Skip to main content

Introduction to Atmospheric Rivers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atmospheric Rivers

Abstract

This chapter offers a brief overview of the science of atmospheric rivers (ARs), including the process that led to their formal definition, which now appears in the Glossary of Meteorology. From the 1970s through today, the emergence of the concept of the AR follows the trajectory of many scientific ideas in varied disciplines; observations of the physical characteristics of certain phenomena lead to gradual refinements in theory as the community grapples with the topic and aggregates shared scholarship. For this particular concept—the AR—evolving technology has played a huge role: from field campaigns conducted via specially equipped jets, the advent of satellites capable of returning specialized images and data sets from around the world, and the development of atmospheric reanalysis products based on advanced data assimilation methods using a wide and comprehensive set of in situ and satellite observations. Increasingly, these tools have enabled research to progress, and that research has in turn enabled findings to be applied to specific situations and problems. For example, ARs can be both highly beneficial (precipitation for water supply) and highly destructive (flooding and other emergencies caused by extreme weather). How ARs will affect a given region or situation depends in large part upon how accurately—and how far in advance—they can be predicted and planned for. Looking forward, a scale for AR intensity and an impact-based categorization scheme have just been developed. These and further iterative improvements that enable increasing precision and accuracy are necessary as studies increasingly address ARs and global climate change. ARs are extremely important parts of our current meteorology, climatology, and hydrology; they will likely become even more pronounced parts of the climate system in the warming climate of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the fields of forecasting and prediction, “skill” is any measure of the accuracy and/or degree of association of prediction to an observation or estimate of the actual value of what is being predicted.

  2. 2.

    One of the nine national centers of the NOAA-backed National Weather Service; known since 2013 as the Weather Prediction Center (WPC), but still called “Hydro-Met” by long-time weather scientists.

References

  • Browning KA (1980) Structure, mechanism and prediction of orographically enhanced rain in Britain. In: Hide H, White PW (eds) Orographic effects in planetary flows. WMO GARP Publications Series No. 23, pp 85–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning KA, Pardoe CW (1973) Structure of low level jet streams ahead of mid-latitude cold fronts. Q J Roy Meteorolog Soc 99(422):619–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709943304

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson TN (1980) Airflow through mid-latitude cyclones and the common cloud patterns. Mon Wea Rev 108:1498–1509. (Figure 9?)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • DeFlorio MJ, Waliser DE, Guan B et al (2018) Global Assessment of Atmospheric River Prediction Skill. J Hydrometeor 19:409–426. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0135.1

  • DeFlorio MJ, Waliser DE, Guan B et al (2019) Global evaluation of atmospheric river subseasonal prediction skill. Clim Dyn 52:3039–3060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4309-x

  • Dettinger MD, Ralph FM, Das T (2011) Atmospheric rivers, floods and the water resources of California (special issue: Managing water resources and development in a changing climate). Water 3(2):445–478. https://doi.org/10.3390/w3020445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan G, Molotch NP, Waliser DF et al (2013) The 2010/2011 snow season in California’s Sierra Nevada: role of atmospheric rivers and modes of large-scale variability. Water Resour Res 49(10):6731–6743. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20537

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CP, Dettinger MD (2017) Flood runoff in relation to water vapor transport by atmospheric rivers over the Western United States, 1949–2015. Geophys Res Lett 44:11456–11462. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075399

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel KE, Karl TR, Easterling DR et al (2013) Probable maximum precipitation and climate change. Geophys Res Lett 40:1402–1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.5033

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavers DA, Ralph FM, Waliser DE et al (2015) Climate change intensification of horizontal water vapor transport in CMIP5. Geophys Res Lett 42:5617–5625. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064672

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Morss RE, Ralph FM (2007) Use of information by national weather service forecasters and emergency managers during CALJET and PACJET-2001. Wea Forecast 22:539–555. https://doi.org/10.1175/Waf1001.1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BJ, Neiman PJ, Ralph FM et al (2012) Physical processes associated with heavy flooding rainfall in Nashville, Tennessee, and vicinity during 1–2 May 2010: the role of an atmospheric river and mesoscale convective systems. MonWea Rev 140(2):358–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi KM, Barnes EA, Ralph FM et al (2018) An assessment of numerical weather prediction model re-forecasts of the occurrence, intensity, and location of atmospheric rivers along the west coast of North America. J Hydrometeorol 146:3343–3362

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman PJ, Ralph FM, Wick GA et al (2008) Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the west coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations. J Hydrometeorol 9(1):22–47. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM855.1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell RE, Newell NE, Yong Z et al (1992) Tropospheric rivers? – a pilot study. Geophys Res Lett 19(24):2401–2404. https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL02916

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Paltan H, Waliser D, Lim W–H et al (2017) Global floods and water availability driven by atmospheric rivers. Geophys Res Lett44(20):10387–10395. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074882

  • Ralph FM, Dettinger MD (2012) Historical and national perspectives on extreme west-coast precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers during December 2010. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(6):783–790. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS0D-11-001881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Wick GA (2004) Satellite and CALJET aircraft observations of atmospheric rivers over the eastern North Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98. Mon Wea Rev 132(7):1721–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Rotunno R (2005) Dropsonde observations in low-level jets over the northeastern Pacific Ocean from CALJET-1998 and PACJET-2001: mean vertical-profile and atmospheric-river characteristics. Mon Wea Rev 133:889–910. https://doi.org/10.1175/MRW2896.1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Wick GA et al (2006) Flooding on California’s Russian River: role of atmospheric rivers. Geophys Res Lett 33(13):L13801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GLO26689

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Kiladis GM et al (2010) A multiscale observational case study of a Pacific atmospheric river exhibiting tropical– extratropical connections and a mesoscale frontal wave. Mon Wea Rev 139(4):1169–1189. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3596.1

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Kiladis GN et al (2011) A multiscale observational case study of a Pacific atmospheric river exhibiting tropical–extratropical connections and a mesoscale frontal wave. Mon Wea Rev 139(4):1169–1189. https://doi.org/0.1175/2010MWR3596.1

  • Ralph FM, Coleman T, Neiman PJ et al (2013) Observed impacts of duration and seasonality of atmospheric-river landfalls on soil moisture and runoff in coastal northern California. J Hydrometeor 14(2):443–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Dettinger M, White A et al (2014) A vision for future observations for Western U.S. extreme precipitation and flooding. Special Issue of J. Contemporary Water Resources Research and Education, Universities Council for Water Resources, 153:16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Dettinger M, Lavers D et al (2017) Atmospheric Rivers Emerge as a Global Science and Applications Focus. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 1969–1973, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0262.1

  • Ralph FM, Dettinger MD, Cairns MM et al (2018) Defining “atmospheric river”: how the Glossary of Meteorology helped resolve a debate. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 99(4):837–839. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0157.1

  • Ralph FM, Rutz JJ, Cordeira JM et al (2019) A scale to characterize the strength and impacts of atmospheric rivers. Bull Am Met Soc 100(2):269–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz JJ, Steenburgh WJ, Ralph FM (2014) Climatological characteristics of atmospheric rivers and their inland penetration over the western United States. Mon Weather Rev 42(2):905–921. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00168.1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl A, Forster C, Sodemann H et al (2008) Remote sources of water vapor forming precipitation on the Norwegian west coast at 60°N—a tale of hurricanes and an atmospheric river. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D5):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernli JH (1995) Lagrangian perspective of extratropical cyclogenesis. Dissertation No. 11016. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich. 157 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernli H (1997) A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. II: a detailed case-study. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 123(1):1677–1706

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wernli H, Davies HC (1997) A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: the method and some applications. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 123:467–489

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • White AB, Anderson AL, Dettinger MD et al (2013) A twenty-first-century California observing network for monitoring extreme weather events. J Atmos Ocean Technol 30(8):1585–1603. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00217.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wick GA, Neiman PJ, Ralph FM et al (2013) Evaluation of forecasts of the water vapor signature of atmospheric rivers in operational numerical weather prediction models. Weather Forecast 28(6):1337–1352. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00025.1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Newell R (1998) A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers. Mon Wea Rev 126(3):725–735. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0725:APAFMF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Dettinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ralph, F.M., Dettinger, M.D., Schick, L.J., Anderson, M.L. (2020). Introduction to Atmospheric Rivers. In: Ralph, F., Dettinger, M., Rutz, J., Waliser, D. (eds) Atmospheric Rivers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics