Skip to main content

Remote Sensing Image Mixed Noise Denoising with Noise Parameter Estimation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
5th International Symposium of Space Optical Instruments and Applications (ISSOIA 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 232))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Images acquired by optical remote sensing often suffer from noise, due to low-light conditions and long distances from the object. Noise introduces undesirable effects such as artifacts, unrealistic edges, unseen lines and corners, blurred objects and disturbed background scenes, and decreasing the performance of visual and computational analysis.

The great majority of denoising methods only focus on single noise type, and mostly assume additive Gaussian white noise. However, in practice, according to the different sources of noise during the capturing process, the real image noise may be composed of noises from several different distributions, i.e., Poisson distribution from shot noise and dark current, Gaussian distribution from readout noise, etc. Thus, it is hard to model complex noise with a single noise model, which therefore limits the practical performance of image denoiser for real captured images. To address this problem, we propose a deep residual network with parameter estimation to model and remove mixed noises of remote sensing data, with no noise type and noise level information.

In this chapter, a deep convolutional neural network based framework is proposed to implement both noise estimation and noise removing. The framework is composed of noise estimator module and denoiser module. The noise estimator module is used to estimate the noise distribution characteristics of the input image, which are used to synthesize the noisy dataset for the training of the denoiser module. After training, the denoiser module can then denoise the input image specifically for that noise characteristic of the input image. Besides, we use some advanced designment to improve the performance of the network like residual learning, skip connections, and perceptual loss. Our model works for both given noise types and others without taking into account in training process, and for the latter case we test the model on the noise mixed with different types, i.e., shot noise, Gaussian noise, salt and pepper noise, speckle noise, dark current, and quantization noise, covering most of the common noise types in practical situation. The estimated noise distribution according to the proposed estimator is compared with the ground truth to validate the performance of the estimator. We also compare the proposed method with the existing denoising methods, including both the traditional algorithm (i.e., BM3D (Dabov et al., IEEE Trans Image Process 16:2080–2095, 2007)) and the deep neural network (i.e., DnCNN (Zhang et al., IEEE Trans Image Process 26:3142–3155, 2017)). Experimental results showed that our method outperforms these state-of-the-art methods in both PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio) and SSIM (structural similarity index).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu, C., Qiu, Q., Zhao, Y., Chen, X.: Satellite image classification using morphological component analysis of texture and cartoon layers. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 10(5), 1109–1113 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, H., Zhang, L.: A hybrid automatic endmember extraction algorithm based on a local window. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49(11), 4223–4238 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martínez-López, J., Carreño, M.F., Palazón-Ferrando, J.A., Martínez-Fernández, J., Esteve, M.A.: Remote sensing of plant communities as a tool for assessing the condition of semiarid Mediterranean saline wetlands in agricultural catchments. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 26, 193–204 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Misra, A., Kartikeyan, B., Garg, S.: Noise Removal Techniques for Microwave Remote Sensing Radar Data and its Evaluation. AIRCC Publishing Corporation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Song, Q., Wang, Y., Yan, X., Gu, H.: Remote sensing images stripe noise removal by double sparse regulation and region separation. Remote Sens. 10(7), 998 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie, J., Xu, L., Chen, E.: Image denoising and inpainting with deep neural networks. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 350–358 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., Zhang, L.: Beyond a gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao, X., Shen, C., Yang, Y.B.: Image restoration using very deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks with symmetric skip connections. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2802–2810 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osher, S., Burger, M., Goldfarb, D., Xu, J., Yin, W.: An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration. Multiscale Model. Sim. 4(2), 460–489 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D. 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.O.: Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(8), 2080–2095 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee, P., Milanfar, P.: Clustering-based denoising with locally learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18(7), 1438–1451 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan, Q., Zhang, L., Shen, H.: Hyperspectral image denoising employing a spectral–spatial adaptive total variation model. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50(10), 3660–3677 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burger, H.C., Schuler, C.J., Harmeling, S.: Image denoising: can plain neural networks compete with BM3D? In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. Patt. Recogn., pp. 2392–2399 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, J., Zhong, P., Chen, Y., Li, S.: $ L_ {1/2} $-regularized deconvolution network for the representation and restoration of optical remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(5), 2617–2627 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: International Conference for Learning Representations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Machine Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, J., Alahi, A., Fei-Fei, L.: Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 694–711. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.escience.cn/people/yangwen/whu-rs19.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by NSFC Projects 61671236, and National Science Foundation for Young Scholar of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20160634), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. 0210-14380067).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mutian Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, M., Zhao, S., Cao, X., Yue, T., Hu, X. (2020). Remote Sensing Image Mixed Noise Denoising with Noise Parameter Estimation. In: Urbach, H., Yu, Q. (eds) 5th International Symposium of Space Optical Instruments and Applications. ISSOIA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 232. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27300-2_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics