh.com/iranica/maps-of-iran-5000-bc-651-ad/the-worlds-oldest-known-artificial-eye/.

  5. Sami D, Young S, Petersen R. Perspective on orbital enucleation implants. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(3):244–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvano CJ. Smith and Nesi’s ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelley JJ. History of ocular prostheses. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970;10(4):713–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beer GJ. Geschichte der Augenkunde überhaupt und der Augenheilkunde insbesondere: Eine Einladungs-Schrift zur Eröffnung d. Clinic für d. Augenkrankheiten. V. Haykul; 1813.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ. Clinical ocular prosthetics. New York: Springer; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Espy JW. Cosmetic scleral contact lenses and shells. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66(1):95–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajjad A. Ocular prosthesis-a simulation of human anatomy: a literature review. Cureus. 2012;4(12):e74. Permission granted by the author and publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruedemann AD. Plastic eye implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1946;29(8):947–52. Copyrighted image reproduced with permission under license number 4425650517351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1976;10:689–711.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman AE. The retracted eye socket. Am J Ophthalmol. 1952;35(1):89–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes OH. Incorporating gold into ocular prosthetics. J Ophthalmic Prosthet. 2010;15:31–43. Author’s personal collection. Permission granted by the author.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shastid TH. History of ophthalmology. In: The American encyclopedia and dictionary of ophthalmology, vol. 11. Chicago: Cleveland Press; 1917. p. 8524–904.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snyder C. An operation designated the extirpation of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74(3):429–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes MO. Eye injuries and prosthetic restoration in the American Civil War years. J Ophthalmic Prosthet. 2008;13:17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harlan GC. Article IV. Am J Med Sci (1827–1924). 1879;(154):383.

    Google Scholar 

  20. King JH Jr, Wadsworth JAC. An atlas of ophthalmic surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mules P. Evisceration of the globe with artificial vitreous. Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1885;5:200–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burch FE. Evisceration of the globe with scleral implant and preservation of the cornea. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1939;37:272.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Berens C, Carter GZ, Breakey AS. Evisceration: experience with a steel-mesh capped hollow plastic implant. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1956;54:337.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Frost WA. What is the best method of dealing with a lost eye? BMJ. 1887;2013:1153–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Migliori ME. Enucleation versus evisceration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13(5):298–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruedemann AD Jr. Sympathetic ophthalmia after evisceration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1963;61:274.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Du Toit N. Evisceration and sympathetic ophthalmia: is there a risk? University of Cape Town [dissertation]. [Riga, Lavita]: Lambert Academy Publishing; 2009. [cited 2018 Oct 13]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1096/7415a8d87123d0716494d53d681c7eca969b.pdf.

  28. Hansen AB, Petersen C, Heegaard S, Prause JU. Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations, changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77(3):331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saeed MU, Chang BY, Khandwala M, Shivane AG, Chakrabarty A. Twenty year review of histopathological findings in enucleated/eviscerated eyes. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(2):153–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasmussen ML, Prause JU, Johnson M, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Toft PB. Review of 345 eye amputations carried out in the period 1996–2003, at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(2):218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Walter WI. Update on enucleation and evisceration surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;1:243–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Levine MR, Pou CR, Lash RH. The 1998 Wendell Hughes Lecture. Evisceration: is sympathetic ophthalmia a concern in the new millennium? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;15(1):4–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kilmartin DJ, D DICK AN, Forrester JV. Sympathetic ophthalmia risk following vitrectomy: should we counsel patients? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(5):448–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kilmartin DJ, Dick AD, Forrester JV. Prospective surveillance of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(3):259–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozbek Z, Arikan G, Yaman A, Oner H, Bajin MS, Saatci AO. Sympathetic ophthalmia following vitreoretinal surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(2):221–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Du Toit N, Motala MI, Richards J, Murray AD, Maitra S. The risk of sympathetic ophthalmia following evisceration for penetrating eye injuries at Groote Schuur Hospital. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:61–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Freidlin J, Pak J, Tessler HH, Putterman AM, Goldstein DA. Sympathetic ophthalmia after injury in the Iraq War. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(2):133–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Griepentrog GJ, Lucarelli MJ, Albert DM, Nork TM. Sympathetic ophthalmia following evisceration: a rare case. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(4):316–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Androudi S, Theodoridou A, Praidou A, Brazitikos PD. Sympathetic ophthalmia following postoperative endophthalmitis and evisceration. Hippokratia. 2010;14(2):131–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Zhang MN, Jiang CH, Yao Y. Development of sympathetic ophthalmia following globe injury. Chin Med J. 2009;122(24):2961–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Buller AJ, Doris JP, Bonshek R, Brahma AK, Jones NP. Sympathetic ophthalmia following severe fungal keratitis. Eye. 2006;20(11):1306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kita Y, Yabe H, Shikishima K, Takahashi K. A case of malignant melanoma occurring 63 years after evisceration. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;105(1):52–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwartz GP, Schwartz LW. Acute angle closure glaucoma secondary to a choroidal melanoma. Eye Contact Lens. 2002;28(2):77–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Akaishi PM, Kitagawa VM, Chahud F, Cruz AA. Malignant melanoma in anophthalmic socket post-evisceration: case reports and literature review. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2004;67(6):969–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Eagle RC, Grossniklaus HE, Syed N, Hogan RN, Lloyd WC, Folberg R. Inadvertent evisceration of eyes containing uveal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):141–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bembridge BA, McMillan J. Malignant melanoma occurring after evisceration. Br J Ophthalmol. 1953;37(2):109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Moro F, Ruffato C. Malignant melanoma of the choroid of long duration; orbital evisceration 19 years after diagnosis. Boll Ocul. 1952;31(11):661.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith B, Soll DB. Malignant melanoma of choroid: report of a case discovered after evisceration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;50(2):330–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Makley TA, Teed RW. Unsuspected intraocular malignant melanomas. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;60(3):475–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Frezzotti R, Bonanni R, Nuti A, Polito E. Radical orbital resections. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;9:175–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kademani D, Tiwana P. Atlas of oral and maxillofacial surgery. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobson WH. Some points of practical importance in the operative treatment of rodent ulcer. Ann Surg. 1888;8(2):101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Noyes HD. A text-book on diseases of the eye. New York: William Wood & Company; 1890. p. 502.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Golovine SS. Orbito-sinus exenteration. Ann Ocul. 1909;141:413–31.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mouriaux F, Barraco P, Patenôtre P, Pellerin P. L’exentération orbitaire. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Davis JS. Plastic surgery: its principles and practice. Philadelphia: Blakiston; 1919. p. 381–3. Public domain.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Beare R. Surgery of the orbital region: flap repair following exenteration of the orbit. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62:1087–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ameer F, Singh AK, Kumar S. Evolution of instruments for harvest of the skin grafts. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. McLaren LR. Primary skin grafting after exenteration of the orbit. Br J Plast Surg. 1958;11:57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(1):73–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Reese AB. Exenteration of the orbit: with transplantation of the temporalis muscle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958;45(3):386–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Kwan Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Park, J.K., Johnson, T.E. (2020). Introduction and Historical Perspectives. In: Johnson, T. (eds) Anophthalmia . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29753-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29753-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29752-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29753-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics