Abstract
Anecdotes of patients who experience unexpectedly profound and/or durable responses to a specific cancer treatment, inconsistent with the experience of the vast majority of patients who receive that same treatment, are replete within the scientific literature [1]. The relevance of such outlier responses has usually not been well defined; however, in the context of clinical trials of anti-cancer therapies in which only a minority of patients (or even a single patient) achieves a substantial response, durable responses can often have significant repercussions. The efficacy of such drugs is by definition interpreted based upon the response of the overall study population, frequently leading to a failure of further drug development. Before the advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), detailed analysis of patient responders was extremely challenging. Moreover, clinical trials of targeted therapies in large part initially adopted traditional histology-based eligibility criteria, leading to the accrual of patients whose tumors did not harbor the putative target inhibited by targeted agents. The phenotype of enhanced sensitivity to a drug observed within outlier cases or “exceptional responders” can now be interrogated using NGS to define their genomic underpinnings and ultimately to use this information to inform the design of future clinical trials. Additionally, outlier responders represent a unique opportunity to identify new predictive biomarkers of exquisite sensitivity to targeted therapy (or traditional chemotherapy), delineating a subset of patients that could significantly benefit from these drugs as compared to the overall population. In contrast to other strategies to identify actionable targets, such as the large-scale analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [2], examination of exceptional responders represents a phenotype-to-genotype approach in an individual, outcome-driven context that has the potential to enhance our understanding of tumor biology, inform clinical trial design, identify novel therapeutic targets, salvage drugs deemed ineffective within a genetically undefined patient population, and define more precise subgroups of patients who may benefit from new or existing drugs. In this chapter, we will describe examples of how detailed genomic analysis of extreme responses to a variety of treatments has resulted in improved insight into the molecular pathogenesis of a specific disease subtype or uncovered putative therapeutic targets for further investigation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang DK, Grimmond SM, Evans TR et al (2014) Mining the genomes of exceptional responders. Nat Rev Cancer 14:291–292
Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, Mills GB et al (2013) The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project. Nat Genet 45:1113–1120
Iyer G, Hanrahan AJ, Milowsky MI et al (2012) Genome sequencing identifies a basis for everolimus sensitivity. Science 338:221
Milowsky MI, Iyer G, Regazzi AM et al (2013) Phase II study of everolimus in metastatic urothelial cancer. BJU Int 112:462–470
Lopez-Lago MA, Okada T, Murillo MM et al (2009) Loss of the tumor suppressor gene NF2, encoding merlin, constitutively activates integrin-dependent mTORC1 signaling. Mol Cell Biol 29:4235–4249
James MF, Han S, Polizzano C et al (2009) NF2/merlin is a novel negative regulator of mTOR complex 1, and activation of mTORC1 is associated with meningioma and schwannoma growth. Mol Cell Biol 29:4250–4261
Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:2271–2281
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2010) Phase 3 trial of everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma : final results and analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 116:4256–4265
Molina AM, Ginsberg MS, Motzer RJ (2011) Long-term response with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to sunitinib. Med Oncol 28:1527–1529
Cheng DT, Mitchell TN, Zehir A et al (2015) Memorial sloan kettering-integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT): a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for solid tumor molecular oncology. J Mol Diagn 17:251–264
Voss MH, Hakimi AA, Pham CG et al (2014) Tumor genetic analyses of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and extended benefit from mTOR inhibitor therapy. Clin Cancer Res 20:1955–1964
Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892
Ikezoe T, Yang Y, Nishioka C et al (2006) Effect of SU11248 on gastrointestinal stromal tumor-T1 cells: enhancement of growth inhibition via inhibition of 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Cancer Sci 97:945–951
Wagle N, Grabiner BC, Van Allen EM et al (2014) Activating mTOR mutations in a patient with an extraordinary response on a phase I trial of everolimus and pazopanib. Cancer Discov 4:546–553
Al-Ahmadie H, Iyer G, Hohl M et al (2014) Synthetic lethality in ATM-deficient RAD50-mutant tumors underlies outlier response to cancer therapy. Cancer Discov 4:1014–1021
Peng G, Woodman SE, Mills GB (2014) RADical response puts an exceptional responder in CHKmate: a synthetic lethal curative response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy? Cancer Discov 4:988–990
Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA et al (2013) Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 31:1023–1031
Mehnert JM, Panda A, Zhong H et al (2016) Immune activation and response to pembrolizumab in POLE-mutant endometrial cancer. J Clin Invest 126:2334–2340
Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD et al (2013) Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 497:67–73
van Gool IC, Eggink FA, Freeman-Mills L et al (2015) POLE proofreading mutations elicit an antitumor immune response in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21:3347–3355
Santin AD, Bellone S, Buza N et al (2016) Regression of chemotherapy-resistant polymerase epsilon (POLE) ultra-mutated and MSH6 hyper-mutated endometrial tumors with nivolumab. Clin Cancer Res 22:5682–5687
Van Allen EM, Mouw KW, Kim P et al (2014) Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Discov 4:1140–1153
Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V et al (2013) Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:134–140
Grisham RN, Sylvester BE, Won H et al (2015) Extreme outlier analysis identifies occult mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:4099–4105
Wagle N, Grabiner BC, Van Allen EM et al (2014) Response and acquired resistance to everolimus in anaplastic thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 371:1426–1433
Wagle N, Emery C, Berger MF et al (2011) Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic profiling. J Clin Oncol 29:3085–3096
Abrams J, Conley B, Mooney M et al (2014) National cancer institute’s precision medicine initiatives for the new national clinical trials network. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 34:71–76
Mullard A (2014) Learning from exceptional drug responders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:401–402
Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P et al (2013) Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499:214–218
Willyard C (2013) ‘Basket studies’ will hold intricate data for cancer drug approvals. Nat Med 19:655
Redig AJ, Janne PA (2015) Basket trials and the evolution of clinical trial design in an era of genomic medicine. J Clin Oncol 33:975–977
McNeil C (2015) NCI-MATCH launch highlights new trial design in precision-medicine era. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:djv193
Lih CJ, Harrington RD, Sims DJ et al (2017) Analytical validation of the next-generation sequencing assay for a nationwide signal-finding clinical trial: molecular analysis for therapy choice clinical trial. J Mol Diagn 19:313–327
Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V et al (2015) Vemurafenib in multiple nonmelanoma cancers with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 373:726–736
Mehra N, Lorente D, de Bono JS (2015) What have we learned from exceptional tumour responses?: review and perspectives. Curr Opin Oncol 27:267–275
Forshew T, Murtaza M, Parkinson C et al (2012) Noninvasive identification and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Sci Transl Med 4:136ra68
Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DW et al (2013) Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 497:108–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, M., Iyer, G. (2019). Exceptional Responders. In: Roychowdhury, S., Van Allen, E. (eds) Precision Cancer Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23637-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23637-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23636-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23637-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)