Abstract
Mindfulness has traditionally been understood from an individual perspective, without necessarily reviewing or questioning the conception of the self involved, an understanding that has consequences at a practical level, derived from its different applications. In response to this trend, we develop an understanding perspective of Mindfulness in a relational setting. There is a contrast between the suppositions of the delimited being and those of the relational being. The delimited being carries a modern vision, typical of a representational cognitivism, which we question in this article. To have clarity in the field of the self, and following the distinction advanced by Ricoeur, we describe two modes of use of the term identity: identity as sameness and identity as ipseity. In this article, we review these different notions of identity and then apply them to the field of mindfulness, where an individual and delimited notion of self has historically prevailed. In contrast, the alternative of a relational perspective grants access to the mindfulness moments of the relationship with oneself and others. In this context, we propose developing a relational perspective to understand mindfulness, which is characterized by being embodied in the world of life with others. Arguing from the perspective of the relational self, the article details the consequences of sustaining a non-individualistic conception of human development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Araya-Véliz, C., Arístegui, R., & Fossa, P. (2017). Pasos hacia una enacción relacional. Aporte, ambigüedades y limitaciones del concepto embodied mind en Francisco Varela: un análisis meta-teórico. Mindfulness & Compassion, 2(1), 41–46.
Araya-Véliz, C. & Arístegui, R., (2016). Pasos hacia un bienestar relacional: Mindfulness como un espacio de relación con otros. In Daniel Duhart y David Sirlopú (Ed.), Bienestar y Espiritualidad: Diálogos desde la psicología, la filosofía y la sociología (pp. 61–72). Santiago: UDD Ediciones.
Arístegui, R. (2017a). Enaction and neurophenomenology in language. In A. Ibáñez, L. Sedeño, & A. García (Eds.), Neuroscience and social science: The Missing Link (pp. 471–500). Switzerland: Springer.
Arístegui, R. (2017b). Fenomenología Hermenéutica, Análisis Existencial, Mindfulness. https://www.researchgate.net/publications/314405001. Accessed January 30, 2019.
Arístegui, R. (2015). Construccionismo social y Discusión de Paradigmas en Psicología. USA: The Taos Institute Publications/WorldShare Books.
Black, D. (2015). American mindfulness research association-AMRA-Data base. https://goamra.org/resources/. Accessed January 30, 2019.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Taylor, C. (2016). Recuperar el realismo. Madrid: Rialp.
Erikson, E. H. (1998). The life cycle completed. London: W.W. Norton & Co.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2013). La mente fenomenológica. Madrid: Alianza.
Gergen, K. (2015). El ser relacional. Bilbao: Editorial Desclée De Brouwer, S.A.
Heidegger, M. (1926/2013). Being and time. Malden: Blackwell.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte.
Kwee, M. G. T. (Ed.). (2010). New horizons in Buddhist psychology. Chagrin Falls: Taos Institute Publications.
Kwee, M. G. T., Gergen, K. J., & Koshikawa, F. (Eds.). (2006). Horizons in Buddhist psychology: Practice, research & theory. Taos, NM: Taos Institute Publications.
McCown, D. (2013). The Ethical space of mindfulness in clinical practice. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/the-ethical-space-of-mindfulness-in-clinical-practice. Accessed January 30, 2019.
McCown, D., Reibel, D., & Micozzi, M. (2015). Teaching mindfulness. New York: Springer.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Conjeturas y refutaciones: El desarrollo del conocimiento cientifico. Spain: Paidós.
Ricœur, P. (1995). Oneself as another. Chicago: Unioversity of Chicago Press.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sartre, J. P. (1968). La trascendencia del ego. Buenos Aires: Calden.
Siegel, D. J. (2012). Pocket guide to interpersonal neurobiology: An integrative handbook of the mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Tugendhat, E. (2004). Egocentricidad y Mística. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Varela, F. J. (2006). Conocer: Las ciencias cognitivas; tendencias y perspectivas cartografía de las ideas actuales. Spain: Editorial Gedisa.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arístegui, R., Araya-Véliz, C. (2019). A Framework for Relational Mindfulness: Implications for Human Development. In: Steinebach, C., Langer, Á. (eds) Enhancing Resilience in Youth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25513-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25513-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25512-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25513-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)