Skip to main content

Studying Dependencies: A Conceptual Framework from the Periphery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Core-Periphery Divide in the European Union
  • 483 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the Latin American dependency school (LADS) that influenced the European dependency school (EDS). It presents important representatives of LADS and their approaches. The chapter treats the ‘ideology of national bourgeois development’ and argues that LADS saw no primacy of either internal or external dependencies of the peripheries in their relations to the core in one global capitalist economy. Furthermore the role of classes and states LADS thinking concerning core–periphery relations are being stressed. The chapter concludes by inquiring into alternatives as suggested by LADS, development by socialism, and the concept of self-reliance, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Lughod, Janet L. 1989. Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250–1350. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1974. Accumulation on a World Scale: Acritique of the Development of Underdevelopment, vol. 1. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1975 [1973]. Die ungleiche Entwicklung. Essay über die Gesellschaftsformationen des peripheren Kapitalismus. Aus dem Französischen von Hildegard und Hartmut Elsenhans. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1981. Some Thoughts of Self-Reliant Development, Collective Self-Reliance and the New International Economic Order. In The World Economic Order: Past and Prospects, ed. Sven Grassman and Erik Lundberg, 534–552. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld, Manfred, and Martin Godfrey. 1982. Introduction. In The Struggle for Development: National Strategies in an International Context, ed. Manfred Bienefeld and Martin Godfrey, 1–24. Chichester et al.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boianovsky, Mauro. 2015. Between Lévi-Strauss and Braudel: Furtado and the Historical-Structural Method in Latin American Political Economy. Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (4): 413–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand. 1992 [1985]. Chinesen, Araber … hatte nur Europa eine Chance? In 1492: die Welt zur Zeit des Kolumbus. Ein Lesebuch, ed. Rainer Beck, 187–197. München (=Beck’sche Reihe 460).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Robert. 1977. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review I/104 (July–August): 25–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ken. 1994. Word for Word/Fernando Henrique Cardoso; Having Left Campus for the Arena, Winner in Brazil Shifts to Right. New York Times, November 20. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/20/weekinreview/word-for-word-fernando-henrique-cardoso-having-left-campus-for-arena-winner.html, http://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/20/weekinreview/word-for-word-fernando-henrique-cardoso-having-left-campus-for-arena-winner.html (November 26, 2014).

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1972. Dependency and Development in Latin America. New Left Review 74: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1977a. The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review 12 (3): 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1977b. Current Theses on Latin American Development and Dependency: A Critique. Boletín de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe 13 (22): 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1976. Abhängigkeit und Entwicklung in Lateinamerika. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL (ed.). n.y. Raúl Prebisch and the Challenges of Development of the XXI Century. Textos Esenciales: Introduction to Keynes. http://prebisch.cepal.org/en/works/introduction-keynes (August 11, 2015).

  • Chase-Dunn, Christopher (ed.). 1982. Socialist States in the World System. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilcote, Ronald. 1978. A Question of Dependency. Latin American Research Review 13 (2): 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocoyoc Declaration, The. 1974. Adopted by the Participants in the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Symposium on ‘Patterns of Resource Use, Environment and Development Strategies’, October 8–12, Cocoyoc, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, Theotonio. 1970. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review 60 (2): 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, Arghiri. 1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdowsi, Mir. 1983. Editorisches Vorwort. In Galtung, Johan, Self-Reliance. Beiträge zu einer alternativen Entwicklungsstrategie, ed. Mir Ferdowsi, 5–11. München: Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiejka, Zdisław. 1981. Implementing the New International Economic Order (NIEO): Attempts at Regulating the Structure of World Industry. In Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment, ed. Dudley Seers, 150–159. London: F. Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Karin, and Rudy Weissenbacher. 2016. Ungleicher Tausch – Grundannahmen, Widersprüche und aktuelle Bedeutung eines umstrittenen Theorems. Z. Zeitschrift Marxistische Erneuerung 27 (105): 140–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Carter, Aidan. 1979. Marxism Versus Dependency Theory? A Polemic. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies 8 (3): 214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, André Gunder. 1972. Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment. Dependence, Class, and Politics in Latin America. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, André Gunder. 1974. Dependence Is Dead, Long Live Dependence and the Class Struggle: An Answer to Critics. Latin American Perspectives 1 (1): 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. n.y. Personal Research Interests for Public Policy Practice. In Andre Gunder Frank Official Website, ed. Róbinson Rojas. http://rrojasdatabank.info/agfrank/research.html#DEPENDENCE (April 26, 2016).

  • Fröbel, Folker, Jürgen Heinrichs, and Otto Kreye. 1977. Die neue internationale Arbeitsteilung: strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit in den Industrieländern und die Industrialisierung der Entwicklungsländer. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, Celso. 1967. La concentración del poder económico en los Estados Unidos y sus proyecciones en América Latina. Estudios Internacionales 1 (3–4): 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1971. A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research 8 (2): 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1972. Eine strukturelle Theorie des Imperialismus. In Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion, ed. Dieter Senghaas, 29–104. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1976a. Self-Reliance: Concept, Practice and Rationale. In Transcend International. https://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/Self-Reliance%20-%20Concept,%20Practice%20and%20Rationale.pdf (May 23, 2017).

  • Galtung, Johan. 1976b. The Politics of Self-Reliance. In Transcend International. https://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/The%20Politics%20of%20Self-Reliance.pdf (May 23, 2017).

  • Galtung, Johan. 1983 [1978]. Self-Reliance. Beiträge zu einer alternativen Entwicklungsstrategie, ed. Mir Ferdowsi. München: Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1985. Towards a New Economics: On the Theory and Practice of Self-Reliance. In Transcend International. https://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/Towards%20a%20New%20Economics-On%20the%20Theory%20and%20Practice%20of%20Self-Reliance.pdf (May 23, 2017).

  • Harris, Abram. 1942. Sombart and German (National) Socialism. Journal of Political Economy 50 (6): 805–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, Wolfgang. 1980. Zusammenarbeit zwischen Entwicklungsländern – Ansatz für “Kollektive Self-Reliance” oder Voraussetzung für die weitere Entfaltung abhängiger Akkumulation? In Self-Reliance als nationale und kollektive Entwicklungsstrategie, ed. Khushi Khan, 67–127. München und London: Weltforum (=Weltwirtschaft und internationale Beziehungen 20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtienne, Thomas. 1981. Peripherer Kapitalismus und autozentrierte Entwicklung – Zur Kritik des Erklärungsansatzes von Dieter Senghaas. Prokla 11 (3): 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Cristóbal. 1989. Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, Sanjaya. 1975. Is ‘Dependence’ a Useful Concept in Analysing Underdevelopment? World Development 3 (11 and 12): 799–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, Joseph. 1996. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Underdevelopment in Rumania and Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoilescu, Mihail. 1937. Die nationalen Produktivkräfte und der Außenhandel. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1999 [1887]. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I. Marx/Engels Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf.

  • Palloix, Christian. 1972 [1970]. The Question of Unequal Exchange: A Critique of Political Economy. Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists 2 (1): 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, Gabriel. 1978. Dependency: A Formal Theory of Underdevelopment or a Methodology for the Analysis of Concrete Situations of Underdevelopment. World Development 6 (7–8): 881–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palma, Gabriel. 1981. Dependency and Development: A Critical Overview. In Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment, ed. Dudley Seers, 20–78. London: F. Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimmer, Stefan. 2016. Ich war damals einfach interessiert an diesen neuen Paradigmen. In Dieter Senghaas über die deutschsprachige Rezeption der Dependenztheorien, ed. Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik. http://www.mattersburgerkreis.at/site/de/aktuelles/interviews/article/269.html (March 31, 2017).

  • Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Dudley (ed.). 1981. Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment. London: F. Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Dudley. 1983. The Political Economy of Nationalism. London et al.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, Dieter (ed.). 1972. Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, Dieter (ed.). 1974. Peripherer Kapitalismus: Analysen über Abhängigkeit und Unterentwicklung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, Dieter (ed.). 1979a. Kapitalistische Weltökonomie. Kontroversen über ihren Ursprung und ihre Entwicklungsdynamik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, Dieter. 1979b. Dissoziation und autozentrierte Entwicklung. Eine entwicklungspolitische Alternative für die Dritte Welt. In Kapitalistische Weltökonomie. Kontroversen über ihren Ursprung und ihre Entwicklungsdynamik, ed. Dieter Senghaas, 376–412. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, John. 2012. Outsourcing, Financialisation and the Crisis. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 6 (1–2): 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, Werner. 1915. Händler und Helden. Patriotische Besinnungen. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, Werner. 1921. Der moderne Kapitalismus. Historisch-systematische Darstellung des gesamteuropäischen Wirtschaftslebens von seinen Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Zweiter Band. Zweiter Halbband. Das europäische Wirtschaftsleben im Zeitalter des Frühkapitalismus, vornehmlich im 16., 17., und 18. Jahrhundert. Vierte, unveränderte Auflage. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, Werner. 1927. Das Wirtschaftsleben im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus. Erster Halbband. Die Grundlagen – der Aufbau. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot (=Der moderne Kapitalismus. Dritter Band, erster Halbband).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, Werner. 1934. Deutscher Sozialismus. Berlin: Buchholz & Weisswange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1972. Transnationale kapitalistische Integration und Nationale Desintegration: Der Fall Lateinamerika. In Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion, ed. Dieter Senghaas, 258–315. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1973. Transnational Capitalism and National Disintegration in Latin America. In Social and Economic Studies 22 (1): 132–176 (Based on earlier works in 1968, see FN 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1977. The Development of Development Thinking. The IDS Bulletin 8 (3): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villamil, José. 1979. Introduction. In Transnational Capitalism and National Development, ed. José Villamil, 1–15. Sussex: Harvester Press (=Harvester Studies in Development 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher, Rudy. 2005. Jugoslawien. Politische Ökonomie einer Desintegration. Wien: Promedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher, Rudy. 2007. Historical Considerations of Uneven Development in East Central Europe. In Dollarization, Euroization and Financial Instability: Central and Eastern European Countries Between Stagnation and Financial Crisis? ed. Joachim Becker and Rudy Weissenbacher, 35–83. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher, Rudy. 2008. Keeping Up Appearances: Uneven Global Development in a System of Structural Imbalances. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXIV (4): 78–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher, Rudy. 2009. Sozialismus in Jugoslawien. Die Selbstauflösung des Entwicklungsstaats. In Sozialismen. Entwicklungsmodelle von Lenin bis Nyerere, ed. Joachim Becker and Rudy Weissenbacher, 74–97. Wien: Promedia and Südwind (=Historische Sozialkunde/Internationale Entwicklung 28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlmuth, Karl. 1980. Collective Self-Reliance und die Kontrolle Transnationaler Konzerne. In Self-Reliance als nationale und kollektive Entwicklungsstrategie, ed. Khushi Khan, 323–365. München and London: Weltforum (=Weltwirtschaft und internationale Beziehungen 20).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudy Weissenbacher .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weissenbacher, R. (2019). Studying Dependencies: A Conceptual Framework from the Periphery. In: The Core-Periphery Divide in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28211-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28211-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28210-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28211-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics