Skip to main content

It Doesn’t Seem_It, But It Is. A Neurofilmological Approach to the Subjective Experience of Moving-Image Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 23))

  • 653 Accesses

Abstract

This article illustrates the first steps of a research project concerning the “Subjective Experience and Estimation of Moving-Image Time” (SEEM_IT). After introducing the theoretical background of the research, that links time perception to the embodied experience of movement, the article presents the main empirical results of an experiment aimed at assessing how spectators’ time perception is affected by the style of editing and the type of represented action in short video clips. Though the style of editing played a major role in influencing SEEM_IT, it also significantly interacted with the type of represented action. The article reassesses these findings by discussing them within the theoretical framework of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, B. (2004). Time: Key concepts. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglioti, S.A., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Natural Neurosciences, 11(9), 1109–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, R., & Sigrist, M.-J. (Eds.). (2016). Time and the philosophy of action. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, M. (Ed.). (2012). Time in television narrative. Exploring temporality in twenty-first-century programming. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arstila, V., & Lloyd, D. (Eds.). (2014). Subjective time. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellour, R. (2009). Le corps du cinéma. Hypnoses, émotions, animalités. Paris: POL Traffic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benini, A. (2017). Neurobiologia del tempo. Milano: Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, T., & Cohen, D.J. (2011). The illusion of continuity: Active perception and the classical editing system. Journal of Film and Video, 63, 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettetini, G. (1979). Tempo del senso. La logica temporale dei testi audiovisivi. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R., & Grondin, S. (2014). Timing and time perception: A selective review and commentary on recent reviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M.G. (1993). Time estimation and expectancies. Memory and Cognition, 21, 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M.G. (1998). Task predictability and remembered duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 768–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (2006). The way Hollywood tells it. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(I), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonomano, D. (2017). Your brain is a time machine. The neuroscience and physics of time. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, A. (2017). Why time flies. A mostly scientific investigation. New York/London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, J., & Elias, A.J. (Eds.). (2016). Time. A vocabulary of the present. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, L. (2016). Doing time. Temporality, hermeneutics, and contemporary cinema. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.S., Henin, S., & Parra, L.C. (2017). Engaging narratives evoke similar neural activity and lead to similar time perception. Scientific Reports, 7(4578), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colling, J.L., Thompson, W.F., & Sutton, J. (2014). The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 1193–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull, J.T., Vidal, F., Burle, B. (2016). When to act, or not to act: that’s the SMA’s question. In W.H Meck, R.B. Ivry (Eds.), (pp. 14–21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G., & Heath, S. (Eds.). (2002). Social conceptions of time. Structure and process in work and everyday life. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. (1995). Image and mind: Film, philosophy, and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. (2004). Can there be a literary philosophy of time? In G. Currie (Ed.), Arts and Minds (pp. 84–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J.E. (2005). Perceiving scenes in film and in the world. In J.D. Anderson & B.F. Anderson (Eds.), Moving image theory: Ecological considerations (pp. 9–27). Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J.E., & Candan, A. (2013). Movies, evolution, and mind: From fragmentation to continuity. The Evolutionary Review, 4(3), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J.E., & Candan, A. (2015). Shot durations, shot classes, and the increased pace of popular movies. Projections, 9(2), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aloia, A., & Eugeni, R. (Eds.). (2014). Neurofilmology. Audiovisual studies and the challenge of neurosciences. [special issue] Cinéma et Cie. International Film Studies Journal, XIV, 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ydewalle, G., & Vanderbeeken, M. (1990). Perceptual and cognitive processing of editing rules in film. In R. Groner, G. d’Ydewalle, & R. Parham (Eds.), From eye to mind: Information acquisition in perception, search, and reading (pp. 129–139). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ydewalle, G., Desmet, G., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1998). Film perception: The processing of film cuts. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 357–367). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2002). Remembering when. Scientific American, 287(3. [Special issue] A Matter of Time), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wied, M. (1994). The role of temporal expectancies in the production of film suspense. Poetics, 23, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wied, M., Tan, E. S. H., Frijda N. H. (1992). Duration experience under conditions of suspense in films. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W.J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, Action and Cognition. Towards bridging the gap (pp. 325–336). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M.A. (2002). The emergence of cinematic time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, L., & Furman, M. (Eds.). (2018). Time in the brain, Special issues of Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(10), 84–952; and Trends in Neurosciences, 41(10), 641–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droit-Volet, S. (2014). What emotions tell us about time.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. (2016). Passage of time judgements are not time judgements: Evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droit-Volet, S., Fayolle, S., Lamotte, M., & Gil, S. (2013). Time, emotion and the embodiment of timing. Timing and Time Perception, 1, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droit-Volet, S., Trahanias, P., & Maniadakis, M. (2017). Passage of time judgments in everyday life are not related to duration judgments except for long durations of several minutes. Acta Psychologica, 173, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethis, E. (2006). Les spectateurs du temps. Pour une sociologie de la réception du cinema. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, S., Droit-Volet, S., & Gil, S. (2014). Emotion and time perception: Effects of film-induced mood. In A. Vatakis (Ed.), International conference on timing and time perception, 31 March – 3 April 2014, Corfu, Greece, special issue of Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 126, pp. 251–252).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, P.F., & Rizzolatti, G. (Eds.). (2015). New frontiers in mirror neurons research. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingerhut, J., & Heimann, K. (2017). Movies and the mind: On our filmic body. In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, Enaction, and culture. Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, M.G. (2011). The textures of time. Agency and temporal experience. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1964). The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2011). Time in action. In C. Callender (Ed.), (pp. 493–515).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Guerra, M. (forthcoming). The empathic screen. Cinema and neuroscience. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallotti, M., Fairhurst, M.T., & Frith, C.D. (2017). Alignment in social interactions. Consciousness and Cognition, 48, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germeys, F., & D’Ydewalle, G. (2007). The psychology of film: Perceiving beyond the cut. Psychological Research, 71, 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyau, J.-M. (1890). La genèse de l’idée de temps. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, C. (2012). Time warped: Unlocking the mysteries of time perception. Toronto: Anansi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, E. (Ed.). (2012). Time, media and modernity. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. (2007). The secret pulse of time. Making sense of life’s scarcest commodity. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. C., Fuchs, T., Summa, M., & Müller, C. (2012). Body memory, metaphor, and movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, J., Berardi, A.M., & Brangier, E. (2014). Embodiment of intersubjective time: Relational dynamics as attractors in the temporal coordination of interpersonal behaviors and experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverence, B. M., & Scholl, B. J. (2012). Discrete events as units of perceived time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., Boone, S.M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliano, J.P., & Zacks, J.M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 8, 1489–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoudi, E. (2015). Investigation of the effects of editing techniques for time manipulation and continuity editing rules in time estimation. Master Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W.J., & Meck, W.H. (2014). Time perception: The bad news and the good. WIREs Cogn Sci, 5, 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, T. (2011). Out of time: Desire in atemporal cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meck, W.H., & Ivry, R.B. (Eds.). (2016). Time in perception and action. [special issue]. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 1–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, H., & De la Fuente, V. (Eds.). (2014). Neurobiology of interval timing. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, H., Harrington, D.L., & Meck, W.H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neurosciences, 36, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhoff, H.F., Vanes, L.D., & Huff, M. (2015). Spatiotemporal predictability alters perceived duration of visual events: Memento effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittel, J. (2015). Complex TV. The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York/London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mölder, B., Arstila, V., & Øhrstrøm, P. (Eds.). (2016). Philosophy and psychology of time. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mroz, M. (2012). Temporality and film analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (2006). Death 24x a second: Stillness and the moving image. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nather, F.C., & Oliveira Bueno, J.L. (2012). Timing perception in paintings and sculptures of Edgar Degas. KronoScope, 12(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nather, F.C., Oliveira Bueno, J.L., Bigand, E., & Droit-Volet, S. (2011). Time changes with the embodiment of another’s body posture. PLoS One, 6(5), e19818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nather, F.C., Alarcon, P., Fernandes, M., & Oliveira Bueno, J.L. (2014). Subjective time perception is affected by different durations of exposure to abstract paintings that represent human movement. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(3), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, I. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of temporal experience. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulaki, M. (2015). Brain science and film theory. Reassessing the place of cognitive discontinuity in cinema. Projections, 9(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, H. (2012). Stop the clocks! Time and narrative in cinema. London/New York: Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radvansky, G.A., & Zacks, J.M. (2014). Event Cognition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reisz, K., & Millar, G. (2010). The technique of film editing (2nd ed.). London: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984–1988). Time and narrative (Voll. 1–3 (1983–1985)). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2007). Mirrors in the brain. How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: A basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roenneberg, T. (2012). Internal time. Chronotypes, social jet lag, and why you’re so tired. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, A., Meck, W.H., & Penney, T.B. (2016). The socio-temporal brain: Connecting people in time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 760–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, T.F., & Zacks, J.M. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding events from perception to action. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.J. (2013). Watching you watch movies: Using eye tracking to inform cognitive film theory. In: Shimamura (Ed.), (pp. 165–191).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2017). Film, art and the third culture. A naturalized aesthetics of film. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.J., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (1992). The address of the eye. A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2004). The scene of the screen. Envisioning photographic, cinematic, and electronic ‘presence’. In V. Sobchack (Ed.), Carnal thoughts. Embodiment and moving image culture (pp. 135–162). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2007). Framed time. Toward a postfilmic cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sucala, M., et al. (2010). Psychological time: Interval length judgements and subjective passage of time judgements. Current Psychology Letters, 26(2), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrone, E. (2017). On time in cinema. In I. Phillips (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of temporal experience (pp. 326–338). London/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tikka, P., Kaipainen, M. (2014). Phenomenological considerations on time consciousness under neurocinematic search light. In D’Aloia, Eugeni (Eds.), (pp. 127–139).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikka, P., & Kaipainen, M. (2015). Embodied protonarratives embedded in systems of contexts. A neurocinematic approach. In M.J. Grabowski (Ed.), Neuroscience and media: New understandings and representations (pp. 76–88). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifonova, T. (2007). Imaginary time in contemporary cinema. In T. Trifonova (Ed.), The image in French philosophy (pp. 261–306). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A. et al. (2014). Time to act: New perspectives on embodiment and timing. In A. Vatakis (Ed.), International Conference on Timing and Time Perception, 31 March – 3 April 2014, Corfu, Greece [special issue] Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 126, pp. 16–20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A., Balcı, F., Di Luca, M., & Correa, Á. (Eds.). (2018). Timing and time perception: Procedures, measures, and applications. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, C., & Van Der Wel, R.P. (2013). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition, 153, 118–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicary, S., Sperling, M., Von Zimmermann, J., Richardson, D.C., & Orgs, G. (2017). Joint action aesthetics. PLoS One, 12(7), e0180101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA, 109, E673–E677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J.H. (2005). The wrong tree: Time perception and time experience in the elderly. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.), Measuring the mind: Speed, age, and control (pp. 137–158). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J.H. (2008). The perception of time: Basic research and some potential links to the study of language. Language Learning, 58 (Suppl. 1), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J.H. (2015). Passage of time judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 38, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J.H. (2016). The psychology of time perception. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J.H., O’Donoghue, A., Ogden, R., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Subjective duration in the laboratory and the world outside. In V. Arstila, D. Lloyd (Eds.), (pp. 294–310).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, M., & van Wassenhove, V. (Eds.). (2009). The experience of time: Neural mechanisms and the interplay of emotion, cognition and embodiment [Special Issue]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 1525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, M. (2016). Felt time. The psychology of how we perceive time. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, M., van Wassenhove, V., Craig, A.D., & Paulus, M.P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilatation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2018). Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices’ suboptimal timing? Cognition, 178, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J.M. (2015). Flicker: Your brain on movies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J.M., & Magliano, J.P. (2011). Film understanding and cognitive neuroscience. In F. Bacci & D.P. Melcher (Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 435–454). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this report took place within a PRIN (Research Project of National Interest) titled Perception, Performativity and Cognitive Sciences and funded by the Italian Government (2015, Grant number: 2015TM24JS - SH4; P.I. Antonio Pennisi, Università degli studi di Messina). The unit working team included Ruggero Eugeni (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, coordinator), Riccardo Manzotti (IULM – International University of Languages and Media, Milan), Adriano D’Aloia (Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”), Federica Cavaletti (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), and Massimo Locatelli (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore). We conducted the experiment in collaboration with Maria Rita Ciceri’s team, composed by Stefania Balzarotti and Elisa Cardani (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan). We thank Pia Tikka, Tim Smith, Patricia Pisters, Vinzenz Hediger, Maria Poulaki, Julian Hanich, Joerg Fingerhut, Francesco Sticchi, Alessandro Antonietti, Vittorio Gallese, Pietro Montani, Ninni Pennisi, and all the colleagues of the PRIN project for their useful suggestions. A special thanks to Ed Tan and Katrin Heimann for their careful reading of the paper and their comments and encouragements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruggero Eugeni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eugeni, R., Balzarotti, S., Cavaletti, F., D’Aloia, A. (2020). It Doesn’t Seem_It, But It Is. A Neurofilmological Approach to the Subjective Experience of Moving-Image Time. In: Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (eds) The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22090-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics