Abstract
In this chapter, I challenge the functionalist view of informal science education and instead, through “a lens of multiples,” attend to youths’ diverse forms of meaning making of science and self in science; and how these processes are charged by and grounded in placemaking (entanglement of feelings with materials, bodies, and multiple ways of knowing, being, and becoming in STEM). I do so through two case studies, first, a video production project in ArtScience, a club that is part of a Saturday school that reaches out to elementary school level children and families with histories of recent immigration; and second, a joint video project about a girls-only afterschool program by now young women of color who no longer participate in that program. I show how the two projects took for granted the heterogeneity of forms of engagement with science and identities as insiders to science and thereby became critical sites of critique and transformation of informal science education and visions of who can do and be in science, mediated in part also by the researcher who as a collaborator contributed to that transformation. As such, the chapter challenges visions of colored youth as disposable through a discourse on multiples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2014). Long-term participants. A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation and persistence. Afterschool Matters, pp. 13–20.
Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
de Block, L., & Buckingham, D. (2007). Global children, global media: Migration, media and childhood. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 881–895.
Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2016). Affective dimensions of participatory design research in informal learning environments: Placemaking, belonging, and correspondence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 250–258.
Fettes, M., & Judson, G. (2010). Imagination and the cognitive tools of place-making. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2), 123–135.
Furman, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Capturing urban student voices in the creation of a science mini-documentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 667–694.
Giroux, H. A. (2012). Disposable youth: Racialized memories and the culture of cruelty. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gonsalves, A., Rahm, J., & Carvalho, A. (2013). “We could think of things that could be science”: Girls’ refiguring of science and self in an out-of-school-time club. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1068–1097.
Halverson, E. R. (2010). Film as identity exploration: A multimodal analysis of youth-produced films. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2352–2378.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kress, G. (2012). Recognizing learning: A perspective from a social semiotic theory of multimodality. In I. de Saint-Georges & J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality (pp. 119–140). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Lamarre, P. (2013). Catching “Montréal on the move” and challenging the discourse of unilingualism in Québec. Anthropologica, 55(1), 41–56.
Linds, W., Goulet, L., Episkenew, J.-A., Schmidt, K., Ritenburg, H., & Whiteman, A. (2015). Sharing the talking stones: Theatre of the oppressed workshops as collaborative arts-based health research with indigenous youth. In D. Conrad & A. Sinner (Eds.), Creating together: participatory, community-based, and collaborative arts practices and scholarship across Canada (pp. 3–19). Laurier: Waterloo, ON.
Luttrell, W. (2010). ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: A lens for analysing children’s visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–237.
Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotion. In G. Wells & Claxton, G. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46-58). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
McKenzie, M., & Bieler, A. (2016). Critical education and sociomaterial practice. Narration, place, and the social. New York, NY: Lang.
Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Nasir, N. S., & de Roystone, K. (2013). Power, identity, and mathematical practices outside and inside school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 264–287.
Rogers, T., & Schofield, A. (2005). Things thicker than words: Portraits of youth multiple literacies in an alternative secondary program. In J. Anderson, M. Kendrick, T. Rogers, & S. Smythe (Eds.), Portraits of literacy across families, communities and schools (pp. 205–220). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rogers, T., Winters, K.-L., LaMonde, A.-M., & Perry, M. (2010). From image to ideology: Analysing shifting identity positions of marginalized youth across the cultural sites of video production. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(4), 298–312.
Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogenity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357.
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.
Vossoughi, S., & Escudé, M. (2016). What does the camera communicate? An inquiry into the politics and possibilities of video research on learning. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12134
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahm, J. (2019). Moving Beyond the Singular: A Deconstruction of Educational Opportunity in Science Through the Lens of Multiples in an Era Marked by Globalization and Neoliberalism. In: Sengupta, P., Shanahan, MC., Kim, B. (eds) Critical, Transdisciplinary and Embodied Approaches in STEM Education. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29489-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29489-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29488-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29489-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)