Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Way for Organizations to Cope with Uncertainty: Mimetic Isomorphism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2018 (ICCLS 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Uncertainty, which means absence of sufficient clarity in obtained information and lack of full or correct information, is experienced by managers and employees because of dynamic changes within the organizational environment. Mimetic isomorphism, which is due to the attempts of organizations to minimize uncertainty, occurs when organizations mimic or take well-established and successful organizations as a model to legitimize themselves, especially where the objectives are uncertain. Competition, which accompanies globalization and massification, allows higher education institutions to react to changing social demands, with restructuring of existing programs and elimination of older ones. In this chapter, the ways in which higher education institutions mimic other such institutions when they encounter uncertainty are elaborated with examples. It is concluded that higher education institutions may adopt faulty applications as well as positive applications as a model for themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anadolu Üniversitesi. (2006). Topluma hizmet. http://iibf.anadolu.edu.tr/?page_id=440. Accessed 10 Feb 2015.

  • Balcı, A. (2011). Eğitim yönetiminin değişen bağlamı ve eğitim yönetimi programlarına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y. (2013). Careers in academe: The academic labour market as an eco-system. Career Development International, 18(2), 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., & Fidan, T. (2019). The Turkish academic labor market as an ecosystem. In T. Fidan (Ed.), Vocational identity and career construction in education (pp. 37–57). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Philips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2008). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice. Volume I: The state of the system. Sterling: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brǿgger, K. (2016). The rule of mimetic desire in higher education: Governing through naming, shaming and faming. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. (2000). The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESA/DPAD [Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Development Policy & Analysis Division]. (2017). Frontier issues: The impact of the technological revolution on labor markets and income distribution. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/frontier-issues-artificial-intelligence-and-other-technologies-will-define-the-future-of-jobs-and-incomes/.

  • Dill, D. D. (2010). Quality assurance in higher education: Practices and issues. In P. P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 377–383). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. (2011a). Dokuz Eylül University Bologna Process (In Turkish). http://webb.deu.edu.tr/bologna/index.php/bologna-suereci-nedir. Accessed 6 Mar 2019.

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. (2011b). Bologna Process member states (In Turkish). http://webb.deu.edu.tr/bologna/index.php/bologna-suerecine-ueye-uelkeler. Accessed 6 Mar 2019.

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. (2011c). 10 action titles of the Bologna Process (In Turkish). http://webb.deu.edu.tr/bologna/index.php/bologna-suerecinin-10-eylem-bal. Accessed 6 Mar 2019.

  • Dominelli, L., & Hoogvelt, A. (1996). Globalization, contract government and the Taylorization of intelluctual labour in academia. Studies in Political Economy, 49, 71–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, H. K., & Slocum, J. W. (1975). Uncertainty: Measures, research and sources of variation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 562–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Kayman, E. A. (2014). How to be a quantum leader in an intelligent organization? In S. Banerjee & Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2012 (pp. 247–252). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fidan, T. (2017). Kurumsalcılık yaklaşımları ve yeni kurumsalcılık perspektifinden eğitim örgütleri. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fırat Üniversitesi. (2011). Fırat Üniversitesi internal audit unit annual report (year 2011) (In Turkish). http://web.firat.edu.tr/icdenetim/FR/F%C3%9C%20%C4%B0DB%20Faaliyet%20Raporu%202011.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.

  • Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1987). The institutionalization of unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V. (2007). What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçel, T. (2011). İşletme yöneticiliği (13. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondra, A. Z., & Hinings, C. R. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19(5), 743–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondra, A. Z., & Hurst, D. C. (2009). Institutional processes of organizational culture. Culture and Organization, 15(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. W. (2015). Uncertainty and communication in organizations. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1787–1866. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. C. (2006). How private higher education’s growth challenges the new institutionalism. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 143–161). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, L., Kidder, D., Eddleston, K., Litzky, B., & Kellermanns, F. (2017). A conservation of resources study of standard and contingent employees. Personnel Review, 46(3), 644–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, K. (2013). Organizational theory in higher education. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E. F., III, & Leifer, R. (1983). Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 727–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1983). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer, & W. R. Scott (Eds.). Organizational environments. (p. 45–70). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1987). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and respeonse uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. (2002). “A rose by any other name”: Which colleges became universities. Review of Higher Education, 25(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyişci, N., & Potas, N. (2014). Avoidance behaviors of school managers in uncertain and chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee & Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2012 (pp. 219–227). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk Fidan, İ. (2018). Üniversitelerde iz bırakma ve kurumsallaşma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J. A., Lester, D. L., & Menefee, M. L. (2000). Strategy as a response to organizational uncertainty: An alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management Decision, 38(8), 520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007). Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process—A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software., 22, 1543–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayıştay. (2018). 2017 yılı dış denetim genel değerlendirme raporu: Eylül 2018. Ankara: Sayıştay Başkanlığı.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In P. J. DiMaggio, & W. W. Powell (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. (p. 164–182). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şimşek, H., & Louis, K. S. (1994). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 670–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2007). Non representational theory: Space, politics, affect. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S., & Digman, L. A. (1987). Decision support system: A new tool for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 20(2), 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YöK. (2006). Dersler ve içerikleri. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanliği.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2006). Eğitim fakültelerinde uygulanacak yeni programlar hakkında açıklama. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/49665/aciklama_programlar/aa7bd091-9328-4df7-aafa-2b99edb6872f. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr. Tuncer Fidan for his valuable opinions regarding the auditing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    İnci Öztürk

Authors
  1. İnci Öztürk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Şefika Şule ERÇETİN

  2. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Şuay Nilhan AÇIKALIN

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Öztürk, İ. (2020). A Way for Organizations to Cope with Uncertainty: Mimetic Isomorphism. In: ERÇETİN, Ş., AÇIKALIN, Ş. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2018. ICCLS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27672-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation