Abstract
Midfacial fractures occur in a variety of patterns. For doctors to understand the severity of these fractures, it is important for them to identify the types of fracture and its clinical relevance. This complexity can be solved by having a three-dimensional physical model using Additive Manufacturing (AM) Technology. The aim of this paper is to do Orbital volume analysis of Midfacial fractures by 3D Printing medical models of the skull using Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) process. The methodology involves collection of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative CT scan images of the patient in DICOM format and converting it to 3D CAD model using InVesalius medical imaging software. The generated 3D CAD model is saved in .STL format and is then transferred to Flashforge FDM machine for printing Pre-Operative and Post-Operative 3D medical models. Measurements are taken on both Pre-Operative and Post-Operative 3D printed medical models at fixed landmarks to calculate the Orbital volume. These values are compared with Unfractured orbit of skull to find out the percentage of restoration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AOCMF Classification Midface (Level 1 and 2), AO Surgery reference, pp 1–13
Aktop S, Gonul O, Satilmis T, Garip H, Goker K (2013) Management of midfacial fractures. INTECH, pp 415–446
Siva Rama Krishna L, Vemulakonda BS, Potturi A (2018) Evaluation of zygomatic complex fractures based on three point fixation technique using additive manufacturing. Int J Sci Res Sci Technol 4(2):1092–1100
Chang PS-H, Parker TH, Patrick CW, Miller MJ (2003) The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. J Craniofac Surg 14(2):164–170
Dincă LL, Banu A, Vișan A (2017) Additive manufacturing in maxillofacial reconstruction. In: MATEC web of conferences, vol 137, pp 1–6
Buckingham ED, Glasgold R, Kontis T, Smith SP Jr, Dolev Y, Fitzgerald R, Lam SM, Williams EF, Pollei TR, Kunz C (2015) Volume management of the middle third-lowerorbit/midface. Fac Plast Surg 31(1/2015):55–69 Issue Theme: Management of Facial Volume
Hwang WJ, Lee DH, Choi W, Hwang JH, Kim KS, Lee SY (2017) Analysis of orbital volume measurements following reduction and internal fixation using absorbable mesh plates and screws for patients with orbital floor blowout fractures. J Craniofac Surg 28(7):1–6
Dave TV, Gaur G, Chowdary N, Joshi D (2018) Customized 3D printing: a novel approach to migrated orbital implant. Saudi J Ophthalmol 32(4):330–333
Acknowledgement
The Authors would like to thank UGC, South Eastern Regional Office, Hyderabad, as this research is carried out as a part of UGC Minor Research Project titled “Assessment of Dimensional Accuracy of Facial (Zygomatic) bone fractures reduction using Additive Manufacturing: a Randomized Control Study” Proposal No. 1204, Letter No. F. No: 4-4/2015-16/MRP/UGC-SERO, Dt. Oct 2016 sanctioned to Dr. L. Siva Rama Krishna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siva Rama Krishna, L., Vanapalli, S.D., Venkatesh, S., Potturi, A. (2020). Orbital Volume Analysis of Midfacial Fractures Using Additive Manufacturing Technologies. In: Satapathy, S., Raju, K., Molugaram, K., Krishnaiah, A., Tsihrintzis, G. (eds) International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE). Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_67
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_67
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24313-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24314-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)