Abstract
Robot tutors provide new opportunities for education. However, they also introduce moral challenges. This study reports a systematic literature review (Nā=ā256) aimed at identifying the moral considerations related to robots in education. While our findings suggest that robot tutors hold great potential for improving education, there are multiple values of both (special needs) children and teachers that are impacted (positively and negatively) by its introduction. Positive values related to robot tutors are: psychological welfare and happiness, efficiency, freedom from bias and usability. However, there are also concerns that robot tutors may negatively impact these same values. Other concerns relate to the values of friendship and attachment, human contact, deception and trust, privacy, security, safety and accountability. All these values relate to children and teachers. The moral values of other stakeholder groups, such as parents, are overlooked in the existing literature. The results suggest that, while there is a potential for applying robot tutors in a morally justified way, there are imported stakeholder groups that need to be consulted to also take their moral values into consideration by implementing tutor robots in an educational setting.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Catlin, D., Kandlhofer, M., Holmquist, S., Csizmadia, A.P., Cabibihan, J.-J., Angel-Fernandez, J.: EduRobot taxonomy and papertās paradigm. In: Dagiene, V., Jasute, E. (eds.) Constructionism 2018 Constructionism, Computational Thinking and Educational Innovation: Conference Proceedings, Vilnius, Lithuania, p. 11 (2018)
Leite, I., Martinho, C., Paiva, A.: Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5, 291ā308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y
Miller, D., Nourbakhsh, I., Siegwart, R.: Robots for education. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1283ā1301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_56
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3, 10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
Baxter, P., Ashurst, E., Kennedy, J., Senft, E., Lemaignan, S., Belpaeme, T.: The wider supportive role of social robots in the classroom for teachers. In: 1st International Workshop on Educational Robotics at the International Conference on Social Robotics, Paris, France, p. 6 (2015)
Heerink, M., Vanderborght, B., Broekens, J., AlbĆ³-Canals, J.: New friends: social robots in therapy and education. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8, 443ā444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0374-7
Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.: Robot ethics: mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artif. Intell. 175, 942ā949 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.026
Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Leite, I., Hastie, H., Jones, A., Paiva, A., Vasalou, A., Castellano, G.: Teachersā views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 955ā960. IEEE, Edinburgh (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926376
Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Vasalou, A., Alves-Oliveira, P., Jones, A., Petisca, S., Paiva, A.: The case of classroom robots: teachersā deliberations on the ethical tensions. AI Soc. 32, 613ā631 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0667-2
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., van de Poel, I., Gorman, M.E. (eds.) Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, pp. 55ā95. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4
Rawls, J.: The independence of moral theory. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, p. 5. American Philosophical Association (1974). https://doi.org/10.2307/3129858
van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., van der Ven, S., Leseman, P.: Social robots for language learning: a review. Rev. Educ. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286
Heersmink, R., Timmermans, J., van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K.: ETICA Project: D.2.2 Normative Issues Report (2014)
Sharkey, A.J.C.: Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics Inf. Technol. 18, 283ā297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z
Spiekermann, S.: Ethical IT Innovation: A Value-Based System Design Approach. Auerbach Publications (2015). https://doi.org/10.1201/b19060
Smakman, M.: Moral concerns regarding tutor robots, a systematic review. In: ATEE Winter Conference, Technology and Innovative Learning, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2018). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33565.00482
The data-analysis data. https://osf.io/97uza/
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3ā21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
Konermann, J., Janssen, H., Vennegoor, G.: Naar een actief en open stakeholdersbeleid in het voortgezet onderwijs: stakeholders in kaart brengen, mobiliseren en managen, ās-Hertogenbosch (2010)
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Jr.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1177ā1201. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (2003)
Van Den Hoven, J.: Responsible Innovation. Presented at the Third International Conference on Responsible Innovation, 22 May, The Hague, The Netherlands (2014)
Shih, C.-F., Chang, C.-W., Chen, G.-D.: Robot as a storytelling partner in the english classroom - preliminary discussion. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), pp. 678ā682. IEEE, Niigata (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.219
Sumioka, H., Yoshikawa, Y., Wada, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Teachersā impressions on robots for therapeutic applications. In: Otake, M., Kurahashi, S., Ota, Y., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 462ā469. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_33
Brown, L., Kerwin, R., Howard, A.M.: Applying behavioral strategies for student engagement using a robotic educational agent. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 4360ā4365. IEEE, Manchester (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.744
Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Haeri, N.S.: Young EFL learnersā attitude towards RALL: an observational study focusing on motivation, anxiety, and interaction. In: Kheddar, A., Yoshida, E., Ge, S.S., Suzuki, K., Cabibihan, J.-J., Eyssel, F., He, H. (eds.) Social Robotics, pp. 252ā261. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_25
Fridin, M.: Kindergarten social assistive robot: first meeting and ethical issues. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 262ā272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.005
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J.: A storytelling robot: modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 518ā523. IEEE, University of Genova, Genova, Italy (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2006.321322
Ko, W.H., Ji, S.H., Lee, S.M., Nam, K.-T.: Design of a personalized r-learning system for children. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 6. IEEE, Taipei (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5649668
Wei, C.-W., Hung, I.-C., Lee, L., Chen, N.-S.: A joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics multiplication. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 10, 11ā23 (2011)
Han, J.: Robot-aided learning and r-learning services. In: Human-Robot Interaction. Intech Open Access Publisher (2010)
Huijnen, C.A.G.J., Lexis, M.A.S., Jansens, R., de Witte, L.P.: Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 2100ā2114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2740-6
Reich-Stiebert, N., Eyssel, F.: Robots in the classroom: what teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In: Social Robotics, pp. 671ā680. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_66
Ahmad, M.I., Mubin, O., Orlando, J.: Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: teacherās perspective. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pp. 297ā304. ACM Press, Biopolis (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2974804.2974829
Kennedy, J., Lemaignan, S., Belpaeme, T.: The cautious attitude of teachers towards social robots in schools. In: Robots 4 Learning Workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2016, p. 6 (2016)
Pandey, A.K., Gelin, R.: Humanoid robots in education: a short review. In: Goswami, A., Vadakkepat, P. (eds.) Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, pp. 1ā16. Springer, Dordrecht (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7194-9_113-1
Zawieska, K., SproÅska, A.: Anthropomorphic robots and human meaning makers in education. In: Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Menegatti, E. (eds.) Edurobotics 2016 2016. AISC, vol. 560, pp. 251ā255. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_24
Salvini, P., Korsah, A., Nourbakhsh, I.: Yet Another Robot Application? [From the Guest Editors]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 23, 12ā105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2550958
Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S., Kim, S.: The educational use of home robots for children. In: ROMAN 2005. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 378ā383. IEEE, Nashville (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513808
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smakman, M., Konijn, E.A. (2020). Robot Tutors: Welcome or Ethically Questionable?. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., ObdrÅ¾Ć”lek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26944-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26945-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)