Skip to main content

Prediction Capabilities of Two Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models for a Turbulent Wake Subjected to Adverse Pressure Gradient

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XII (DGLR 2018)

Abstract

The present contribution focuses on the behavior of two RANS Reynolds stress turbulence models in the prediction of flow reversal occurring in turbulent wakes subjected to strong adverse pressure gradients. RANS results are compared to a high-fidelity RANS-IDDES solution for an experimental set-up from Driver and Mateer. The tested models are the JHh-\(\varepsilon ^h\) v2 and the SSG/LRR-\(\omega \). Additionally, the comparison includes a modified version of the SSG/LRR-\(\omega \) model where the sensitivity to pressure gradients is enhanced by the \(S_{\varepsilon 4}\) term, which is already present in the JHh-\(\varepsilon ^h\) v2 model. None of these RANS approaches was able to capture the flow recirculation as shown by the IDDES. The analysis aims at characterizing the wake flow and identifying possible sources of the RANS shortcomings, such as departure from dynamic equilibrium and strong Reynolds stress anisotropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Driver, D.M., Mateer, G.G.: Evolution of a planar wake in adverse pressure gradient. NASA/TM-2016-219068 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tummers, M.J., Hanjalić, K., Passchier, D.M., Henkes, R.A.W.M.: Computations of a turbulent wake in a strong adverse pressure gradient. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 28, 418–428 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shur, M.L., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M.Kh., Travin, A.K.: A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 1638–1649 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shur, M.L., Strelets, M.Kh., Travin, A.K., Radespiel, R., Scholz, P., Breitenstein, W., Knopp, T.: Experimental/numerical study of turbulent wake in adverse pressure gradient. In: Numerical Notes in Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Optimization, from the 7th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, Berlin, 17–19 September 2018

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shur, M.L., Strelets, M.Kh., Travin, A.K.: High-order implicit multi-block Navier-Stokes code: ten-years experience of application to RANS/DES/LES/DNS of turbulent flows (2004). https://cfd.spbstu.ru//agarbaruk/doc/NTS_code.pdf

  6. Kroll, N., Rossow, C.-C., Schwamborn, D.: The MEGAFLOW project - numerical flow simulation for aircraft. In: Di Bucchianico, A., Mattheij, R., Peletier, M. (eds.) Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2004. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jakirlić, S., Hanjalić, K.: A new approach to modelling near-wall turbulence energy and stress dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 459, 139–166 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisfeld, B., Rumsey, C., Togiti, V.: Verification and validation of a second-moment-closure model. AIAA J. 54(5), 1524–1541 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Probst, A., Radespiel, R.: Implementation and extension of a near-wall Reynolds-stress model for application to aerodynamic flows on unstructured meshes. In: AIAA-2008-770, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 7–10 January 2008

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cecora, R., Radespiel, R., Eisfeld, B., Probst, A.: Differential Reynolds-stress modeling for aeronautics. AIAA J. 53(3), 739–755 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alber, I.E.: Turbulent wake of a thin, flat plate. AIAA J. 18(9), 1044–1051 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Maciel, Y., Wei, T., Gungor, A.G., Simens, M.: Outer scales and parameters of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 844, 5–35 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pope, S.B.: Turbulent Flows. Cornell University, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding of the project by DFG and RBRF (Grants No. RA 595/26-1, 17-58-12002 and KN 888/3-1) is thankfully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Burnazzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Burnazzi, M. et al. (2020). Prediction Capabilities of Two Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models for a Turbulent Wake Subjected to Adverse Pressure Gradient. In: Dillmann, A., Heller, G., Krämer, E., Wagner, C., Tropea, C., Jakirlić, S. (eds) New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XII. DGLR 2018. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25252-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25253-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics