Skip to main content

Social Sampling, Perceptions of Wealth Distribution, and Support for Redistribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Psychology of Inequality

Abstract

Much theorizing in social psychology, economics, and related disciplines has emphasized the role of ideology, self-interest, or other motivational factors in determining how individuals respond to economic inequality. In the present chapter, we outline a complimentary, “bottom-up” approach focusing instead on the role of environmental structure – the structure of wealth distribution itself – in tandem with individuals’ own wealth, in systematically determining perceptions of wealth distribution. This social sampling account entails that, because people are overexposed to similarly wealthy (or poor) others via their day-to-day social environment and extrapolate from these “social samples” to wider society, wealthier persons are prone to perceive greater levels of wealth across society as a whole. This process not only leads to divergence between wealthier and poorer persons’ perceptions of wealth distribution but has important knock-on consequences for their political preferences. We discuss recent evidence showing that social sampling partially explains why wealthier persons tend to favor wealth redistribution less than poorer persons, independently of self-interested or ideological motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review, 95, 960–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 897–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1994). The political economy of growth: A critical survey of the recent literature. The World Bank Economic Review, 8, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40, 1203–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 22, 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. (1992). Economic theory and the welfare state: A survey and interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 741–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. C., Kraus, M. W., & Rheinschmidt-Same, M. (2017). Cultural expressions of social class and their implications for group-related beliefs and behaviors. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23, 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M. (2013). Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European Countries. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America. Psychological Science, 25, 613–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2249–2258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. (SDN/15/13). Retrieved from International Monetary Fund website: https://www.imf.org/~/media/Websites/IMF/Imported/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/_sdn1513pdf

  • Davis, J. A. (1956). Status symbols and the measurement of status perception. Sociometry, 19, 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawtry, R. J., Sutton, R. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: From social sampling to attitudes to redistribution. Psychological Science, 26, 1389–1400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. V., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Movin’ on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (2006). Taking the interface between mind and environment seriously. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 3–29). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F., Nowak, M. A., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). The evolution of homophily. Scientific Reports, 2, 845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galesic, M., de Bruin, W. B., Dumas, M., Kapteyn, A., Darling, J. E., & Meijer, E. (2018). Asking about social circles improves election predictions. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galesic, M., Olsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2012). Social sampling explains apparent biases in judgments of social environments. Psychological Science, 23, 1515–1523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galesic, M., Olsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2018). A sampling model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 125, 363–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., Ge, F., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics and Politics, 30, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 764–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 115–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L., & McCall, L. (2007). Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 35–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J., & Smith, E. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20, 99–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 422–435.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18, 18–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupu, N., & Pontusson, J. (2011). The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review, 105, 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The communist manifesto (S. Moore, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1848).

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Fischer, M. J., Dickens, W. T., & Levy, F. (2003). The geography of inequality in the United States, 1950–2000. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2013). The undeserving rich: American beliefs about inequality, opportunity, and redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. The Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordonez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 629–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. (1985). Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence. American Sociological Review, 50, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehues, J. (2014). Subjective perceptions of inequality and redistributive preferences: An international comparison. IW Trends discussion paper. Retrieved from: http://www.relooney.com/NS3040/000_New_1519.pdf

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Kunda, Z. (1985). Perception of social distributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 297–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why income inequality keeps rising. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/dividedwestandwhyinequalitykeepsrising.htm

  • Okun, A. M. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big trade-off. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østby, G. (2013). Inequality and political violence: A review of the literature. International Area Studies Review, 16, 206–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2018). Addressing evidential and theoretical inconsistencies in system-justification theory with a social identity model of system attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientific American, 219, 84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2010). Population ratios and prejudice: Modelling both contact and threat effects. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Review, 96, 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2000). Who wants to redistribute?: The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R. (2011). Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22, 835–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Bailon, R., Bratanova, B., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Sturrock, A., & Loughnan, S. (2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold unequal societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. (1975). Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salverda, W. (2014, March). Can income redistribution help rising inequality? Journal for a Progressive Economy, 2(2014). Retrieved from: https://www.socialistsanddemocrats.eu/sites/default/files/progress_econ_inequality_challenge_of_the_century_en_140306.pdf

  • Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., Michelbach, P. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, C., Traub, S., & Morone, A. (2006). Relative deprivation, personal income satisfaction and average well-being under different income distributions: An experimental investigation. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Inequality, poverty and well-being (pp. 66–90). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmine (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173–211). Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., Diener, E., & Wedell, D. H. (1989). Intrapersonal and social comparison determinants of happiness: A range-frequency analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 317–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rael J. Dawtry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dawtry, R.J., Sutton, R.M., Sibley, C.G. (2019). Social Sampling, Perceptions of Wealth Distribution, and Support for Redistribution. In: Jetten, J., Peters, K. (eds) The Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics